Coasean bargaining with symmetric delay costs

Resource and Energy Economics

Volumn 20, Issue 4, 1998, Pages 309-326

  Shogren, Jason F ^a  

^a UNIVERSITY OF WYOMING   (United States)

Author keywords

[No Author keywords available]

Indexed keywords

COSTS; ENERGY EFFICIENCY; HEURISTIC METHODS;

COASEAN BARGAINING; SYMMETRIC DELAY COSTS;

ENERGY POLICY;

BARGAINING; DISPUTE RESOLUTION; ENVIRONMENTAL POLICY; METHODOLOGY;

EID: 0032454492     PISSN: 09287655     EISSN: None     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1016/S0928-7655(97)00026-2     Document Type: Article

References (25)

1. Beissinger, S., 1995. Population trends of the marbled murrelet projected from demographic analysis. Ecology and Conservation of the Marbled Murrelet. US Department of Agriculture, Forest Service Report PSW-GTR-152, pp. 385-393.
2. Burton L. Disputing distributions in a shrinking commons: the case of drought in California. Natural Resources J. 32:1992;779-816.
3. Coase R. The problem of social cost. J. Law and Economics. 3:1960;1-44.
4. Coase, R., 1988. The Firm, the Market and the Law. Univ. of Chicago Press, Chicago.
5. Cramton P., Tracy J. Wage bargaining with time-varying threats. J. Labor Economics. 12:1994;594-617.
6. Crowfoot, J., Wondolleck, J., 1990. Environmental dispute settlement. In: Crowfoot, J., Wondolleck, J. (Eds.), Environmental Disputes. Community Involvement in Conflict Resolution. Island Press, Washington, DC, pp. 17-31.
7. Edwards W. Probability-preference in gambling. Am. J. Psychology. 66:1953;349-364.
8. Güth W., Tietz R. Ultimatum bargaining: a survey and comparison of experimental results. J. Economic Psychology. 11:1990;417-449.
9. Harrison G., McKee M. Experimental evaluation of the Coase Theorem. J. Law and Economics. 28:1985;653-670.
10. Hart O. Bargaining and strikes. Q. J. Economics. 104:1989;25-44.
11. Hoffman E., Spitzer M. The Coase Theorem: some experimental tests. J. Law and Economics. 25:1982;73-98.
12. Hoffman E., Spitzer M. Entitlements, rights, and fairness: an experimental examination of subjects' concepts of distributional justice. J. Legal Studies. 54:1985;259-297.
13. Kahneman D., Knetsch J., Thaler R. Fairness as a constraint to profit taking: entitlements in the market. Am. Economic Rev. 76:1986;728-741.
14. March J., Shapira Z. Managerial perspectives on risk and risk taking. Management Sci. 33:1987;1404-1418.
15. MacCrimmon, K., Wehrung, D., 1986. Taking risks: the management of uncertainty. Free Press, New York.
16. Ochs J., Roth A. An experimental study of sequential bargaining. Q. J. Economics. 79:1989;355-384.
17. Roth, A., 1995. Bargaining experiments. In: Kagel, J., Roth, A. (Eds.), Handbook of Experimental Economics. Princeton Univ. Press, Princeton, pp. 253-348.
18. Roth A., Murnigham J., Schoumaker F. The deadline effect in bargaining: some experimental evidence. Am. Economic Rev. 78:1988;806-823.
19. Schoemaker P. Preferences for information on probability versus prizes: the role of risk-taking attitudes. J. Risk and Uncertainty. 2:1989;37-60.
20. Selten R. Properties of a measure of predictive success. Mathematical Social Sci. 21:1991;153-167.
21. Selten, R., Krischker, W., 1982. Comparison of two theories for characteristics function experiments. In: Tietz, R. (Ed.), Aspiration Levels in Bargaining and Economic Decision Making. Springer, Berlin, pp. 259-264.
22. Shogren J. An experiment on Coasean bargaining over ex ante lotteries and ex post rewards. J. Economic Behavior and Organization. 17:1992;153-169.
23. Shogren J., Kask S. Exploring the boundaries of the Coase Theorem: efficiency and rationality given imperfect contract enforcement. Economics Lett. 39:1992;155-161.
24. Slovic P., Lichtenstein S. Relative importance of probability and payoff in risk taking. J. Exp. Psychology (Monograph). 78:1968;1-18.
25. Wilson, N., 1995. Injunction Bars Headwaters 'Salvage' Logging. Albion Monitor, 9 October.