Environmental relationships of vegetation patterns in saltmarshes of central Argentina

Folia Geobotanica

Volumn 33, Issue 2, 1998, Pages 133-145

  Cantero, Juan José ^a   Cisneros, José Manuel ^a   Zobel, Martin ^b   Cantero, Alberto ^a  

^a DEPARTAMENTO DE QUÍMICA   (Argentina)

^b UNIVERSITY OF TARTU   (Estonia)

Author keywords

[No Author keywords available]

Indexed keywords

ENVIRONMENTAL CONDITIONS; GROUNDWATER; SALTMARSH;

ARGENTINA;

EID: 0032448521     PISSN: 12119520     EISSN: None     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1007/BF02913341     Document Type: Article

References (43)

1. ADAM P. (1990): Saltmarsh ecology. Cambridge University Press, Cambridge.
2. ANTROP M. (1983): Inventoring and monitoring of landscape as a natural and cultural resource. Proceedings of a EARSEL/ESA symposium on remote sensing application for environment studies (ESA SP-188), Brussels, Belgium.
3. BURKART S.E., LEON R.J.C. & MOVIA C. (1990): Phytosociological inventory of an area of the Depression del Salado (Buenos Aires, Argentina) spanning the main environmental gradients. Darwiniana 30: 27-69.
4. CABALLERO J.M., ESTEVE M.A., CALVO J.F. & PUJOL J.A. (1994): Structure of the vegetation of salt steppes of Guadalentin (Murcia, Spain). Stud. Oecol. 10-11: 171-183.
5. CALLAWAY R.M. & SABRAW C.S. (1994): Effects of variable precipitation on the structure and diversity of a California saltmarsh community. J. Veg. Sci. 5: 433-438.
6. CANTERO J.J. & BIANCO C.A. (1986): Vascular plants in the southwest of the province of Córdoba (Argentina): Preliminar catalogue of the species. Revista Univ. Nac. Rio Cuarto 6: 5-52.
7. CANTERO J.J., CANTERO A. & CISNEROS J.M. (1996): The vegetation of hydrohalomorphic landscapes in central Argentina. Ed. Universidad Nacional de Rio Cuarto, Argentina.
8. CANTERO J.J., CANTERO A. & CISNEROS J.M. (1998): Habitat structure and vegetation relationships in central Argentina saltmarsh landscapes. Pl. Ecol. (in press).
9. CANTERO J.J. & LEON R.J.C. (1996): Comparison of vegetation classifications from Argentine saltmarsh landscapes. Abstr. Bot. 20: 69-83.
10. CANTU P.M. & DEGIOVANNI S.E (1984): Geomorphology of the central region of Córdoba province (Argentina). In: IX Geological Argentine Congress, Geological Argentine Society, San Carlos de Bariloche, Sect. IV: 66-92.
11. CHANETON E.J., FACELLI J.M. & LEON R.J.C. (1988): Floristic changes induced by flooding on grazed and ungrazed lowland grasslands in Argentina. J. Range Managem. 41: 497-501.
12. FLOWERS T.J. (1975): Halophytes. In: BAKER D.A. & HALL J.L. (eds.), Ion transport in cells and tissues, North Holland, Amsterdam, pp. 309-334.
13. GARCIA L.V., MARANON T., MORENO A. & CLEMENTE L. (1993): Above-ground biomass and species richness in a Mediterranean saltmarsh. J. Veg. Sci. 4: 417-424.
14. KRUEGGER H.R. & PEINEMANN N. (1996): Coastal plain halophytes and their relation to soil ionic composition. Vegetatio 122: 143-150.
15. LEWIS J.P., PIRE E.F., CARNEVALE E.J., BOCCANELLI S., STOFELLA S. & PRADO D.E. (1985): Floristic groups and plant communities of southeastern Santa Fe, Argentina. Vegetatio 60: 67-90.
16. MARYAM H., ISMAIL S., ALA F. & AHMAD R. (1995): Studies on growth and salt regulation in some halophytes as influenced by edaphic and climatic conditions. Pakistan J. Bot. 27: 151-163.
17. O'LEARY J.W. & GLENN E.P. (1994): Global distribution and potential for halophytes. In: SQUIRES V.R & AYOUB A.T. (eds.), Halophytes as a resource for livestock and for rehabilitation of degraded lands, Task for vegetation science 32, Kluwer, Dordrecht, pp. 7-15.
18. ORLOCI L. (1978): Multivariate analysis in vegetation research. Ed. 2. Dr. W. Junk, The Hague.
19. ORLOCI L. & KENKEL N.C. (1987): Data analysis in population and community ecology. Univ. of Hawaii, Honolulu and New Mexico State University, Las Cruces.
20. ORLOCI L. & STANEK W. (1979): Vegetation survey on the Alaska Highway. Yukon territory: types and gradients. Vegetatio 41: 1-56.
21. PERELMAN S., LEON R.J.C. & DEREGIBUS V.A. (1982): The application of an objective method to the study of native grassland communities in the Salado River Basin (Argentina). Revista Fac. Agron. (Buenos Aires) 3: 27-40.
22. PIZARRO F. (1978): Drenaje agricola y recuperacion de suelos salinos. Editorial Agricola Española, Madrid.
23. RAGONESE A. & COVAS G. (1947): The halophilous flora of southern Santa Fe province (Argentina). Darwiniana 7: 401-496.
24. RICHARDS E. (1973): Diagnostico y rehabilitacion de Suelos Salinos y Sodicos. Ed. Limusa, México.
25. ŠMILAUER P. (1992): CanoDraw ver. 3.0. Lite. Microcomputer Power, USA.
26. SOIL SURVEY STAFF. (1975): Soil taxonomy. A basic system of soil classification for making and interpreting soil surveys. U. S. Department of Agriculture, Soil Conservation Service, Agricultural Handbook 436, Washington D. C.
27. SYKORA K. V., VANKATWIJK M. & MEIER R. (1987): Synecological relation in the moist grasslands of Ballyteige Innish, Ireland. In: HUISKES A.L.H., BLOM C.W.P.M. & ROZEMA J. (eds.), Vegetation between land and sea, Dr. W. Junk, Dordrecht.
28. TER BRAAK C.J.F. (1987a): Unimodal models to relate species to environment. Agricultural Mathematics Group, Wageningen.
29. TER BRAAK C.J.F. (1987b): The analysis of vegetation-environment relationships by canonical correspondence analysis. Vegetatio 69: 69-77.
30. TER BRAAK C.J.F. (1987c): CANOCO - a FORTRAN program for canonical community ordination by partial detrended canonical correspondence analysis, principal component analysis and redundancy analysis (version 2.1.). Agriculture Mathematics Group, Wageningen.
31. TER BRAAK C.J.F. (1988): Partial canonical correspondence analysis. In: BOCK H.H. (ed.), Classification methods and related methods of data analysis, North Holland, Amsterdam.
32. TER BRAAK C.J.F. & PRENTICE L.C. (1988): A theory of gradient analysis. Advances Ecol. Res. 18: 271-317.
33. UNGAR I. (1965): An ecological study of the vegetation of the big saltmarsh, Stanfford county, Kansas. Univ. Kansas Sci. Bull. 46: 1-99.
34. UNGAR I.A. (1968): Species-soil relationships on the Great Salt Plains of northern Oklahoma. Amer. Midl. Naturalist 80: 392-406.
35. UNGAR I.A. (1970): Species-soil relationships on sulfate dominated soils in South Dakota. Amer. Midl. Naturalist 3: 343-357.
36. UNGAR I.A. (1972): The vegetation of inland saline marshes of North America, north of Mexico. In: VAN DER MAAREL E. & TÜXEN R. (eds.), Grundfragen und methoden in der pflanzensoziologie, Dr. W. Junk, Den Haag.
37. UNGAR I.A. (1974a): Ecology of halophytes. Academic Press, New York.
38. UNGAR I.A. (1974b): Halophyte communities of Park county, Colorado. Bull. Torrey Bot. Club 101: 145-152.
39. WAISEL Y. (1972): Biology of halophytes. Academic Press, New York.
40. WILDI O. (1989): A new numerical solution to traditional phytosociological tabular classification. Vegetatio 81: 95-106.
41. WILDI O. & ORLOCI L. (1983): Management and multivariate analysis of vegetation data. Ed. 2. Eidg. Anst. Forstl. Versuchswes., Berlin.
42. WILDI O. & ORLOCI L. (1990): Numerical exploration of community patterns. SPB Academic Publ., The Hague.
43. WILDI O. (1994): Data analysis with MULVA-5. WSL, Birmensdorf.