Statistical evaluation of earthquake prediction results. Comments on the success rate and alarm rate. II

Acta Geophysica Polonica

Volumn 46, Issue 3, 1998, Pages 261-271

  Varotsos, Panayiotis ^a   Sarlis, Nikos ^a   Lazaridou, Maty ^a  

^a UNIVERSITY OF ATHENS   (Greece)

Author keywords

[No Author keywords available]

Indexed keywords

EARTHQUAKE PREDICTION; STATISTICAL ANALYSIS;

EID: 0032448171     PISSN: 00015725     EISSN: None     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: None     Document Type: Article

References (5)

1. Geller, R.J., 1996, VAN: A critical evaluation. In: Sir J. Lighthill (ed.), "The Critical Review of VAN: Earthquake Prediction from Seismic Electric Signals", 155-238, World Scientific Publishing Co., Singapore.
2. Lasocki, S., 1998, Evaluation of earthquake prediction rates allowing for magnitude uncertainties, Acta Geophys. Pol., 46, 3,1-27.
3. Mulargia, F., and P. Gasperini, 1996, Behind VAN: Tectonic stress changes or earthquake induced alertness? In: Sir J. Lighthill (ed.), "The Critical Review of VAN: Earthquake Prediction from Seismic Electric Signals", 244-249, World Scientific Publishing Co., Singapore.
4. Varotsos, P., N. Sarlis, M. Lazaridou and N. Bogris, 1996, Statistical evaluation of earthquake prediction results. Comments on the success rate and alarm rate, Acta Geophys. Pol., 44, 4, 329-347.
5. Wyss, M., 1996, Brief summary of some reasons why the VAN hypothesis for predicting earthquakes has to be rejected. In: Sir J. Lighthill (ed.), "The Critical Review of VAN: Earthquake Prediction from Seismic Electric Signals", 250-264, World Scientific Publishing Co., Singapore.