Effects of silvicultural cleaning in mixed pine-deciduous stands on moose damage to scots pine (Pinus sylvestris)

Scandinavian Journal of Forest Research

Volumn 13, Issue 1-4, 1998, Pages 429-436

  Härkönen, Sauli ^a  

^a FINNISH FOREST RESEARCH INSTITUTE   (Finland)

Author keywords

Alces alces; Cleaning; Food availability; Moose; Moose damage; Pinus sylvestris; Scots pine

Indexed keywords

BIOMASS; COMPETITION; FORAGING; FOREST; PLANT HEIGHT; SILVICULTURE;

BIOMASS; ENVIRONMENTAL IMPACT; ENVIRONMENTAL PROTECTION; MANAGEMENT; PLANTS (BOTANY); VEGETATION;

ANIMAL BROWSING; BIODIVERSITY; FOOD AVAILABILITY; MOOSE; MOOSE DAMAGE; SILVICULTURAL CLEANING;

FORESTRY;

EID: 0032447419     PISSN: 02827581     EISSN: 16511891     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1080/02827589809383003     Document Type: Article

References (30)

1. Andersen, R., and Sæther, B.-E., 1992. Functional response during winter of a herbivore, the moose, in relation to age and size. Ecology, 73:542–550.
2. Bergström, R., and Hjeljord, O., 1987. Moose and vegetation interactions in Northwestern Europe and Poland. Swedish Wildl. Res., :213–228.
3. Bryant, J. P., and Kuropat, P. J., 1980. Selection of winter forage by subarctic browsing vertebrates:the role of plant chemistry. Annu. Rev. Ecol. Syst., 11:261–285.
4. Cajander, A. K., 1909. Über Waldtypen. Acta For. Fenn., 1:175 (In German.)
5. Cederlund, G., Ljungqvist, H., Markgren, G., and Stålfelt, F., 1980. Foods of moose and roedeer at Grimsö in central Sweden - results of rumen content analyses. Viltrevy, 11:169–247.
6. Danell, K., Gref, R., and Yazdani, R., 1990. Effects of mono- and diterpenes in Scots pine needles on moose browsing. Scand. J. For. Res., 5:535–539.
7. Danell, K., Edenius, L., and Lundberg, P., 1991. Herbivory and tree stand composition:moose patch use in winter. Ecology, 72:1350–1357.
8. Edenius, L., 1991. The effect of resource depletion on the feeding behaviour of a browser:winter foraging by moose on Scots pine. J. Appl. Ecol., 28:318–328.
9. Heikkilä, R., 1990. Effect of plantation characteristics on moose browsing on Scots pine. Silva Fenn., 24:341–351.
10. Heikkilä, R., 1991. Moose browsing in Scots pine plantation mixed with deciduous tree species. Acta For. Fenn., 224:13
11. Heikkilä, R., 1993. Effects of food quantity and tree species composition on moose (Alces alces) browsing in Scots pine plantations. Folia For., 815:18 (In Finnish with English summary.)
12. Heikkilä, R., and Härkönen, S., 1993. Moose (Alces alces L.) browsing in young Scots pine stands in relation to the characteristics of their winter habitats. Silva Fenn., 27:127–143.
13. Heikkilä, R., and Härkönen, S., 1996. Moose browsing in young Scots pine stands in relation to forest management. For. Ecol. Manage., 88:179–186.
14. Heikkilä, R., and Mikkonen, T., 1992. Effects of density of young Scots pine (Pinus sylvestris) stand on moose (Alces alsces) browsing. Acta For. Fenn., 231:14
15. Hjeljord, O., and Grønvold, S., 1988. Glyphosate application in forest - ecological aspects:browsing by moose (Alces alces) in relation to chemical and mechanical brush control. Scand. J. For. Res., 3:115–121.
16. Ikäheimo, E., and Norokorpi, Y., 1986. The effect of cleaning on the incidence of damage and the development and quality of Scots pine plantations in northern Finland. Folia For., 647:49 (In Finnish with English summary.)
17. Lääperi, A., and Löyttyniemi, K., 1988. Moose (Alces alces) damage in pine plantation established during 1973–82 in the Uusimaa-Häme Forestry Board District. Folia For., 719:13 (In Finnish with English summary.)
18. Lavsund, S., 1987. Moose relationships to forestry in Finland, Norway and Sweden. Swedish Wildl. Res. Suppl., 1:229–224.
19. Löyttyniemi, K., and Lääperi, A., 1988. Moose in Finnish forestry, Report 13 56Dept. of Agricultural and Forest Zoology, Univ. of Helsinki. (In Finnish with English summary.) ISBN 951–40–1011–6
20. Löyttyniemi, K., and Piisilä, N., 1983. Moose (Alces alces) damage in young pine plantations in the Forestry Board District Uusimaa-Häme. Folia For., 553:23 (In Finnish with English summary.)
21. Lundberg, P., and Åström, M., 1990. Functional response of optimally foraging herbivores. J. Theor. Biol., 144:367–377.
22. Lundberg, P., Åström, M., and Danell, K., 1990. An experimental test of frequency-dependent food selection:winter browsing by moose. Holarc. Ecol., 13:177–182.
23. Oldemeyer, J. L., Franzmann, A. W., Brundage, A. L., Arneson, P. D., and Flynn, A., 1977. Browse quality and the Kenai moose population. J. Wildl. Manage., 41:533–542.
24. Sicther, B.-E., and Andersen, R., 1990. Resource limitation in a generalist herbivore, the moose Alces alces:ecological constraints on behavioural decisions. Can. J. Zool., 68:993–999.
25. Salonen, J., 1982. Nutritional value of moose winter browsing plants. Suomen Riista, 29:40–45. (In Finnish with English summary.)
26. Sunnerheim-Sjöberg, K., and Hämäläinen, M., 1992. Multivariate study of moose browsing in relation to phenol pattern in pine needles. J. Chem. Ecol., 18:659–672.
27. Telfer, E. S., 1969. Twig weight-diameter relationships for browse species. J. Wildl. Manage., 33:917–921.
28. Thompson, I. D., McQueen, R. E., Reichardt, P. B., Trenholm, D. G., and Curran, W. J., 1990. Factors influencing choice of balsam fir twigs from thinned and unthinned stands by moose. Oecologia, 81:506–509.
29. Vivås, H. J., and Sæther, B.-E., 1987. Interactions between a generalist herbivore, the moose Alces alces, and its food resources:an experimental study of winter foraging behaviour in relation to browse availability. J. Anim. Ecol., :509–520.
30. Westoby, M., 1974. An analysis of diet selection by large generalist herbivores. Am. Nat., 108:290–304.