Environmental priming influences allergenspecific nasal reactivity

Allergy: European Journal of Allergy and Clinical Immunology

Volumn 53, Issue 12, 1998, Pages 1172-1177

  Toth, J ^a   Schultze Werninghaus, C ^a   Marks, B ^a   Temmel, A F P ^a   Stubner P ^a   Jager S ^a   Horak, F ^a  

^a MEDICAL UNIVERSITY OF VIENNA   (Austria)

Author keywords

Allergic rhinitis; Environmental allergens; Grass pollen allergy; Priming; Rhinomanometry

Indexed keywords

ADULT; ALLERGIC RHINITIS; ALLERGY; ARTICLE; CLINICAL ARTICLE; DANDER; ENVIRONMENTAL FACTOR; FEMALE; HUMAN; IMMUNOREACTIVITY; MALE; PRIORITY JOURNAL;

EID: 0032444990     PISSN: 01054538     EISSN: None     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1111/j.1398-9995.1998.tb03837.x     Document Type: Article

References (31)

1. Wachs M, Proud D, Lichtenstein LM, Kagey-Sobotka A, Norman PS, Naclerio RM. Observations on the pathogenesis of nasal priming. J Allergy Clin Immunol 1989;84:492-501.
2. Iliopoulos O, Proud D, Adkinson NFJ, et al. Relationship between the early, late, and rechallenge reaction to nasal challenge with antigen: observations on the role of inflammatory mediators and cells. J Allergy Clin Immunol 1990;86:851-61.
3. Connell JT. Quantitative intranasal pollen challenges. III. The priming effect in allergic rhinitis. J Allergy 1969;43:33-44.
4. Hayden ML, Rose G, Diduch KB, et al. Benzyl benzoate moist powder: investigation of acaricidal [correction of acarical] activity in cultures and reduction of dust mite-allergens in carpets. J Allergy Clin Immunol 1992;89:536-45.
5. Green WF, Nicholas NR, Salome CM, Woolcock AJ. Reduction of house-dust mites and mite-allergens: effects of spraying carpets and blankets with Allersearch DMS, an acaricide combined with an allergen-reducing agent. Clin Exp Allergy 1989;19:203-7.
6. Munir AK, Einarsson R, Schou C, Dreborg SK. Allergens in school dust. I. The amount of the major cat (Fel d I) and dog (Can f I) allergens in dust from Swedish schools is high enough to probably cause perennial symptoms in most children with asthma who are sensitized to cat and dog. J Allergy Clin Immunol 1993;91:1067-74.
7. Horak F, Jäger S. The Vienna challenge chamber: a method to test allergen exposition. Wiener Klin Wochenschr 1987;99:509-10.
8. Jäger S, Horak F. VCC - Vienna challenge chamber -pollen distribution. Allergy 1988;43:56.
9. Johnsen CR, Weeke FR, Nielsen J, et al. Aeroallergen analyses and their clinical relevance. II. Sampling by high-volume air sampler with immunochemical quantification versus Burkard pollen trap sampling with morphologic quantification. Allergy 1992;47:510-16.
10. Clement PAR. Committee report on standardization of rhinomanometry. Rhinology 1984;22:151-5.
11. 1-receptor antagonists on nasal obstruction in atopic patients. Allergy 1993;48:226-9.
12. Clement PA. Rhinomanometry. Allergy 1997;52 Suppl 33: 26-7.
13. Sandham A. Rhinomanometric method error in the assessment of nasal respiratory resistance. Rhinology 1988;26:191-201.
14. Pirila T, Talvisara A, Alho OP, Oja H. Physiological fluctuations in nasal resistance may interfere with nasal monitoring in the nasal provocation test. Acta Otolaryngol (Stockh) 1997;117:596-600.
15. Simola M, Malmberg H. Sensation of nasal airflow compared with nasal airway resistance in patients with rhinitis. Clin Otolaryngol 1997;22:260-2.
16. Pastorello EA, Riario-Sforza GG, Incorvaia C, Segala M, Fumagalli M, Gandini R. Comparison of rhinomanometry, symptom score, and inflammatory cell counts in assessing the nasal late-phase reaction to allergen challenge. J Allergy Clin Immunol 1994;93:85-92.
17. Meltzer EO. Evaluating rhinitis: clinical, rhinomanometric, and cytological assessments. J Allergy Clin Immunol 1988;82:900-8.
18. Sakaguchi M, Inouye S, Irie T, et al. Airborne cat (Fel d I), dog (Can f I), and mite (Der I and Der II) allergen levels in the homes of Japan. J Allergy Clin Immunol 1993;92:797-802.
19. Charpin C, Mata P, Charpin D, Lavaut MN, Allasia C, Vervloet D. Fel d I allergen distribution in cat fur and skin. J Allergy Clin Immunol 1991;88:77-82.
20. van der Brempt X, Charpin D, Haddi E, da Mata P, Vervloet D. Cat removal and Fel d I levels in mattresses. J Allergy Clin Immunol 1991;87:596-7.
21. De Blay F, Heymann PW, Chapman MD, Platts-Mills TA. Airborne dust mite-allergens: comparison of group II allergens with group I mite-allergen and cat allergen Fel d I. J Allergy Clin Immunol 1991;88:919-26.
22. Ohman JL, Lorusso JR, Lewis S. Cat allergen content of commercial house dust extracts: comparison with dust extracts from cat containing environment. J Allergy Clin Immunol 1987;79:955-9.
23. Swanson MC, Agarwal MK, Reed CE. An immunochemical approach to indoor aeroallergen quantitation with a new volumetric air sampler: studies with mite, roach, cat, mouse, and guinea pig antigens. J Allergy Clin Immunol 1985;76:724-9.
24. Marks GB, Tovey ER, Green W, Shearer M, Salome CM, Woolcock AJ. House-dust mite allergen avoidance: a randomized controlled trial of surface chemical treatment and encasement of bedding. Clin Exp Allergy 1995;25:383-4.
25. Horak F, Jäger S. Die Erreger des Heufiebers: Medizinisch-botanische Dokumentation der Pollenallergie in Mitteleuropa. München: Urban & Schwarzenberg, 1979.
26. Mühlemann RJ, Wüthrich B. Food allergies 1983-1987. Schweiz Med Wochenschr 1991;121:1696-700.
27. Helbling A, Lopez M, Schwartz HJ, Lehrer SB. Reactivity of carrot-specific IgE antibodies with celery, apiaceous spices, and birch pollen. Ann Allergy 1993;70:795-9.
28. Garcia-Ortis JC, Cosmes PM, Lopez-Asunsolo A. Allergy to foods in patients monosensitized to Artemisia pollen. Allergy 1996;51:927-31.
29. Vieths S, Jankiewicz A, Wüthrich B, Baltes W. Immunoblot study of IgE binding allergens in celery roots. Ann Allergy Asthma Immunol 1995;75:48-55.
30. Jensen-Jarolim E, Leitner A, Hirschwehr R, et al. Characterization of allergens in Apiaceae spices: anise, fennel, coriander and cumin. Clin Exp Allergy 1997;27: 1299-1306.
31. Aardoom HA, Hirasing RA, Rona J, Sanavro FL, van den Heuvel EW, Leeuwenburg J. Food intolerance (food hypersensitivity) and chronic complaints in children: the parents' perception. Eur J Pediatr 1997;156:110-12.