Classification of fruit trees - What is the problem ? What is important ?

Journal of the Japanese Society for Horticultural Science

Volumn 67, Issue 6, 1998, Pages 1193-1196

  Iketani, H ^a  

^a NATIONAL INSTITUTE OF FRUIT TREE SCIENCE   (Japan)

Author keywords

[No Author keywords available]

Indexed keywords

AMPLIFIED FRAGMENT LENGTH POLYMORPHISM; FRUIT TREE; GENETIC DISTANCE; GENETIC MARKER; ISOENZYME; PHYLOGENY; RANDOM AMPLIFIED POLYMORPHIC DNA; RESTRICTION FRAGMENT LENGTH POLYMORPHISM; TAXONOMY;

EMBRYOPHYTA;

EID: 0032443166     PISSN: 18823351     EISSN: None     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.2503/jjshs.67.1193     Document Type: Conference Paper

References (27)

1. Ayliffe, M. A., G. J. Lawrence, J. G. Ellis and A. J. Pryor. 1994. Heteroduplex molecules formed between allelic sequences cause nonparent RAPD bands. Nuc. Acids Res. 22: 1632-1636.
2. Backeljau, T., L. De Bruyn, H. De Wolf, K. Joprdaens, S. Van Dongen, R. Verhagen and B. Winnepenninkx. 1995. Random amplified polymorphic DNA (RAPD) and parsimony methods. Cladistics 11 : 119-130.
3. Dullo, M. E., L. Guarino and B. V. Ford-Lloyd. 1997. A bibliography and review of genetic diversity studies of African germplasm using protein and DNA markers. Genet. Res. Crop Evol. 44 : 447-470.
4. Ellsworth, D. L., K. D. Rittenhouse and R. L. Honeycutt. 1993. Artificial variation in random amplified polymorphic DNA banding patterns. Biotechniques 14 : 214 -217.
5. Farris, J. S. 1979. The information content of the phylogenetic system. Syst. Zool. 28 : 483-519.
6. Felsenstein, J. 1985. Phylogenies and the comparative method. Amer. Nat. 125 : 1-15.
7. Gilmour, S. L. 1940. Taxonomy and philosophy. p.404-424. In : J. Huxley (ed.). The new systematics. Oxford Univ. Press, Oxford.
8. Guilford, P., S. Prakash, J. M. Zhu, E. Rikkerink, S. Gardiner, H. Bassett and R. Forster. 1997. Microsatellites in Malus x domestica (apple) : abundance, polymorphism and cultivar identifications. Theor. Appl. Genet. 94: 249-254.
9. Harvey, P. H. and M. D. Pagel. 1991. The comparative method in evolutionary biology. viii+239 pp. Oxford Univ. Press, Oxford.
10. Halldén, C., M. Hansen, N.-O. Nilsson, A. Hjerdin and T. Säll. 1996. Competition as a source of errors in RAPD analysis. Theor. Appl. Genet. 93 : 1185-1192.
11. Hawkes, J. G. 1981. Biosystematic studies as an aid to breeding research and plant breeding. Kulturpflanze 29 : 327-336.
12. Hillis, D. M. 1994. Homology in molecular biology. p. 339-368. In : B. K. Hall (ed.). Homology, the hierarchical basis of comparative biology. Academic Press, San Diego.
13. Hoey, B. K. , K. R. Crowe, V. M. Jones and N. O. Polans. 1996. A phylogenetic analysis of Pisum based on morphological characters, and allozyme and RAPD markers. Theor. Appl. Genet. 92 : 92-100.
14. Hunt, G. J. and R. E. Page, Jr. 1992. Patterns of inheritance with RAPD molecular markers reveal novel types of polymorphism in the honey bee. Theor. Appl. Genet. 85 : 12-20.
15. Lowe, A. J., O. Hanotte and L. Guarino. 1996, Standardization of molecular genetic techniques for the characterization of germplasm collections : the case of random amplified polymorphic DNA (RAPD). Plant Genet. Res. Newsl. No. 107 : 50-54.
16. Nei, M. 1987. Molecular evolutionary genetics. x+512pp. Columbia Univ. Press, New York.
17. Nei, M. and W.-H. Li. 1979. Mathematical model for studying genetic variation in terms of restriction endonucleases. Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. USA 76 : 5269-5273.
18. Penner, G. A., A. Bush, R. Wise, W. Kim, L. Domier, K. Kasha, A. Laroche, G. Scoles, S. J. Molnar and G. Fedek. 1993. Reproducibility of random amplified polymorphic DNA (RAPD) analysis among laboratories. PCR Method Appl. 2 : 341-345.
19. Prentice, H. C. 1986. Continuous variation and classification. p.21-32. In : B. T. Styles (ed.). Infraspecific classification of wild and cultivated plants. Clarendon Press, Oxford.
20. Riedy, M. F., W. J. Hamilton III and C. F. Aquadro. 1992. Excess of non-parental bands in offspring from known primate pedigrees assayed using RAPD PCR. Nuc. Acids Res. 20 : 918.
21. Smith, J. J., J. S. Scott - Craig, J. R. Leadbetter, G. Y. Bush, D. L. Roberts and D. W. Fulbright. 1994. Characterization of random amplified polymorphic DNA (RAPD) products from Xanthomonas campestris and some comments on the use of RAPD products in phylogenetic analysis. Mol. Phylog. Evol. 3 : 135-145.
22. Sneath, P. H. and R. R. Sokal. 1973. Numerical taxonomy : the principles and practice of numerical classification. xvi + 573 pp. W. H. Freeman, San Francisco.
23. Thomas, M. R. and N. S. Scott. 1993. Microsatellite repeats in grapevine reveal DNA polymorphisms when analyzed as sequence - tagged sites (STS). Theor. Appl. Genet. 86 : 985-990.
24. Thomas, M. R., P. Cain and N. S. Scott. 1994. DNA typing of grapevines : A universal methodology and database for describing cultivars and evaluating genetic relatedness. Plant Mol. Biol. 25 : 939-949.
25. Vos, P., R. Hogers, M. Bleeker, M. Reijans, T. van de Lee, M. Homes, A. Frijters, J. Pot, J. Peleman, M. Kuiper and M. Zabeau. 1995. AFLP : a new technique for DNA fingerprinting. Nuc. Acids Res. 23 : 4407-4414.
26. Wilde, J., R. Waugh and W. Powell. 1992. Genetic fingerprinting of Theobroma clones using randomly amplified polymorphic DNA markers. Theor. Appl. Genet. 83 : 871-877.
27. Williams, J. G. K., M. K. Hanafey, J. A. Rafalski and S. V. Tingey. 1993. Genetic analysis using random amplified polymorphic DNA markers. Methods Enzymol. 218 : 704-740.