Instream flow evaluation by hydrologically-based and habitat preference (hydrobiological) techniques;Evaluation du debit reserve par methodes hydrologiques et hydrobiologiques

Revue des Sciences de l'Eau

Volumn 11, Issue 3, 1998, Pages 347-363

  Caissie, D ^a   El Jabi, N ^b   Bourgeois, G ^c  

^a FISHERIES AND OCEANS CANADA   (Canada)

^b UNIVERSITÉ DE MONCTON   (Canada)

^c WSP   (United Kingdom)

Author keywords

Fisheries and aquatic resources; Habitat modelling; Habitat preference method; Hydrologically based techniques; In stream flow requirements; PHABSIM

Indexed keywords

FISHERIES; HYDRAULICS; OCEAN HABITATS; STREAM FLOW; VELOCITY;

FLOW DURATION METHOD; HABITAT PREFERENCE METHODS; INSTREAM FLOW EVALUATION; MEAN ANNUAL FLOW; MEDIAN MONTHLY FLOW; TENNANT METHOD;

HYDROLOGY;

ASSESSMENT METHOD; FLOW PATTERN; HABITAT SELECTION; HYDROLOGY;

EID: 0032442904     PISSN: 09927158     EISSN: None     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.7202/705311ar     Document Type: Article

References (38)

1. BINNS N.A., EISERMAN F.M., 1979. Quantification of fluvial trout habitat in Wyoming, Trans. Amer. Fish. Soc., 108, 215-228.
2. BOURGEOIS G., 1992. Modélisation de l'habitat physique du saumon de l'atlantique avec PHABSIM: cas du ruisseau Catamaran, thèse de maîtrise, Université de Moncton, Moncton, NouveauBrunswick, 124 p.
3. BOURGEOIS G., CUNJAK R.A., CAISSIE D., EL-JABI N., 1996. A spatial and temporal evaluation of PHABSIM in relation to measured density of juvenile Atlantic salmon in a small stream. N. Am. J. Fish. Manag., 16, 154-166.
4. BOVEE K.D., 1982. A guide to stream habitat analysis using the instream flow incremental methodology, Instream Flow Information Paper no 12, FWS/OBS-82/26, Cooperative Instream Flow Service Group, US Fish and Wildlife Service, Fort Collins, CO, 249 p.
5. BOVEE K.D., 1986. Development and evaluation of habitat suitability criteria for use in the Instream Flow Incremental Methodology, Instream Flow Information Paper no 21, US Fish and Wildlife Service, Fort Collins, CO, Biol. Rep., 86(7), 235 p.
6. CAISSIE D., 1991. A computer software package for instream flow analysis by the flow duration method. Can. Tech. Rep. Fish. Aquat. Sci., 1812, 21 p.
7. CAISSIE D., EL-JABI N., CUNJAK R.A., BOUGEOIS G., 1992. Étude hydro-biologique du bassin Catamaran (NB), Compte rendus de symposium canadien d'Hydrologie no 19, 1992, 15-17 juin, 1992, Winnipeg, Manitoba, pp. 407-422.
8. CHAMBERS J.S., ALLEN G.H., PRESSEY R.T., 1955. Research Relating to Study of Spawning Grounds in Natural Areas, Annual Report, 1955: Washington Department of Fisheries. Olympia, WA.
9. CHIANG S.L., JOHNSON F.W., 1976. Low flow criteria for diversions and impoundments, J. Water Res. Plan. Manag. Div., ASCE 102 (WR2), 227-238.
10. CUNJAK R.A., CAISSIE D., EL-JABI N., 1990. The Catamaran Brook Habitat Research Project: Description and General Design of Study. Can. Tech. Rep. Fish. Aquat. Sci., 1751, 14 p.
11. CUNJAK R.A., CAISSIE D., EL-JABI N., HARDIE P., CONLON J.H., POLLOCK T.L., GIBERSON D.J., KOMADINA-DOUTHWRIGHT S., 1993. The Catamaran Brook (New Brunswick) Habitat Research Project: Biological, Physical and Chemical Conditions (1990-1992). Can. Tech. Rep. Fish. Aquat. Sci., 1914, 81 p.
12. EA ENGINEERING, SCIENCE AND TECHNOLOGY INC., 1986. Instream flow methodologies. Research Project 2194-2. Report prepared for the Electric Power Research Institute, Palo Alto, CA. 12 chapters and 1 appendix.
13. ENVIRONMENT CANADA, 1989. Historical Streamflow Summary: Atlantic Provinces 1988, Inland Waters Directorate, Water Resources Branch. Ottawa, 274 p.
14. ESTES C.C., ORSBORN J.F., 1986. Review and analysis of methods for quantifying instream flow requirements, Water Resources Bulletin, 22, 389-398.
15. FAUSCH K., HAWKES C., PARSONS M., 1988. Models that predict standing crop of fish from habitat variables: 1950-1985, Gen. Tech. Rep. PNWT-GTYR-213, USDA, Portland, OR, 52 p.
16. FRENETTE M., CARON M., JULIEN P., GIBSON R.J., 1984. Interaction entre le débit et les populations de tacons (Salmo salar) de la rivière Matamec, Québec, Can. J. Fish. Aquat. Sci., 41, 954-963.
17. GEER W.H., 1980. Evaluation of Five Instream Flow Needs Methodologies and Water Quantity Needs of Three Utah Trout Streams, U.S. Fish and Wildlife Service and Utah Division of Wildlife Resources, Publication no 80-20, 227 p.
18. HAMILTON R.E., KOSAKOSKI G.T., 1982. Water Requirements for the Fisheries Resource of the Englishman River, Vancouver Island, B.C. Can. Man. Rep. Fish. and Aquat. Sci., 1676, 42 p.
19. IEC BEAK COUNSULTANTS LTD, 1985. Instream Flow Needs for Fish below Hydropower Facilities in Canada: A Management Guide to Assessment Methods, Report prepared for the Canadian Electric Association, Suite 580, 1 Westmount Square, Montréal, Québec, H3Z 2P9, 89 p.
20. KELLEY D., CORDONE A., DELISLE G., 1960. A Method to Determine the Volume of Flow Required by Trout Below Dams: A Proposal for Investigation, California Dept. of Fish and Game.
21. KITE G.W., 1978. Frequency and Risk Analysis in Hydrology, Water Resources Publications, Fort Collins, CO, 224 p.
22. KULIK B., 1990. A method to refine the New England aquatic base flow policy. Rivers, 1, 8-22.
23. LECLERC M., BOURDREAU P., BECHARA J., BELZILE L., VILLENEUVE D., 1994. Modélisation de la dynamique de l'habitat des jeunes stades de saumon atlantique (Salmo salar) de la rivière Ashuapmushuan (Québec, Canada). Bull. Fr. Pêche Piscic., 332, 11-32.
24. LEONARD P.M., ORTH D.J., 1988. Use of habitat guilds of fishes to determine instream flow requirements. N. Am. J. Fish. Manag., 8, 399-409.
25. MILHOUS R., UPDIKE M., SNYDER D., 1989. PHABSIM system reference manual: version 2, Instream Flow Information Paper no 26, US Fish and Wildlife Service FWS/OBS 89/16. 8 chapters and 6 appendix.
26. MORANTZ D.L, SWEENEY R.K., SHIRVELL C.S., LONGARD D.A., 1987. Selection of microhabitat in summer by juvenile Atlantic salmon (Salmo salar). Can. J. Fish. Aquat. Sci., 44, 120-129.
27. NORTHERN GREAT PLAINS RESOURCE PROGRAM (NGPRP), 1974. Instream Needs Sub-Group Report, Work Group C. Water, 35 p.
28. PÊCHES et OCÉANS, 1986. Politique de Gestion de l'Habitat du Poisson, MPO/3209, Ottawa, 29 p.
29. POUILLY M., VALENTIN S., CAPRA H., GINOT V., SOUCHONY., 1995. Méthodes des microhabitat: principes et protocoles d'application. Bull. Fr. Pêche Piscic., 336, 41-54.
30. RANDALL R.G., 1981. Production rate of juvenile Atlantic Salmon (Salmo salar L.) in relation to available food in two Miramichi River, N.B., nursery streams, Ph.D. thesis, Universtiy of New-Brunswick, Fredericton, NB, 218 p.
31. REISER D.W., WESCHE T.A., ESTES C., 1989. Status of instream flow legislation and practices in North America. Fisheries, 14, 22-29.
32. SCRUTON D., HEGGENES J., VALENTIN S., HARBY A., BAKKEN T.H., 1996. Field sampling design and spatial scale in habitat-hydraulic modelling: Comparison of three models. Ecohydraulics 2000, Volume B, pp. 307-321.
33. SOUCHON Y., TROCHERIE F., FRAGNOUD E., LACOMBE C., 1989. Les modèles numériques des microhabitats des poissons: application et nouveaux développements. Revue des Sciences de l'Eau, 2, 807-830.
34. STRAHLER A.N. 1964. Quantitative geomorphology of drainage basins and channel networks, section 4-II, in Handbook of Applied Hydrology, ed. by V.T. Chow, pp. 4-39, 4-76, McGraw-Hill, NY.
35. TENNANT D.L., 1976. Instream flow regimens for fish, wildlife, recreation and related environmental resources, J.F. Orsborn and C.H. Allman (eds), Proc. Symp. and Spec. Conf. on Instream Flow Needs, Vol. II, Amer. Fish. Soc., Bethesda, MD, pp. 359-373.
36. USFWS, 1981. Interim Regional Policy for New England Stream Flow Recommendations, Memorandum from H.N. Larsen, Director, Region 5 of US Fish and Wildlife Service, Newton Corner, Massachusetts, 3 p.
37. VALENTIN S., WASSON J.G., PHILIPPE M., 1995. Effects of hydropower peaking on epilithon and inverterbrate community trophic structure, Regulated Rivers: Research and Management, 10, 105-109.
38. WESCHE T.A., RECHARD P.A., 1980. A Summary of Instream Flow Methods for Fisheries and Related Research Needs, Water Resources Research Institute, University of Wyoming, Laramie, WY, 122 p.