Technical advantages of digital EEG

Journal of Clinical Neurophysiology

Volumn 15, Issue 6, 1998, Pages 464-475

  Van Cott, Anne ^a,b   Brenner, Richard P ^a  

^a UNIVERSITY OF PITTSBURGH SCHOOL OF MEDICINE   (United States)

^b VETERANS AFFAIRS MEDICAL CENTER   (United States)

Author keywords

Analog EEG; Digital EEG; Reformatting; Technical advantages

Indexed keywords

ARTICLE; BIOMEDICAL ENGINEERING; DIAGNOSTIC ACCURACY; DIGITAL COMPUTER; DIGITAL FILTERING; ELECTROENCEPHALOGRAM; IMAGE DISPLAY; MEDICAL INSTRUMENTATION; TECHNOLOGY;

ADULT; AGED; ELECTROENCEPHALOGRAPHY; FEMALE; HUMANS; MALE; MIDDLE AGED; MONITORING, PHYSIOLOGIC; SEIZURES; SIGNAL PROCESSING, COMPUTER-ASSISTED;

EID: 0032442850     PISSN: 07360258     EISSN: None     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1097/00004691-199811000-00003     Document Type: Article

References (15)

1. American Electroencephalographic Society. Guideline 13 - guidelines for standard electrode position of nomenculature. J Clin Neurophysiol 1994a;11:111-13.
2. American Electroencephalographic Society. Guidelines for recording clinical EEG on digital media. J Clin Neurophysiol 1994b;11: 114-15.
3. Arenas AM, Brenner RP, Reynolds CF. Temporal slowing in the elderly revisited. Am J EEG Technol 1986;26:105-14.
4. Brenner RB, Scheuer ML. Cross-country digital EEG survey 1998. J Clin Neurophysiol 1998;15:485-8.
5. Ebersole JS, Wade PB. Spike voltage topography identifies two types of frontotemporal epileptic foci. Neurology 1991;41:1425-33.
6. Ebersole JS. Non-invasive localization of the epileptogenic focus by EEG dipole modeling. Acta Neurol Scand Suppl 1994;125:20-28.
7. Gotman J, Gloor P, Schaul N. Comparison of traditional reading of the EEG and automatic recognition of interictal epileptic activity. Electroencephalogr Clin Neurophysiol 1978;44:48-60.
8. Gotman J, Wang L. State dependent spike detection: validation. Electroencephalogr Clin Neurophysiol 1992;83:12-18.
9. Levy SR, Berg AT, Testa FM, Novotny EJ, Chiappa KH. Comparison of digital and conventional electroencephalogram (EEG) interpretation (Abstract). Epilepsia 1994;35(suppl 8):127.
10. Levy SR, Berg AT, Testa FM, Novotny EJ, Chiappa KH. Comparison of digital and conventional EEG interpretation. J Clin Neurophysiol 1998;15:476-80.
11. Nuwer M. Assessment of digital EEG, quantitative EEG, and EEG brain mapping: report of the American Academy of Neurology and the American Clinical Neurophysiology Society. Neurology 1997;49:277-92.
12. Nuwer MR, Lehmann D, da Silva FL, Matsuoka S, Sutherling W, Vibert J-F. IFCN guidelines for topographic and frequency analysis of EEGs and EPs. Report of an IFCN committee. Electroencephalogr Clin Neurophysiol 1994;91:1-5.
13. Webber WRS, Litt B, Lesser RP, Fisher RS, Bankman I. Automatic EEG spike detection: what should the computer imitate? Electroencephalogr Clin Neurophysiol 1993;87:364-73.
14. Wong PKH. Digital EEG in clinical practice. Philadelphia: Lippincott-Raven, 1996.
15. Wong PKH. Introduction to brain topography. New York: Plenum Press, 1991.