Discretion, disparity or discrepancy? a review of sentencing consistency

Psychiatry, Psychology and Law

Volumn 5, Issue 2, 1998, Pages 237-247

  Casey, S N ^a   Wilson, J C ^a  

^a UNIVERSITY OF SYDNEY   (Australia)

Author keywords

[No Author keywords available]

Indexed keywords

AUSTRALIA; CRIME; CRIMINAL JUSTICE; DECISION MAKING; LEGAL ASPECT; METHODOLOGY; OFFENDER; PUNISHMENT; REVIEW;

EID: 0032442334     PISSN: 13218719     EISSN: 19341687     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1080/13218719809524937     Document Type: Article

References (110)

1. Acker, J.R. (1993). A different agenda: The Supreme Court, empirical research, evidence, and capital punishment decisions, 1986–1989. Law and Sonety Review, 27(1), 67–88.
2. Aguirre, A. ‖ Baker, D.V. (1990). Empirical research on racial discrimination in the imposition of the death penalty. Criminal Justice Abstracts, 135–151.
3. Albonetti, C.A. (1991). An integration of theories to explain judicial discretion. Social Problems, 38(2), 247–263.
4. Ashworth, A. (1984). Techniques for guidance on sentencing. The Criminal Law Review, 519–530.
5. Ashworth, A., Genders, E., Mansfield, G., Peay, J. ‖ Player, E. (1984). Sentencing in the Crown Court: Report of an exploratory study. Occasional Paper No. 10, Centre for Criminological Research, University of Oxford.
6. Australian Law Reform Commission (1980). Sentencing of Federal offenders: Report No. 15 Interim. Canberra: Australian Government Publishing Service.
7. Bagby, R.M., Parker, J.D., Rector, N.A., ‖ Kalemba, V. (1994). Racial prejudice in the Canadian legal system. Law and Human Behavior, 18(3), 339–350.
8. Baldus, D., Pulaski, C., ‖ Woodworth, G. (1983). Comparative review of death sentences: An empirical study of the Georgia experience. Journal of Criminal Law and Criminology, 74,661–753.
9. Biles, D. (1993). Alternatives to imprisonment. Paper to Victorian Department of Community Welfare Services Master Plan Group, Melbourne, October 1983.
10. Biles, D. (1996). Custody, crime and the community. Current Issues in CriminalJustice, 7(3), 325–339.
11. Brown, I., ‖ Hullen, R. (1992). A study of sentencing in Leeds Magistrates’ Courts. British Journal of Criminology, 32(1) 41–53.
12. Carroll, J.S., Perkowitz, W.T., Lurigio, A.J., ‖ Weaver, F.M. (1987) Sentencing goals, causal attributes, ideology, and personality. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 52(1), 107–118.
13. Casey, S. (1996). Extra-legal factors and guilty plea penalties: An observational study in the Magistrates Courts. Unpublished Honours Thesis. Adelaide: University of South Australia.
14. Chan, J., ‖ Zdenkowski, G. (1986). Just Alternatives Part I. Australian and New Zealand Journal of Criminology, 19, 67–90.
15. Chan, J., ‖ Zdenkowski, G. (1986). Just Alternatives Part II. Australian and New Zealand Journal of Criminology, 19, 131–154.
16. Chiricos, T.G., ‖ Waldo, G.P. (1975). Socioeconomic status and criminal sentencing: An empirical assessment of a conflict proposition. American Sociological Review, 40,753–772.
17. Corns, C. (1990). Destructuring sentencing decisionmaking in Victoria. Australian and New Zealand Journal of Criminology, 23, 145–157.
18. Croft, J. (1984). Crime, punishment and penal policy. Criminal Law Review, 531–537.
19. Crow, I., ‖ Cove, J. (1984). Ethnic minorities and the courts. Criminal Law Review, 413–417.
20. Daly, (1987). Discrimination in the criminal courtds; family, gender and the problem of equal treatment. Social Forces, 66, 152–175.
21. Darby, B.W., ‖ Jeffers, D. (1988). The effects of defendant and juror attractiveness on simulated courtroom trial decisions. Social Behavior and Personality, 16, 39–50.
22. Dermer, M., ‖ Thiel, D.L. (1975). When beauty may fail. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 31, 1168–1176.
23. Diamond, (1981). Exploring sources of sentencing disparity. In B.D. Sales (Ed.). The trial process: Perspectives in law and psychology (Vol.2). New York: Plenum.
24. Diamond, S.S. (1989). Using psychology to control law. Law and Human Behavior, 13(3), 239–252.
25. Dion, K.K. (1974). Children’s physical attractiveness and sex as determinants of adult punitiveness. Developmental Psychology, 10, 772–778.
26. Douglas, R. (1987). Is chivalry dead? Gender and sentence in Victorian Magistrates’ Courts. Australian Journal of Criminology, 25(1), 343–357.
27. Douglas, R. (1988). Tolerated contests: Plea and sentence in the Victorian Magistrates’ Courts. Journal of Criminal Justice, 16, 269–290.
28. Douglas, R. (1989). Does the magistrate matter? Sentencers and sentence in the Victorian Magistrates’ Courts. Law and Human Behavior, 13,241–251.
29. Downs, A.C., ‖ Lyons, P.M. (1991). Natural observations of the links between attractiveness and initial legal judgments. Personality and Social Psychology Bulletin, 17(5), 541–547.
30. Durham, A.M, III (1993). Public opinion regarding sentences for crime: Docs it exist? Journal of CriminalJustice, 21(1), 1–11.
31. Eagley, A.H., Ashmore, R.D., Makhijani, M.G., ‖ Longo, L.C. (1991). What is beautiful is good, but … A meta-analytic review of research on the physical attractiveness stereotype. Psychological Bulletin, 110(1), 109–128.
32. Emmison, M. (1991). Conceptualising class consciousness. In J. Baxter, M. Emmison, ‖ J. Western (Eds.). Class analysis and contemporary Australia. Melbourne: Macmillan Australia.
33. Ericson, R., £C Baranek, P.M. (1982). The ordering of justice: A study of accused persons as dependents in the criminal process. Toronto: University of Toronto Press.
34. Everson, G. (1919). The human element in justice. Journal of Criminal Law and Criminology, 10, 90–99.
35. Feeley, M.M. (1979). The process of punishment: Handling cases in a lower criminal court. New York: Russell Sage Foundation.
36. Feingold, A. (1992). Good-looking people are not what we think. Psychological Bulletin, 111(2), 304–341.
37. Findlay, M, Odgers, S. ‖ Yeo, S. (1994). Australian criminal justice. Melbourne: Oxford University Press.
38. Fiske, S.T. (1995). Social cognition. In A. Tesser (ed) Advanced Social Psychology. New York: McGraw Hill.
39. Forgas, D.P. (1987). The role of physical attractiveness in the interpretation of facial expression cues. Personality and Social Psychology Bulletin, 13, 478–479.
40. Fox, R.G. (1987). Controlling sentencers. Australian and New Zealand Journal of Criminology, 10, 218–246.
41. Gibson, J.L. (1980). Environmental constraints on the behavior of judges: A representational model of judicial decision-making. Law and Society Review, 14(2), 343–370.
42. Gordon, RA. (1990). Attributions for blue-collar and white-collar crime: The cffectsof subject and defendant race on simulated juror decisions. Journal of Applied Social Psychology, 20(12), 971–983.
43. Gordon, RA. (1993). The effect of strong versus weak evidence on the assessment of race stereotypic and race non-stereotypic crimes. Journal of Applies Social Psychology, 23, 734–749.
44. Gordon, RA., Bindrim, TA., McNicholas, M.L., ‖ Walden, T.L. (1988). Perceptions of blue-collar and white-collar crime: The effect of defendant race on simulated jury decisions. Journal of Social Psychology, 128, 191–197.
45. Green, G. (1996). The concept of uniformity in sentencing. The Australian Law Journal, 70, 112–124.
46. Grossman, J.G. (1966). Social backgrounds and judicial decision making. Havard Law Review, 79, 1551–1564.
47. Hagan, J. (1974). Extra-legal attributes and criminal sentencing: An assessment of a sociological viewpoint. Law and Society
48. Hagan, J. (1975). Law, order and sentencing: A study of attitude in acton. Sociomctry, 38(2), 374–384.
49. Hagan, J., ‖ Bumiller, K. (1983). Making sense of sentencing: A review and critique of sentencing research, ln A. Blumstein, J. Cohen, S.E. Martin, ‖ M. Tonry (Eds.). Research on sentencing: The search for reform (Vol II). Washington: National Academy Press.
50. Henning, T. (1995). Psychological explanations in sentencing women in Tasmania. Australian and New Zealand Journal of Criminology, 28, 298–322.
51. Ho, R., ‖ Venus, M. (1995). Reactions to a battered woman who kills her abusive spouse: An attribu-tional analysis. Australian Journal of Psychology, 47,153–159.
52. Hoffman, E. (1981). Social class correlates of perceived offender typicality. Psychological Reports, 49, 347–350.
53. Hogarth, J. (1971). Sentencing as a human process. Toronto: University ofToronto Press.
54. Hood, R. (1962). Sentencing in Magistrates’ Courts. London: Stevens.
55. Hood, R. (1995). Race and sentencing: A reply. Criminal Law Review, 272–279.
56. Indermaur, D. (1996). Offender psychology and sentencing. Australian Psychologist, 31(1), 15–19.
57. Jefferson, T., ‖ Walker, MA. (1992). Ethnic minorities in the criminal justice system. Criminal Law Review, 83–95.
58. Karpardis, A. (1985). Sentencing by English magistrates as a human process. Nicosia: Assclia Publishers.
59. Kapardis, A. (1997). Psychology and law: A critical introduction. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
60. Kapardis, A. ‖ Farrington, D.P. (1981). An experimental study of sentencing by magistrates. Law and Human Behavior, 5, 107–121.
61. Keil, T.J. ‖ Vito, G.F. (1990). Race and the death penalty in Kentucky murder trials: An analysis of post-Gregg outcomes. Justice Quarterly, 7, 189–207.
62. Kirby, M. (1991). Human rights: The role of the judge. Polemics, 2(2), 117–120.
63. Konecni, V.J., ‖ Ebbesen, E.G. (1979). External validity of research in legal psychology. Law and Human Behavior, 3, 39–70.
64. Konecni, V.J., ‖ Ebbesen, E.G. (1982). The criminal justice system: A social psychological analysis. San Francisco: W.J. Freeman ‖ Co.
65. Lawrence, J.A. (1988). Expertise on the bench: Modelling magistrates’ judicial decision-making. In M.T.H. Chi, R. Glaser, ‖ M. Farr (Eds). The nature of expertise. Hillsdale, N.J.: Earlbaum Associates.
66. Lawrence, J.A. (1994). Sentencing processes and decisions: Influences and interpretations. In G. Hanlon, J. Jackson ‖ A Atkinson (Eds.) Judging and decision making. Second Annual Conference, Institute for the Study of the Legal Profession, Faculty of Law, University of Sheffield, September 1994.
67. Lawrence, JA., ‖ Home!, R. (1987). Sentencing in Magistrates’ Courts: The Magistrate as professional decision-maker. In I. Potas (Ed.) Sentencing in Australia: Issues, policy and reform. Seminar Proceedings, Australian Institute of Criminology, March 1986.
68. Lawrence, J.A. ‖ Valsiner, J. (1993). Conceptual roots of internalization from transmission to transformation. Human Development, 36(3), 150–168.
69. Lotz, R. ‖ Hewitt, J.D. (1977). The influence of legally irrelevant factors on felony sentencing. Sociological Inquiry, 47,347–60.
70. Lovegrove, A. (1984). An empirical study of sentencing disparity among judges in an Australian criminal court. International Review of Applied Psychology, 33,161–176.
71. Mackay, R.D. (1993). The consequences of killing very young children. Criminal Law Review, 21–30.
72. Mair, G. (1986). Ethnic minorities, probation and the courts. British Journal of Criminology, 26, 147–155.
73. Mazzella, R., ‖ Feingold, A. (1994). The effects of physical attractiveness, race, socio-economic status, and gender of defendants and victims on judgments of mock jurors: A meta-analysis. Journal of Applied Social Psychology, 24(15), 1315–1344.
74. McKelvie, S.J. (1993). Stereotyping in perception of attractiveness, age, and gender in schematic faces. Social Behavior and Personality, 21(2), 121–128.
75. McPherson, S., Snyder, P., McPherson, D., ‖ DeMarco, A. (1996). Decision-making in death penalty cases: A retrospective analysis. Paper presented at the American Psychology and Law Conference, Hilton Head, South Carolina, USA.
76. Morris, T. (1984). A grammar for sentencers. New Society, 1125,419–421.
77. Nagel, l.H. (1983). The legal-extra-legal controversy: Judicial decisions in pretrial release. Law and Society Review, 17(3), 481–515.
78. Norbis v Norbis (1986) 161 Commonwealth Law Reports 513
79. Palys, T.S., ‖ Divorski, S. (1986). Explaining sentencing disparity. Canadian Journal of Criminology, 28,347–362.
80. Police v Cadd, Had, Illes, Vlachos dr Quinn, Unreported Judgment No. S6187, Supreme Court of South Australia, 1 July 1997.
81. Polk, K., ‖ Tait, D. (1988). The use of imprisonment by the Magistrates’ Courts. Australian and New ZealandJournal of Criminology, 22, 31–44.
82. Rapaport, E. (1991). The death penalty and gender discrimination. Law and Society Review, 25, 367–383.
83. Richardson, I.L.M. (1985). The role of judges as policy makers. Victorian University of Wellington Law Review, 15(1), 46–52.
84. R v Williscroft, Weston, Woodely and Robinson [1975] Victorian Reports 292.
85. Rumgay, J. (1995). Custodial decision making in Magistrates’ Courts. British Journal of Criminology, 35(2), 201–217.
86. Sallmann, P., ‖ Willis, J. (1984). Taking sentencing seriously. Australian and New Zealand Journal of Criminology, 17, 133–148.
87. Sallmann, P., ‖ Willis, J. (1987). Criminal justice in Australia. Melbourne: Oxford University Press.
88. Satrapa, A, Melhado, M.B., Coelho, M.M.C., Otta, E., Taubemblatt, R., ‖ Siqueira, W.D.F. (1992).
89. Influence of style of dress on formation of first impressions. Perceptual and Motor Skills, 74, 159–162.
90. Shapland, J. (1981). Between conviction and sentence. London: Roudedge ‖ Kegan Paul.
91. Shapland, J. (1987). Who controls sentencing? Influences on the sentencer. In D.C. Pennington and S.MA Lloyd-Bostock (eds), The psychology of sentencing: Approaches to consistency and disparity. Oxford: Centre for Socio-Legal Studies.
92. Smith, A.G. ‖ Blumberg, A.S. (1967). The problem of objectivity in judicial decision-making, Social Forces, 46, 96–105.
93. Solimine, M.E., ‖ Wheatley, S.E. (1995). Rethinking feminist judging. Indiana Law Journal, 70, 891–920.
94. Spreutels, J.P. (1980). Giving reasons for sentence at the Crown Court. Criminal Law Review, 846–895.
95. Steffensmeier, D.J., Kramer, J. ‖ Streifei, C. (1993). Gender and imprisonment decisions. Criminology, 31, 411–446.
96. Sterwart, J.E. (1980). Defendant’s attractiveness as a factor in the outcome of criminal trials: An observational study. Journal of Applied Social Psychology, 10(4), 348–361.
97. Stewart, J.E. (1985). Appearance and punishment: The attraction-Ieniency effect in the courtroom. Journal of Social Psychology, 125(3), 373–378.
98. Thomas, DA. (1979). Principles of sentencing (2”d ed.). London: Heincmann.
99. Tonry, M. (1996). Sentencing matters. New York: Oxford University Press.
100. Victorian Attorney-General’s Department (1988). Sentencing – The Victorian Sentencing Committee Report. Melbourne, Australia.
101. Walker, J. ‖ McDonald, D. (1995). The over-representation of indigenous people in custody in Australia. Trends and Issues in Crime and Criminal Justice, No 47. Canberra: Australian Institute of Criminology.
102. Weatherburn, D. (1988). Sentencing principles and sentence choice. In M. Findlay ‖ R. Hogg (Eds.) Understanding crime and criminal justice. Sydney: The Law Book Co. Ltd.
103. Weatherburn, D., ‖ Lind, B. (1996). Sentence disparity, judge shopping and trial court delay. Australian and New Zealand Journal of Criminology, 29, 147–165.
104. Wuensch, K.L., Ghia, R.C., Castello, WA., Chuang, C.J., and Cheng, B.S. (1993). Effects of physical attractiveness, sex, and type of crime on mock juror decisions. Journal of Cross-Cultural Psycholog, 24(40), 414–427.
105. Wilczyński, A. ‖ Morris, A. (1993). Parents who kill their children. Criminal Law Review, 31–36.
106. Willbanks, W. (1986). Are female felons treated more leniently by the criminal justice system? Justice Quarterly, 3, 517–529.
107. Wrightsman, L.S., Nietzel, M.T., ‖ Fortune, W.H. (1998). Psychology dr the legal system (4‘k ed.). Pacific Grove: Brooks/Cole Publishing Company.
108. Wundersitz, J., Castle, C., ‖ Marshall, J. (1997). Aboriginal people and the criminal justice system. Report 1: Comparison of Aboriginal and nonaboriginal cases finalised in the Magistrates Courts of South Australia, 1995. Adelaide, South Australia: Attorney-Generals Department.
109. Yardley v Betts (1979) 22 South Australian State Reports 108.
110. Zambie, E. ‖ Kaim, K.L. (1990). Genderal and specific measures of public attitudes towards sentencing. Canadian Journal of Behavioural Sciences, 22(3), 327–337.