Choosing not to choose in comparative policy research design: The case of the Research Network on Gender, Politics, and the State

Policy Studies Journal

Volumn 26, Issue 3, 1998, Pages 384-397

  Mazur, Amy G ^a   Parry, Janine ^a  

^a NONE

Author keywords

[No Author keywords available]

Indexed keywords

ACADEMIC RESEARCH; GENDER ROLE; POLICY ANALYSIS;

UNITED STATES;

EID: 0032440303     PISSN: 00190292     EISSN: None     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: None     Document Type: Article

References (55)

1. Acker, J. (1992). Gendered institutions: From sex roles to gendered institutions. Contemporary Sociology, 21, 565-569.
2. Ashford, D. E. (Ed). (1992). History and context in comparative public policy. Pittsburgh, PA: University of Pittsburgh Press.
3. Black, N. (1989). Social feminism. Ithaca, NY: Cornell University Press.
4. Bunce, V. (1981). Do leaders make a difference? Exclusive succession and public policy under capitalism and socialism. Princeton, NJ: Princeton University Press.
5. Caporaso, J. A. (1995). Research design, falsification, and the qualitative-quantitative divide. American Political Science Review, 89(2), 457-460.
6. Carroll, S. J., & Zerilli, L. M. G. (1993). Feminist challenges to political science. In A. Finifter (Ed.), The state of the discipline II (pp. 55-76). Washington DC: American Political Science Association.
7. Cobb, R. W., & Elder, C. D. (1983). Participation in American politics: The dynamics of agenda -setting. Baltimore, MD: Johns Hopkins University Press.
8. Collier, D. (1993). The comparative method. In A. Finifter (Ed.), Political science: The state of the discipline II (pp. 105-119). Washington DC: American Political Science Association.
9. Collier, D. (1995). Translating quantitative methods for qualitative researchers: The case of selection bias. American Political Science Review, 89 (2), 461-466.
10. Collier, D. & Levitsky, S. (1997). Democracy with adjectives: Conceptual innovation in comparative research. World Politics, 49(3), 430-451.
11. Collier, D., & Mahon, J. E. (1993). Conceptual "stretching" revisited: Adapting categories in comparative analysis. American Political Science Review, 87(4), 845-855.
12. deLeon, P. (1994). Democracy and the policy sciences. Policy Studies Journal, 22 (2), 200-212.
13. Esping-Andersen, G. (1990). The three worlds of welfare capitalism. Cambridge: Polity Press.
14. Feldman, E. (1978). Comparative public policy: Field or method. Comparative Politics, 10, 278-305.
15. Fischer, F., & Forester, J. (Eds.). (1993). The argumentative turn in policy analysis and planning. Durham, NC: Duke University Press.
16. Gamson, W. A. (1988). Political discourse: Collective action. In B. Klandermans, H. Kriesi, & S. Tarrow (Eds.), International Social Movement Research, Vol. 1 (pp. 219-244). Greenwich, CT: JAI Press.
17. Geddes, B. (1994). Politician's dilemma: Building state capacity in Latin America. Berkeley, CA: University of California Press.
18. George, A., & McKeown, T. J. (1985). Case studies and theories of organization decisionmaking. Advances in Information Processes in Organizations, 2, 21-58.
19. Hancock, D. M. (1983). Comparative public policy: An assessment. In A. Finifter (Ed.), Political science: The state of the discipline (pp. 283-308). Washington DC: American Political Science Association.
20. Harrop, M. (Ed.). (1992). Power and policy in liberal democracies. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
21. Hayward, J. (1992). The policy community approach to industrial policy. In D. A. Rustow & K. P. Erickson (Eds.), Comparative political dynamics: Global research perspectives (pp. 381-407). New York, NY: HarperCollins.
22. Heidenheimer, A. J., Heclo, H. H., & Adams, C. T. (1983). Comparative public policy: The politics of social choice in Europe and America. New York, NY: St. Martin's Press.
23. King, G., Keohane, R. O., & Verba, S. (1994). Designing social inquiry: Scientific inference in qualitative research. Princeton, NJ: Princeton University Press.
24. King, G., Keohane, R. O., & Verba, S. (1995). The importance of research design in political science. American Political Science Review, 89(2), 475-481.
25. Laitin, D. (1995). Disciplining political science. American Political Science Review, 89(2), 454-456.
26. LaPalombara, J. (1968, October). Macrotheories and microapplications in comparative politics: A widening chasm. Comparative Politics, 1, 52-78.
27. Leichter, H. (1977). Comparative public policy: Problems and prospects. Policy Studies Journal, 5, 583-596.
28. Lijphart, A. (1971). Comparative politics and comparative method. American Political Science Review, 65, 682-693.
29. Lijphart, A. (1984). Democracies: Patterns of majoritarian and consensus government in twenty-one countries. New Haven, CT: Yale University Press.
30. MacKinnon, C. (1989). Toward a feminist theory of the state. Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press.
31. Mazur, A. G. (1993, Spring). Sexual harassment policy in France: Another case of French "exceptionalism?" French Politics and Society, 11 (2), 12-31.
32. Merton, R. K. [1949] (1968). Social theory and social structure. New York, NY: Free Press.
33. Molyneux, M. (1985). Mobilization with emancipation? Women's interests, the state and revolution in Nicaragua. Feminist Studies 11 (2), 227-255.
34. Pitkin, H. F. (1967). The concept of representation. Berkeley, CA: University of California Press.
35. Przeworski, A. (1991). Democracy and the market: Political and economic reforms in Eastern Europe and Latin America. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
36. Przeworski, A., & Teune, H. (1970). The logic of comparative social inquiry. New York, NY: Wiley.
37. Putnam, C. C. (1993). Making democracy work: Civic traditions in modern Italy. Princeton, NJ: Princeton University Press.
38. Randall, V. (1991). Feminism and political analysis. Political Studies, 39, 513-532.
39. Rochon, T. R., & Mazmanian, D. A. (1993). Social movements and the policy process. Annals of the American Academy of Political and Social Science, 528, 75-87.
40. Sartori, G. (1970). Concept misformation in comparative politics. American Political Science Review, 64 (4), 1033-1053.
41. Schattschneider, E. E. (1960). The semisovereign people: A realist's view of democracy in America. New York, NY: Holt, Rinehart and Winston.
42. Schneider, A., & Ingram, H. (1993). Social construction of target populations: Implications for politics and policy. American Political Science Review, 87, 334-347.
43. Skocpol, T. (1988, August 31). Comparing national systems of social provision: A polity-centered approach. Paper presented at the International Political Science Association meeting, Washington, DC.
44. Smith, G. (1989). Politics in Western Europe. New York, NY: Holmes & Meier.
45. Snow, D. A., & Benford, R. D. (1992). Master frames and cycles of protest In A. D. Morris & C. McClurg Mueller (Eds.), Frontiers in social movement theory (pp. 35-52). New Haven, CT: Yale University Press.
46. Stetson, D. M., & Mazur, A. G. (1995a). Comparative state feminism. Newbury Park, CA: Sage.
47. Stetson, D. M., & Mazur, A. G. (1995b). Introduction. In D. M. Stetson & A. G. Mazur (Eds.), Comparative state feminism (pp. 1-21). Newbury Park, CA: Sage.
48. Stetson, D. M., & Mazur, A. G. (1995c). Sourcebook for the joint workshop on comparative state feminism. Leiden, The Netherlands: Rijks Universiteit.
49. Stetson, D. M., & Mazur, A. G. (1997, February 5-9). Workshop final report: Methodological approaches to the comparative study of gender and policy debates. Women/Politics: The Newsletter of the Organized Section for Women and Politics Research, 25-32.
50. Stetson, D. M., & Mazur, A. G. (1998). The impact of women's movements on the state: State feminism in France and the United States. Manuscript submitted for publication.
51. Stone, D. A. (1988). Policy paradox and political reason. Glenview, IL: Scott, Foresman.
52. Tarrow, S. (1994). Power in movement: Collective action, social movement. New York, NY: Cambridge University Press.
53. Tarrow, S. (1995). Bridging the quantitative-qualitative divide in political science. American Political Science Review, 89(2), 457-460.
54. United Nations. (1993). Directory of national machinery for the advancement of women. Vienna: Division for the Advancement of Women.
55. Wiarda, H. J. (1993). Introduction to comparative politics: Concepts and processes. Belmont, CA: Wadsworth.