Mammography facility trends across Wisconsin

Wisconsin Medical Journal

Volumn 97, Issue 11, 1998, Pages 39-42

  Propeck, Pamela A ^a,b   Scanlan, Kathleen A ^a  

^a UNIVERSITY OF WISCONSIN SCHOOL OF MEDICINE AND PUBLIC HEALTH   (United States)

^b University of Wisconsin Health   (United States)

Author keywords

[No Author keywords available]

Indexed keywords

BREAST CANCER; BREAST EXAMINATION; CANCER SCREENING; DIAGNOSTIC IMAGING; GOOD CLINICAL PRACTICE; HEALTH CARE FACILITY; HUMAN; MAMMOGRAPHY; RADIOLOGIST; REVIEW;

BREAST NEOPLASMS; BREAST SELF-EXAMINATION; DATA COLLECTION; FEMALE; HEALTH SERVICES ACCESSIBILITY; HEALTH SURVEYS; HUMANS; MAMMOGRAPHY; PREGNANCY; QUESTIONNAIRES; WISCONSIN; WOMEN'S HEALTH SERVICES;

EID: 0032436477     PISSN: 00436542     EISSN: None     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: None     Document Type: Review

References (8)

1. Hawes D with reply by Eklund GW. Letter to the Editor: Collapse of a breast implant after mammography. AJR 1990; 154.1345-1346.
2. Quality Determinants of Mammography. Clinical Practice Guideline 1994; 13:1.
3. Dershaw DD. The false-negative mammogram. Applied Radiology, September 1994: p.27-29.
4. Wilson T, Nijhawan V, Helvie M Normal mammograms and the practice of obtaining previous mammograms: Usefulness and costs. Radiology 1996; 198: 661-663.
5. Yanes Hoffman N, Janus J, Destounis S, Logann-Young W. When the patient asks for the results of her mammograms, how should the radiologist reply? AJR 1994; 162 597-599.
6. Liu S, Bassett L, Sayre J Women's attitudes about receiving mammographic results directly from radiologist. Radiology 1994; 193:783-786.
7. Ecklund GW. Mammographic compression: Science or art? Radiology 1991; 181:339-341.
8. Brenner RJ, Eklund GW. Breast implant rupture and mammography. ACR 1997, 53:27.