A mathematical model of luteinizing hormone release from ovine pituitary cells in perifusion

American Journal of Physiology - Endocrinology and Metabolism

Volumn 275, Issue 6 38-6, 1998, Pages

  Heinze, K ^a,b   Keener, R W ^a   Midgley Jr , A R ^a  

^a UNIVERSITY OF MICHIGAN   (United States)

^b PFIZER INC   (United States)

Author keywords

Desensitization; Gonadotropin releasing hormone; Secretion

Indexed keywords

GONADORELIN; LUTEINIZING HORMONE;

ANIMAL CELL; ARTICLE; CONTROLLED STUDY; HYPOPHYSIS CELL; LUTEINIZING HORMONE RELEASE; MATHEMATICAL MODEL; NONHUMAN; NONLINEAR SYSTEM; PERFUSION; PRIORITY JOURNAL; RECEPTOR DOWN REGULATION; SHEEP;

EID: 0032435903     PISSN: 01931849     EISSN: None     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1152/ajpendo.1998.275.6.e1061     Document Type: Article

References (16)

1. Akaike, H. A new look at statistical model discrimination. IEEE Trans. Automat. Control 19: 716-723, 1974.
2. Bremner, W. J., and C. A. Paulsen. Two pools of luteinizing hormone in evidence from constant administration of the human pituitary: luteinizing hormone releasing hormone. J. Clin. Endocrinol. Metab. 39: 811-815, 1974.
3. Childs, G. V. Division of labor among gonadotropes. Vitam. Horm. 50: 215-286, 1995.
4. Clarke, I. J., and J. T. Cummins. GnRH pulse frequency determines LH pulse amplitude by altering the amount of releasable LH in the pituitary glands of ewes. J. Reprod. Fertil. 73: 425-431, 1985.
5. Clarke, I. J., J. T. Cummins, J. K. Findlay, K. J. Burman, and B. W. Doughton. Effects on plasma luteinizing hormone and follicle-stimulating hormone of varying the frequency and amplitude of gonadotropin-releasing hormone pulses in ovariec-tomized ewes with hypothalamo-pituitary disconnection. Neuroendocrinology 39: 214-221, 1984.
6. Duddleson, W. G., A. R. Midgley, Jr., and G. D. Niswender. Computer program sequence for analysis and summary of radioimmunoassay data. Comp. Biomed. Res. 5: 205-217, 1972.
7. Fisher, R. A. The arrangement of field experiments. J. Ministry Agric. 33: 503-513, 1950.
8. Gay, D. M., and R. E. Welsh. Maximum likelihood and quasi-likelihood for nonlinear exponential family regression models. J. Am. Stat. Assoc. 83: 990-998, 1988.
9. Gill, P. E., and W. Murray. Minimization Subject to Bounds on the Variables. National Physical Laboratory, 1976. (Tech. Rep. 72)
10. Goldbeter, A., and Y.-X. Li. Frequency coding in intercellular communication. In: Cell to Cell Signalling: From Experiments to Theoretical Models, edited by A. Goldbeter. New York: Academic, 1989, p. 415.
11. Hall, G., and J. M. Watt (Editors). Modern Numerical Methods for Ordinary Differential Equations. New York: Clarendon, 1976, chapt. 3, p. 59.
12. Kamel, F., J. A. Balz, C. L. Kubajak, and V. A. Schneider. Effects of luteinizing hormone (LH)-releasing hormone pulse amplitude and frequency on LH secretion by perifused rat anterior pituitary cells. Endocrinology 120: 1644-1650, 1987.
13. Knox, B. E., P. N. Devreotes, A. Goldbeter, and L. A. Segel. A molecular mechanism for sensory adaptation based on ligand-induced receptor modification. Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. USA 83: 2345-2349, 1986.
14. Li, Y.-X., and A. Goldbeter. Frequency specificity in intercellular communication: influence of patterns of periodic signaling on target cell response. Biophys. J. 55: 125-145, 1989.
15. Liu, T., and G. L. Jackson. Long-term superfusion of rat anterior pituitary cells: effects of repeated pulses of gonadotropin-releasing hormone at different doses, durations and frequencies. Endocrinology 115: 605-613, 1984.
16. McIntosh, J. E. A., and R. P. McIntosh. Varying the patterns and concentrations of gonadotrophin-releasing hormone stimulation does not alter the ratio of LH and FSH released from perifused sheep pituitary cells. J. Endocr. 109: 155-161, 1986.