Orders to supply as substitutes for commitments to aftermarkets

Canadian Journal of Economics

Volumn 31, Issue 5, 1998, Pages 1204-1224

  Chen, Zhiqi ^a   Ross, Thomas W ^b  

^a CARLETON UNIVERSITY   (Canada)

^b UNIVERSITY OF BRITISH COLUMBIA   (Canada)

Author keywords

[No Author keywords available]

Indexed keywords

COMPETITIVENESS; MANUFACTURING; MARKET CONDITIONS; NATIONAL TRADE;

CANADA;

EID: 0032433986     PISSN: 00084085     EISSN: None     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.2307/136467     Document Type: Article

References (21)

1. Borenstein, S., J. MacKie-Mason and J. Netz (1995a), 'Antitrust policy in aftermarkets,' Antitrust Law Journal 63, 455-82
2. _ (1995b) 'Exercising market power in proprietary aftermarkets,' mimeo, revised March Canada (Director of Investigation and Research v. Xerox Canada Inc.) 2 Nov. 1990, CT-89/4 (Comp. Tribunal)
3. Chen, Z., and T. Ross (1993), 'Refusals to deal, price discrimination and independent service organizations,' Journal of Economics and Management Strategy 2, 593-614
4. _ (1997) 'Orders to supply as substitutes for commitments to aftermarkets,' Working Paper 97-02, SFU-UBC Centre for the Study of Government and Business
5. _ (1998) 'Refusals to deal and orders to supply in competitive Markets,' forthcoming, International Journal of industrial Organization
6. Chen, Z., T. Ross, and W.T. Stanbury (1998) 'Refusals to deal and aftermarkets,' Review of Industrial Organization 13, 131-51
7. Church, J. and N. Gandal (1992) 'Network effects, software provision and standardization,' Journal of Industrial Economics 40, 85-103
8. Consumer and Corporate Affairs Canada 'Director receives, undertakings from digital equipment of Canada limited,' News Release, NR-10862/92-31, 30 October 1992
9. Dixit, A., and J. Stiglitz (1977) 'Monopolistic competition and optimum product diversity,' American Economic Review 67, 297-308
10. Dudey, M. (1990) 'Competition by choice: the effect of consumer search on firm location decisions,' American Economic Review 80, 1092-104
11. Farrel, J., and N. Gallini (1988) 'Second sourcing as a means of commitment: monopoly incentives to attract competition,' Quarterly Journal of Economics 108, 673-94
12. Grimes, W. (1994) 'Antitrust tie-in analysis after Kodak: understanding the role of market imperfections,' Antitrust Law Journal 62, 263-325
13. Hay, G. (1993) 'Is the glass half-empty or half-full?: reflections on the Kodak case' (1993), Antitrust Law Journal 62, 177-91
14. Hutton, S., and L. Hunter (1992), 'Digital equipment's undertaking to stop tied selling has implications for durable equipment manufacturers in Canada,' Canadian Competition Policy Record 13, 1-4
15. Kattan, J. (1993) 'Market power in the presence of an installed base,' Antitrust Law Journal 62, 1-21
16. Lande, R. (1993) 'Chicago takes it on the chin: imperfect information could play a crucial role in the post-Kodak world,' Antitrust Law Journal 62, 193-202
17. Shapiro, C. (1993) 'Aftermarkets and consumer welfare: making sense of Kodak,' Antitrust Law Journal 63, 483-511
18. Shapiro, C., and D. Teece (1994) 'Systems competition and aftermarkets: an economic analysis of Kodak,' Antitrust Bulletin 39, 135-62
19. Shepard, A. (1987) 'Licensing to enhance demand for new technologies,' RAND Journal of Economics 18, 360-8
20. Spivak, G., and C. Ellis (1993) 'Kodak: enlightened antitrust analysis and traditional tying law,' Antitrust Law Journal 62, 203-16
21. Wall, D. (1997) Aftermarket monopoly five years after Kodak,' Antitrust 11, (Summer), 32-8