Mode of delivery of infants with a birth weight below 2500 g. Which delivery route is the best choice during labor?;Mode d'accouchement des enfants de poids inferieur a 2 500 g. En cours de travail, quelle voie d'accouchement faut-il choisir?

Journal de Gynecologie Obstetrique et Biologie de la Reproduction

Volumn 27, Issue SUPPL. 2, 1998, Pages 295-301

  Boulot, P ^a  

^a HÔPITAL ARNAUD DE VILLENEUVE   (France)

Author keywords

[No Author keywords available]

Indexed keywords

CLINICAL PROTOCOL; CONFERENCE PAPER; DELIVERY; FRANCE; HUMAN; LABOR COMPLICATION; LOW BIRTH WEIGHT; MEDICAL DECISION MAKING;

BIRTH WEIGHT; DELIVERY, OBSTETRIC; FEMALE; GESTATIONAL AGE; HUMANS; INFANT, LOW BIRTH WEIGHT; INFANT, NEWBORN; LABOR PRESENTATION; PATIENT SELECTION; PREGNANCY; PREGNANCY OUTCOME; RISK FACTORS;

EID: 0032428549     PISSN: 03682315     EISSN: None     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: None     Document Type: Conference Paper

References (22)

1. Grant A, Penn ZJ, Steer PJ. Elective or selective caesarean delivery of the small baby ? A systematic review of the controlled trials. Br J Obstet Gynaecol 1996;703:1197-200.
2. Lumley J, Lester A, Renou P, Wood C. A failed RCT to determine the best mode of delivery for the very low birth-weight infant. Con Clin Trials 1985;6:120-7.
3. Kitchen W, Ford GW, Doyle LW, Rickards AL, Lissenden JV, Pepperell RJ, Duke JE. Cesarean section or vaginal delivery at 24 to 28 week's gestation: comparison of survival and neonatal and two-year morbidity. Obstet Gynecol 1985:66:149-57.
4. Westgren M, Dolfin T, Halperin M, Milligan J, Shennan A, Svenningsen NW, Ingemarsson. Mode of delivery in the low birth weight fetus. Delivery by cesarean section independant of fetal lie versus vaginal delivery in vertex presentation. Acta Obstet Gynecol Scand 1985;64:51-7.
5. Cibils LA, Karrison T, Brown L. Factors influencing neonatal outcomes in the very-low-birth weight fetus (< 1 500 gm) with a breech presentation. Am J Obstet Gynecol 1994;171:35-42
6. Bennebroek Gravenhorst J, Veen S, Verloove-Vanhorick SP, Verweij RA, Ens-Dokkum MH. Breech delivery in very preterm and very low birthweight infants in the Netherlands. Br J Obstet Gynaecol 1993;100:411-5.
7. Baud O, Ville Y, Zupan V, Boithias C, Lacaze- Masmonteil T, Gabilan JC, Frydman R, Dehan M. Are neonatal brain lesions due to intrauterine infection related to mode of delivery. Br J Obstet Gynaecol 1998;105:121-4.
8. Murphy DJ, Sellers S, MacKenzie IZ, Yudkin PL, Johnson AM. Case-control sudy of antenatal and intrapartum risk factors for cerebral palsy in very preterm singleton babies. Lancet 1995;346:1449-54.
9. Malloy MH, Onstad L, Wright E, The National Institute of Child Health and Human Development Neonatal Research Network. The effect of cesarean delivery on birth outcome in very low birth weight infants. Obstet Gynecol 1991;77:498-503.
10. Fetus and Newborn Committee, Canadian Paediatric Society, Maternal-Fetal Medicine Committee, Society of Obstetricians and Gynaecologists of Canada. Management of the woman with threatened birth of an infant of extremely low gestational age.
11. Robertson PA, Foran CM, Croughan-Minihane MS, Kilpatrick SJ. Head entrapment and neonatal outcome by mode of delivery in breech deliveries from 24 to 27 weeks of gestation. Am J Obstet Gynecol 1995;773:1171-6.
12. Robertson PA, Foran CM, Croughan-Minihane MS, Kilpatrick SJ. Head entrapment and neonatal outcome by mode of delivery in breech deliveries from 28 to 36 weeks of gestation. Am J Obstet Gynecol 1995:174:1742-9.
13. Van Eyk EA, Huisjes HJ. Neonatal mortality and morbidity associated with preterm breech presentation. Eur J Obstet Gynecol Reprod Biol 1983;15:17-23.
14. Bodmer B, Benjamin A, McLean FH, Usher RH. Has use of cesarean section reduced the risks of delivery in the preterm breech delivery. Am J Obstet Gynecol 1986;154:244-50.
15. Penn ZJ, Steer PJ, Grant A. A multicentre randomised controlled trial comparing elective and selective caesarean section for the delivery of the preterm breech infant. Br J Obstet Gynaecol 1996;103:684-9.
16. Penn ZJ, Steer PJ. Reasons for declining participation in a prospective randomised trial to determine the optimum mode of delivery of the preterm Breech. Con Clin Trials 1990;11:226-31.
17. Anderson G, Strong C. The premature breech : caesarean section or trial of labour? J Med Ethics 1988;14:18-24.
18. Nieto A, Villar J, Serra M, Valenzuela P, Keller J. Intrauterine growth retardation : fluctuation of fetal pH measured between beginning and at the completion of labor. J Perinat Med 1994;22:329-35.
19. Regenstein AC, Laros RK, Wakeley A, Kitterman JA, Tooley WH. Mode of delivery in pregnancies complicated by preeclampsia with very low birth weight infants. J Perinat 1995;15:2-6.
20. Kramer WB, Weiner CP. Management of intra-uterine growth restriction. Clin Obstet Gynecol 1997;40:814-23.
21. Kurjak A, Zmitanac J. Antepartum and intrapartum management of the growth retarde fetus. Clin Obstet Gynecol 1992;35:185-93.
22. Vaast P, Mathieu E, Valat-Rigot AS, Subtil D, Dufour P, Puech F. RCIU : conduite à tenir obstétricale. Reprod Hum Horm 1997;10:611-24.