Range of motion and motion patterns in patients with low back pain before and after rehabilitation

Spine

Volumn 23, Issue 23, 1998, Pages 2631-2639

  Magnusson, Marianne L ^a   Bishop, Jeffrey B ^a   Hasselquist, Leif ^a   Spratt, Kevin F ^a   Szpalski, Marek ^b   Pope, Malcolm H ^a  

^a UNIVERSITY OF IOWA   (United States)

^b Centre Hospitalier Moliere Longchamp   (Belgium)

Author keywords

Low back pain; Motion analysis; Neural network; Nonlinear classification; Rehabilitation; Symmetry analysis

Indexed keywords

ADULT; ARTICLE; ARTIFICIAL NEURAL NETWORK; CLINICAL ARTICLE; FEMALE; GONIOMETRY; HUMAN; JOINT CHARACTERISTICS AND FUNCTIONS; LOW BACK PAIN; MALE; MOTION; PRIORITY JOURNAL;

ADULT; FEMALE; HUMANS; LOW BACK PAIN; LUMBOSACRAL REGION; MALE; MIDDLE AGED; MOVEMENT; MULTIVARIATE ANALYSIS; NEURAL NETWORKS (COMPUTER); RANGE OF MOTION, ARTICULAR; RECOVERY OF FUNCTION; ROTATION; TREATMENT OUTCOME;

EID: 0032424247     PISSN: 03622436     EISSN: None     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1097/00007632-199812010-00019     Document Type: Article

References (40)

1. Andersson GBJ. The epidemiology of spinal disorders. In: Frymoyer JW ed. The Adult Spine: Principles and Practice, 2nd ed. Philadelphia: Lippincott-Raven Publishers, 1997:93-141.
2. Andersson GBJ, Deyo RA. Sensitivity, specificity, and predictive value: A general issue in screening for disease and in the interpretation of diagnostic studies in spinal disorders. In: Fry-moyer JW, ed. The Adult Spine: Principles and Practice. Philadelphia: Lippincott-Raven Publishers, 1997:305-17.
3. Andersson GBJ, Svensson HO, Oden A. The intensity of work recovery in low back pain. Spine 1983;8:880-4.
4. Anderson JAD. Back pain in industry. In: Jayson M, ed. The Lumbar Spine and Back Pain. Tunbridge Wells, Pitman Medical. New York: Grune & Stratton, Inc., 1976:29-46.
5. Battie MC, Bigos SJ, Fisher LD, et al. Isometric lifting strength as a predictor of industrial back pain reports. Spine 1989;14:851-6.
6. Bishop JB, Pope MH, Ananthraman SK, Szpalski M. Classification of movement patterns in patients with low back pain using an artificial neural network. In: Daglie CH, Akay M, Chen CLP, Fernandez BR, Ghosh J, eds. Intelligent Engineering Systems Through Artificial Neural Networks. New York: ASME Press, 1996:699-703.
7. DeLuca CJ. Use of the surface EMG signal for performance evaluation of back muscles. Muscle and Nerve 1993;16: 210-6.
8. Dorffner G, Porenta G. On using feedforward neural networks for clinical diagnostic tasks. Artificial Intelligence in Medicine 1994;6:417-35.
9. Dvorak J, Panjabi MM, Novotny JE, Chang DG, Grob D. Clinical validation of functional flexion-extension roentgenograms of the lumbar spine. Spine 1991;16:943-50.
10. Friedman JH. Multivariate adaptive regression spines. Annals of Statistics 1991;19:1-5.
11. Goel VK, Goyal S, Clark C, Nishiyama K, Nye T. Kinematics of the whole lumbar spine- effect of discectomy. Spine 1985;10:544-54.
12. Hazard RW, Fenwick JW, Kalisch SM, et al. Functional restoration with behavioral support: A one-year prospective study of patients with chronic low-back pain. Spine 1989;14: 157-61.
13. Hertz J, Krogh A, Palmer RG. Introduction to the Theory of Neural Computation. Redwood City, CA: Addison-Wesley Publishing, 1991.
14. Kaigle A, Holm S, Hansson T. Experimental instability in the lumbar spine. Spine 1995;20:421-30.
15. Kelsey J, White A, Pastides H. The impact of musculoskeletal disorders on the population of the United States. J Bone Joint Surg [Am] 1979;61:959-64.
16. Klein AB, Snyder-Mackler L, Roy SH, DeLuca CJ. Comparison of spinal mobility and isometric trunk extensor forces with electromyographic spectral analysis in identifying low back pain. Phys Ther 1991;71:445-54.
17. Knutson F. The instability associated with disc degeneration in the lumbar spine. Acta Radiol 1944;25:593-609.
18. Krag M. Three-dimensional flexibility measurements of preloaded human vertebral motion segments (thesis). New Haven, CT: Yale University School of Medicine, 1975.
19. Lindstrom I, Ohlund C, Eek C, Wallin L, Peterson LE, Nachemson A. Mobility, strength, and fitness after a graded activity program for patients with subacute low back pain: A randomized prospective clinical study with a behavioral therapy approach. Spine 1992;17:641-52.
20. Marras WS, Parnianpour M, Ferguson SA, et al. Quantification and classification of low back disorders based on trunk motion. Eur J Phys Med 1993;3:218-35.
21. Masset D, Malchaire J, Lemoine A. Static and dynamic characteristics of the trunk and history of low back pain. International Journal of Industrial Ergonomics 1993;11:279-90.
22. Mayer TG, Gatchel RJ, Kishino N, et al. Objective assessment of spine function following industrial injury: A prospective study with comparison group and a one-year follow-up. Spine 1985;10:482-93.
23. McIntyre DR, Glover LH, Conino MC, et al. A comparison of the characteristics of preferred low-back motion of normal subjects and low-back patients. J Spinal Disord 1991;3: 90-5.
24. McIntyre DR, Glover LH, Reynolds DC. Relationship between preferred and maximum effort low back motion. Clin Biomech 1993;8:203-9.
25. Nachemson A. Work for all: For those with low back pain as well. Clin Orthop 1983;179:77-85.
26. Nachemson A. Recent advances in the treatment of low back pain. Int Orthop 1985;9:1-10.
27. Nachemson A, Lindh M. Measurement of abdominal and back muscle strength with and without low back pain. Scand J Rehabil Med 1969;1:60-5.
28. Newton M, Thow M, Sommerville D, Henderson I, Waddell G. Trunk strength testing with isomachines: Part 2. Experimental evaluation of the Cybex II back testing system in normal subjects and paitents with chronic low back pain. Spine 1993;18:812-24.
29. Nicolaisen T, Jorgansson K. Trunk strength, back muscle endurance and low back trouble. Scand J Rehabil Med 1985; 17:121-7.
30. Oxland T, Crisco J, Panjabi M, Yamamoto I. The effect of injury on rotational coupling at the lumbosacral joint: A biomechanical investigation. Spine 1992;17:74-80.
31. Panjabi M, Krag M, White A, Southwick W. Effects of preload on load displacement curves of the lumbar spine. Othop Clin North Am 1977;88:181-92.
32. Panjabi M, Yamamoto I, Oxland T, Crisco J. How does posture affect coupling in the lumbar spine? Spine 1989;14: 1002-11.
33. Parnianpour M, Nordin M, Kahanovitz N, Frankel V. The triaxial coupling of torque generation of trunk muscles during isometric exertions and the effect of fatiguing isoinertial movements on the motor output and movement patterns. Spine 1988;13:982-92.
34. Pearcy M, Portek J, Shepherd J. Three-dimensional x-ray analysis of normal movement in the lumbar spine. Spine 1984; 9:294-7.
35. Pearcy M, Portek I, Shepherd J. The effect of low-back pain on lumbar spinal movements measured by three-dimensional x-ray analysis. Spine 1985;10:150-3.
36. Peters J, Large RG, Elkind G. Follow-up results from a randomized controlled trial evaluating in- and outpatient pain management programmes. Pain 1992;50:41-50.
37. Snook S. Low back pain in industry. In: American Academy of Orthopaedic Surgeon Symposium on Idiopathic Low Back Pain. St. Louis: C.V. Mosby, 1982.
38. Tibrewal SB, Pearcy MJ, Portek I, Spivey J. A prospective study of lumbar spinal movements before and after discectomy using biplanar radiography: Correlation of clinical and radiographic findings. Spine 1996;10:455-60.
39. Troup JDG, Foreman TK, Baxter CE, Brown D. The perception of low back pain and the role of psychophysical tests of lifting capacity. Spine 1987;12:645-57.
40. White A, Panjabi M. Clinical Biomechanics of the Spine. 2nd ed. Philadelphia: J. B. Lippincott Company, 1990.