Biodiversity values for alternative management regimes in remote UK coniferous forests: An iterative bidding polychotomous choice approach

Environmentalist

Volumn 18, Issue 3, 1998, Pages 157-166

  Willis, K G ^a   Garrod, G D ^a  

^a NEWCASTLE UNIVERSITY   (United Kingdom)

Author keywords

[No Author keywords available]

Indexed keywords

BIODIVERSITY; CONIFEROUS FOREST; FOREST MANAGEMENT; FORESTRY POLICY;

UNITED KINGDOM;

EID: 0032422841     PISSN: 02511088     EISSN: None     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1023/A:1006698016933     Document Type: Article

References (14)

1. Arrow, Kenneth J., Robert Solow, P.R. Portney, E.E. Learner, R. Radner, and Schuman, H. (1993) Report of the National Oceanic and Atmospheric Administration Panel on Contingent Valuation. Federal Register, 58(10), 4610-4614, Washington DC.
2. Bateman, I.J., Willis, K.G., Garrod, G.D., Doktor, P., Langford, I.H. and Turner, R.K. (1992) Recreation and Environment Preservation in the Norfolk Broads: a contingent valuation study. Report to the National Rivers Authority. School of Environmental Science, University of East Anglia.
3. Bateman, I.J., Langford, I.H., Turner, R.K., Willis, K.G. and Garrod, G.D. (1995) Elicitation and truncation effects in contingent valuation studies. Ecological Economics 12, 161-179.
4. CSO (Central Statistical Office) (1995) Social Trends 1995 Edition. HMSO, London.
5. H.M. Government (1994) Sustainable Forestry: the UK Programme. Cm. 2429. HMSO, London.
6. Garrod, G.D. and Willis, K.G. (1996) Estimating the benefits of environmental enhancement: a case study of the River Darent. Journal of Environmental Planning and Management, 39(2), 189-203.
7. Hanemann, W.M., Loomis, J. and Kanninen, B. (1991) Statistical efficiency of double-bounded dichotomous choice contingent valuation. American Journal of Agricultural Economics, 73, 1255-1263.
8. Kennedy, C.E.J. and Southwood, T.R.E. (1984) The number of species of insect associated with British trees: a reanalysis. Journal of Animal Ecology, 53, 455-478.
9. Langford, I.H., Bateman, I.J. and Langford, H.D. (1994) Multilevel modelling and contingent valuation: part 1: a triple dounded dichotomous choice analysis. CSERGE Working Paper GEC 94-04. School of Environmental Sciences, University of East Anglia, Norwich
10. Mitchell, R.C. and Carson, R.T. (1989) Using Surveys to Value Public Goods. Resources for the Future, Washington D.C.
11. Randall, A., Ives, B. and Eastman, C. (1974) Bidding games for valuation of aesthetic environmental improvements. Journal of Environmental Economics and Management, 1, 132-149.
12. Ratcliffe, P.R. (1993) Biodiversity Britian's Forests. Forestry Commission, Edinburg.
13. Ready, R.C., Whitehead, J.C. and Blomquist, G.C. (1995) Contingent valuation when respondents are ambivalent. Journal of Environmental Economics and Management, 29, 181-196.
14. Schulze, W.D., d'Arge, R. and Brookshire, D.S. (1981) Valuing Environmental Commodities: some recent experiences. Land Economics, 57, 151-173.