Ancestral origins and genetic diversity of cultivated sunflower: Coancestry analysis of public germplasm

Crop Science

Volumn 38, Issue 6, 1998, Pages 1476-1482

  Chères, Mercy T ^a   Knapp, Steven J ^a  

^a OREGON STATE UNIVERSITY   (United States)

Author keywords

[No Author keywords available]

Indexed keywords

CLUSTER ANALYSIS; DNA FINGERPRINTING; GENETIC DIVERSITY; GERMPLASM; INBRED LINE; PRINCIPAL COMPONENT ANALYSIS; UNITED STATES;

HELIANTHUS ANNUUS;

EID: 0032419595     PISSN: 0011183X     EISSN: None     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.2135/cropsci1998.0011183X003800060012x     Document Type: Article

References (30)

1. Bernardo, R. 1993. Estimation of coefficient of coancestry using molecular markers in maize. Theor. Appl. Genet. 85:1055-1062.
2. Berry, S.T., R.J. Alien, S.R. Barnes, and P.D.S. Galigari. 1994. Molecular marker analysis of Helianthns anninis L. 1. Restriction fragment length polymorphism between inbred lines of cultivated sunflower. Theor. Appl. Genet. 89:435-441.
3. Brigham, R.D. 1988. Twenty years of sunflower (Helianthus animus ) releases in the USA. p. 398-403. In Proc. 12th Intl. Sunflower Conf. Novi-Sad, Yugoslavia.
4. Cox, T.S., Y.T. Kiang, M.B. Gorman, and D.M. Rodgers. 1985. Relationships between coefficient of parentage and genetic similarity indices in soybean. Crop Sci. 25:529-532.
5. Delanney, X., D.M. Rodgers, and R.G. Palmer. 1983. Relative genetic contributions among ancestral lines of North American soybean cultivars. Crop Sci. 23:944-949.
6. Felsentein, J. 1993. Documentation for PHYLIP (Phylogenetic Inference Package) Version 3.5C. Univ. of Washington, Seattle.
7. Pick, G.N., and D.E. Zimmer. 1974. Parental lines for production of confectionery sunflower hybrids. North Dakota Agric. Exp. Stn. Farm Res. 31:15-16.
8. Pick, G.N., and D.E. Zimmer. 1979. Registration of six nonoilseed sunflower parental lines. Crop Sci. 19:422.
9. Gentzbittel, L., Y -X. Zhang, F. Year, and B. Griveau. 1994. RFLP studies of genetic relationships among inbred lines of the cultivated sunflower, Heliantluis animus L.: Evidence for distinct restorer and maintainer germplasm pools. Theor. Appl. Genet. 89:419-425.
10. Gerdes, J.T., and W.F. Tracy. 1994. Diversity of historically important sweet corn inbreds estimated by RFLPs, morphology, isozymes, and pedigree. Crop Sci. 34:25-33.
11. Hongtrakul, V., G.M. Huestis, and S.J. Knapp. 1997. Amplified fragment length polymorphisms as a tool for DNA fingerprinting sunflower germplasm: genetic diversity among oilseed inbred lines. Theor Appl Genet 95:400-407.
12. Kempthorne, 0.1969. An introduction to genetic statistics. Iowa State Univ. Press, Ames.
13. Kinman, M.L. 1970. New developments in USDA and state experiment station breeding programs, p. 181-183. In Proc. 4th Sunflower Conf., Intl. Sunflower Assoc., Toowoomba, Australia.
14. Korell, M., G. Möosges, and W. Friedt. 1992. Construction of a sunflower pedigree map. Helia 15:7-16.
15. Leclercq, P. 1969. Une stérilité male cytoplasmique chez le Tournesol. Ann. Amélioration Plant 19:99-106.
16. Maciukenas, M., G. Olsen, N. Larsen, and C. Woese. 1991. TreetoolA phylogenetic data visualizer, editor, and tree formatter. Version 1.0, Ribosomal database project, Univ. Illnois, Champaign-Urbana.
17. Malccot, G. 1948. Les mathématiques de l'hérédité. Masson et Cie, Paris.
18. Melchinger, A.E., M.M. Messmer, M. Lee, W.L. Woodman, and K.R. Lamkey. 1991. Diversity and relationships among USA maize in-breds revealed by restriction fragment length polymorphisms. Crop Sci. 31:669-678.
19. Messmer, M.M., A.E. Melchinger, R.E. Hermann, and J. Boppen-maier. 1993. Relationships among European maize inbreds: II. Comparison of pedigree and RFLP data. Crop Sci. 33:944-950.
20. Mumm, R.H., and J.W. Dudley. 1994. A classification of 148 U.S. maize inbreds: Cluster analysis based on RFLPs. Crop Sci. 34: 842-851.
21. Roath, W.W., J.F. Miller, and T.J. Gulya. 1981. Registration of RHA801 sunflower germplasm. Crop Sci. 21:479.
22. SAS. 1985. SAS/IML user's guide. SAS Inst., Cary, N.C.
23. Skoric, D. 1993. Wild species use in sunflower breeding-results and future directions. FAO/IBPGR Plant Genet Res. Newsl. 93:17-23.
24. Smith, O.S., J.S.C. Smith, S.L. Bowen, R.A. Tenborg, and S.J. Wall. 1990. Similarities among a group of elite maize inbreds as measured by pedigree, F, heterosis, and RFLPs. Theor. Appl. Genet. 80: 833-840.
25. Smith, O.S., and J.S.C. Smith. 1992. Measurement of genetic diversity among maize hybrids, a comparison of isozyme, RFLP, pedigree, and heterosis data. Maydica 37:53-63.
26. Sneller, C.H. 1994. Pedigree analysis of elite soybean lines. Crop Sci. 34:1515-1522.
27. Souza, E., and M.E. Sorells. 1989. Pedigree analysis of north american oat cultivars released from 1951 to 1985. Crop Sci. 29:595-601.
28. Tersac, M., P. Blanchard, D. Brunei, and P. Vincourt. 1994. Relations between heterosis and enzymatic polymorphisms in populations of cultivated sunflowers (Helianthus animus L.). Theor. Appl. Genet. 88:49-55.
29. Tersac, M., D. Vares, and P. Vincourt. 1993. Combining-groups in cultivated sunflower populations (Helianthus animus L.) and their relationship with country of origin. Theor. Appl. Genet. 87: 603-608.
30. Vranceanu, V. 1985. Genetic resemblance of sunflower cultivars tested in international trials. Helia 8:9-16.