An epidemiologic investigation of unexpected refractive errors following cataract surgery

Canadian Journal of Ophthalmology

Volumn 33, Issue 4, 1998, Pages 210-215

  Courtright, Paul ^a   Paton, Katherine ^a   McCarthy, J Martin ^a   Sibley, Lyn M ^a   Holland, Simon P ^a  

^a UNIVERSITY OF BRITISH COLUMBIA   (Canada)

Author keywords

Cataract extraction; Intraocular lenses; Outcome assessment; Standards

Indexed keywords

POLY(METHYL METHACRYLATE);

ADULT; AGED; ARTICLE; CATARACT; CATARACT EXTRACTION; FEMALE; HEALTH CARE QUALITY; HUMAN; LENS IMPLANT; LENS POWER; MAJOR CLINICAL STUDY; MALE; POSTOPERATIVE COMPLICATION; REFRACTION ERROR;

EID: 0032418633     PISSN: 00084182     EISSN: 17153360     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: None     Document Type: Article

References (5)

1. Olsen T. Sources of error in intraocular lens power calculation. J Cataract Refract Surg 1992;18:125-8.
2. Grossman L, Igel D, Faaland B. Survey of the optical quality of intraocular lens implant. J Cataract Refract Surg 1991;17:168-74.
3. Norrby N, Grossman L, Geraghty E, Freiner C, Mihori M, Patel A, et al. Accuracy in determining intraocular lens dioptric power assessed by interlaboratory tests. J Cataract Refract Surg 1996;22:983-93.
4. Olsen T, Olesen H. IOL power mislabeling. Acta Ophthalmol (Copenh) 1993;71:99-102.
5. Guidelines for evaluation of intraocular lenses (IOL). Rev 3. Ottawa: Therapeutic Products Program, Medical Devices Bureau, Health Canada; 1996.