How groups co-ordinate their concepts and terminology: Implications for medical informatics

Methods of Information in Medicine

Volumn 37, Issue 4-5, 1998, Pages 471-476

  Garrod, S ^a  

^a UNIVERSITY OF GLASGOW   (United Kingdom)

Author keywords

Communication; Concepts; Medical Terminology

Indexed keywords

COGNITION; COMPREHENSION; CONTROLLED STUDY; HUMAN; INFORMATION SYSTEM; INTERPERSONAL COMMUNICATION; MEDICAL INFORMATION; NOMENCLATURE; PRIORITY JOURNAL; REVIEW;

EID: 0032418279     PISSN: 00261270     EISSN: None     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1055/s-0038-1634550     Document Type: Review

References (11)

1. Bruner JS, Goodnow J, Austin GA. A Study of Thinking. New York: Wiley 1956.
2. Biederman I. Recognition-by-components: a theory of human image understanding. Psychological Review 1987; 94:115-47.
3. Schank R. Conceptual dependency: a theory of natural language understanding. Cognitive Psychology 1972; 3:552-631.
4. Schyns PG, Goldstone RL, Thibaut JP. The development of features in object concepts. Behaviour and Brain Sciences (in press).
5. Murphy GL, Medin D. The role of theories in conceptual coherence. Psychological Review 1985; 92:289-316.
6. Glucksberg S, Danks JH. Experimental Psyclwlinguistics : an introduction. Hillsdale, NJ: Erlbaum 1975.
7. Andersen A, Garrod S. The dynamics of referential meaning in spontaneous dialogue: some preliminary studies. In: Reilly R, ed. Communication failure in dialogue and discourse. Amsterdam: Elsevier 1987; 161-83.
8. Garrod S, Anderson A. Saying what you mean in dialogue: a study in conceptual and semantic coordination. Cognition 1987; 27: 181-218.
9. Garrod S, Doherty G. Conversation, coordination and convention: an empirical investigation of how groups establish linguistic conventions. Cognition 1994; 53:181-215.
10. Levelt WJM. Speaking: From intention to articulation. Cambridge, MA: MIT Press.
11. Clark HH, Wilkes-Gibbs D. Referring as a collaborative process. Cognition 1986; 22: 1-39.