The influence of design on validity and efficiency of neighbour methods

Biometrics

Volumn 54, Issue 4, 1998, Pages 1374-1387

  Azais J M ^a   Monod, H ^b   Bailey, R A ^c  

^a INSTITUT DE MATHÉMATIQUES DE TOULOUSE   (France)

^b CEMAGREF   (France)

^c QUEEN MARY UNIVERSITY OF LONDON   (United Kingdom)

Author keywords

Efficiency; Neighbour methods; Neighhour balance; Randomization; Simulation study; Validity

Indexed keywords

DEGREES OF FREEDOM (MECHANICS); RANDOM PROCESSES;

FIELD EXPERIMENT; METHODS OF ANALYSIS; NEIGHBOR METHOD; NEIGHHOUR BALANCE; PRECISE DEFINITION; PROPERTY; RANDOMISATION; RANDOMIZED DESIGN; SIMULATION STUDIES; VALIDITY;

EFFICIENCY;

ARTICLE; BIOSTATISTICS; METHODOLOGY; RANDOMIZATION; SIMULATION; STATISTICAL ANALYSIS; STATISTICAL MODEL;

EID: 0032416470     PISSN: 0006341X     EISSN: None     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.2307/2533664     Document Type: Article

References (4)

1. Azaïs, J.-M., Denis, J.-B., Dhorne, T., and Kobilinksy, A. (1990). Neighbour analysis of plots experiments, a review of the different approaches. Biométrie Praximétrie 30, 15-39.
2. Azaïs, J.-M., Bailey, R. A., and Monod, H. (1993). A catalogue of efficient neighbour-designs with border plots. Biometrics 49, 1252-1261.
3. Bailey, R. A. (1991). Strata for randomized experiments. Journal of the Royal Statistical Society, Series B 53, 27-66.
4. Bailey, R. A. and Rowley, C. A. (1987). Valid randomization. Proceedings of the Royal Society of London, Series A 410, 105-124.