Increased otoacoustic-emission amplitude secondary to cochlear lesions

Journal of Otolaryngology

Volumn 27, Issue 6, 1998, Pages 354-360

  Raveh, Eyal ^a   Mount, Richard J ^a   Harrison, Robert V ^a  

^a HOSPITAL FOR SICK CHILDREN   (Canada)

Author keywords

Apical lesion; Audiology; Cochlea; Haircell damage; Hearing loss; Otoacoustic emissions

Indexed keywords

ANIMAL EXPERIMENT; ANIMAL MODEL; ARTICLE; CHINCHILLA; CONTROLLED STUDY; DISTORTION PRODUCT OTOACOUSTIC EMISSION; EVOKED OTOACOUSTIC EMISSION; HAIR CELL; HEARING LOSS; INNER EAR DISEASE; MENIERE DISEASE; NONHUMAN; OTOACOUSTIC EMISSION; PRIORITY JOURNAL; SCANNING ELECTRON MICROSCOPY;

ANIMALS; AUDITORY PERCEPTION; CHINCHILLA; COCHLEA; COCHLEAR DISEASES; COCHLEAR MICROPHONIC POTENTIALS; DISEASE MODELS, ANIMAL; EVOKED POTENTIALS, AUDITORY; HAIR CELLS, INNER; HAIR CELLS, OUTER; HEARING; HEARING LOSS, SUDDEN; MENIERE'S DISEASE; MICROSCOPY, ELECTRON, SCANNING; OTOACOUSTIC EMISSIONS, SPONTANEOUS; REACTION TIME;

EID: 0032416253     PISSN: 03816605     EISSN: None     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: None     Document Type: Article

References (27)

1. Kemp DT. Stimulated acoustic emissions from the human auditory system. J Acoust Soc Am 1978; 64:1386-1391.
2. Eldredge DH, Miller JD, Bohne BA. A frequency-position map for the chinchilla cochlea. J Acoust Soc Am 1981; 69:1091-1095.
3. Bohne B, Clark WW. Growth of hearing loss and cochlear lesion with increasing duration of noise exposure. In: Hamernik RP, Henderson D, Salvi R, eds. New perspectives on noise-induced hearing loss. New York: Raven Press, 1982: 283-302.
4. Clark WW, Bohne B. Cochlear damage: audiometric correlates? In: Collins MJ, Glatke TJ, Harker LA, eds. Sensorineural hearing loss: mechanism, diagnosis, and treatment. Iowa City, IA: University of Iowa Press, 1986:59-82.
5. Probst R, Lonsbury-Martin BL, Martin GK, et al. Otoacoustic emissions in ears with hearing loss. Am J Otolaryngol 1987; 8:73-81.
6. Suzuki M, Hunter-Duvar IM. Cochlear effects of cryosurgery. Scanning Electron Microsc 1982; 3:1295-1300.
7. Smith DW, Brown JN, Moody DB, et al. Cryoprobe-induced apical lesions in the chinchilla. II. Effect on behavioral auditory thresholds. Hear Res 1987; 26:311-317.
8. Probst R, Lonsbury-Martin BL, Martin GK. A review of otoacoustic emissions. J Acoust Soc Am 1991; 89:2027-2067.
9. Ohlms LA, Lonsbury-Martin BL, Martin GK. Acoustic-distortion product: separation of sensory from neural dysfunction in sensorineural hearing loss in human beings and rabbits. Otolaryngol Head Neck Surg 1991; 104:159-174.
10. Browning GG, Garnish MS. Surgical anatomy of the temporal bone in the chinchilla. Ann Ophthalmol Otol 1978; 87:875-882.
11. Malik LE, Wilson RB. Evaluation of modified technique for SEM examination of vertebrate specimens without evaporated metal layers. Scanning Electron Microsc 1975:259-264.
12. Kemp DT, Ryan S, Bray P. A guide to the effective use of otoacoustic emmisions. Ear Hear 1990; 11:93-105.
13. Brown JN, Nuttall AL. Cryoprobe-induced apical lesions in chinchilla. I. Morphological effects of lesioning parameters. Hear Res 1987; 26:301-309.
14. Wake M, Anderson J, Takeno S, et al. Otoacoustic emission amplification after inner hair cells damage. Acta Otolaryngol (Stockh) 1996; 116:371-381.
15. Kemp DT, Ryan S, Bray P. A guide to the effective use of otoacoustic emissions. Ear Hear 1990; 11:93-105.
16. Ohlms LA, Lonsbury-Martin BL, Martin GK. The clinical application of acoustic distortion product. Otolaryngol Head Neck Surg 1990; 102:315-322.
17. Avan P, Bonfils P, Loth D, et al. Quantitative assessment of human cochlear function by evoked otoacoustic emissions. Hear Res 1991; 52:99-112.
18. Sakashita T, Minowa Y, Hachikawa K, et al. Evoked otoacoustic emissions from ears with idiopathic sudden deafness. Acta Otolaryngol 1991; 486:66-72.
19. Lonsbury-Martin BL, McCoy MJ, Whitehead ML, Martin GK. Clinical testing of distortion-product otoacoustic emissions. Ear Hear 1993; 14:11-22.
20. Kakigi A, Hirakawa H, Mount RJ, et al. The effects of crossed olivocochlear bundle section on transient evoked otoacoustic emissions. Hear Res 1997; 110:34-38.
21. Siegel JH, Kim DO. Efferent neural control of cochlear mechanics? Olivo-cochlear bundle stimulation affects cochlear biomechanical nonlinearity. Hear Res 1982; 6:171-182.
22. Harel N, Kakigi A, Hirakawa H, et al. The effect of anaesthesia on otoacoustic emissions. Hear Res 1997; 110:25-33.
23. Kemp DT. Oto-acoustic emissions, traveling waves and cochlear mechanism. Hear Res 1986; 22:95-104.
24. 2 distortion product otoacoustic emissions in rabbits II, differential vulnerability. J Acoustic Soc Am 1993; 92:2662-2682.
25. Berlin CI, Hood LJ, Cecola P, et al. Does type I afferent neuron dysfunction reveal itself through lack of efferent suppression? Hear Res 1993; 65:40-50.
26. Berlin CI, Hood LJ, Hurley A, Wen H. Contralateral suppression of otoacoustic emissions: an index of the function of the medial olivo-cochlear system. Otolaryngol Head Neck Surg 1994; 110:3-21.
27. Kemp DT. Physiologically active cochlear micromechanics; a source of tinnitus. Tinnitus, CIBA Foundation Symposium No. 85. London: Pitmans Medical, 1981:54-81.