Assessing digital and quantitative EEG in clinical settings

Journal of Clinical Neurophysiology

Volumn 15, Issue 6, 1998, Pages 458-463

  Nuwer, Marc R ^a  

^a UNIVERSITY OF CALIFORNIA   (United States)

Author keywords

Clinical utility; Digital; EEG; Quantitative

Indexed keywords

ARTICLE; BIOMEDICAL TECHNOLOGY ASSESSMENT; CLINICAL PRACTICE; DIGITAL COMPUTER; ELECTROENCEPHALOGRAM; EPILEPSY; HUMAN; INTENSIVE CARE UNIT; MEDICAL LITERATURE; PATIENT MONITORING; PEER REVIEW; SEIZURE;

BRAIN; ELECTROENCEPHALOGRAPHY; HUMANS; MONITORING, PHYSIOLOGIC; SIGNAL PROCESSING, COMPUTER-ASSISTED;

EID: 0032412461     PISSN: 07360258     EISSN: None     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1097/00004691-199811000-00002     Document Type: Article

References (8)

1. American Psychiatric Association. Quantitative electroencephalography: a report on the present state of computerized EEG techniques. Am J Psychiatry 1991;148:961-64.
2. Longstreth WT, Jr., Koepsell TD, van Belle G. Clinical neuroepidemiology I. Diagnosis. Arch Neurol 1987a;44:1091-99.
3. Longstreth WT, Jr., Koepsell TD, van Belle G. Clinical neuroepidemiology II. Outcome. Arch Neurol 1987b;44:1196-1202.
4. Nuwer MR. On the controversies about clinical use of EEG brain mapping. Brain Topogr 1990;3:103-11.
5. Nuwer MR. Assessment of digital EEG, quantitataive EEG, and EEG brain mapping: report of the American Academy of Neurology and the American Clinical Neurophysiology Society. Neurology 1997;49:277-92.
6. Ransohoff DF, Feinstien AR. Problems of spectrum and bias in evaluating the efficacy of diagnostic tests. N Engl J Med 1978;299: 929-30.
7. Sox HC. Probability theory in the use of diagnostic tests. Ann Intern Med 1986;104:60-66.
8. Wasson JH, Sox HC, Neff RK, Goldman L. Clinical prediction rules: applications and methodological standards. N Engl J Med 1985; 313:793-99.