The relation between otoacoustic emissions and the broadening of the auditory filter for higher levels

Hearing Research

Volumn 126, Issue 1-2, 1998, Pages 1-10

  Leeuw, A Rens ^a   Dreschler, Wouter A ^a  

^a UNIVERSITY OF AMSTERDAM   (Netherlands)

Author keywords

Auditory filter; Normal hearing and hearing impaired subjects; Notched noise masking; Transient evoked otoacoustic emission

Indexed keywords

ADOLESCENT; ADULT; AGED; ARTICLE; AUDITORY MASKING; AUDITORY STIMULATION; AUDITORY THRESHOLD; CLICK; CLINICAL ARTICLE; CONTROLLED STUDY; EVOKED OTOACOUSTIC EMISSION; FILTER; HAIR CELL; HEARING IMPAIRMENT; HUMAN; NOISE; PRIORITY JOURNAL;

ACOUSTIC STIMULATION; ADOLESCENT; ADULT; AUDITORY THRESHOLD; CHILD; HEARING; HEARING LOSS, SENSORINEURAL; HUMANS; OTOACOUSTIC EMISSIONS, SPONTANEOUS; PERCEPTUAL MASKING; REFERENCE VALUES;

EID: 0032411047     PISSN: 03785955     EISSN: None     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1016/S0378-5955(98)00153-1     Document Type: Article

References (37)

1. Avan P., Bonfils P., Loth D., Narcy P., Trotoux J. Quantitative assessment of human cochlear function by evoked otoacoustic emissions. Hear. Res. 52:1991;99-112.
2. Bonfils P., Avan P., Francois M., Marie P., Trotoux J., Narcy P. Clinical significance of otoacoustic emissions: A perspective. Ear Hear. 11:1990;155-158.
3. Brownell W.E., Bader C.R., Bertrand D., de Ribaupierre Y. Evoked mechanical responses of isolated cochlear outer hair cells. Science. 227:1985;194-196.
4. Collet L., Veuillet E., Chanal J.M., Morgon A. Evoked otoacoustic emissions: Correlates between spectrum analysis and audiogram. Audiology. 30:1991;164-172.
5. Dubno J.R., Dirks D.D. Auditory filter characteristics and consonant recognition for hearing-impaired listeners. J. Acoust. Soc. Am. 85:1989;1666-1675.
6. Florentine M. Effects of cochlear impairment and equivalent-threshold masking on psychoacoustic tuning curves. Audiology. 31:1992;241-253.
7. Glasberg B.R., Moore B.C.J. Auditory filter shapes in subjects with unilateral and bilateral cochlear impairments. J. Acoust. Soc. Am. 79:1986;1020-1033.
8. Glasberg B.R., Moore B.C.J. Derivation of auditory filter shapes from notched-noise data. Hear. Res. 47:1990;103-138.
9. Glasberg B.R., Moore B.C.J., Patterson R.D., Nimmo-Smith I. Dynamic range and asymmetry of the auditory filter. J. Acoust. Soc. Am. 76:1984;419-427.
10. Hannley M., Dorman M.F. Susceptibility to intraspeech spread of masking in listeners with sensorineural hearing loss. J. Acoust. Soc. Am. 74:1983;40-51.
11. Harrison R.V., Evans E.F. Reverse correlation study of cochlear filtering in normal and pathological guinea pig ears. Hear. Res. 6:1982;303-314.
12. Hoth S. Relationship between parameters of evoked otoacoustic emissions and hearing loss. Audiol. Akust. 34:1995;20-29.
13. Kaernbach C. A single-interval adjustment-matrix (SIAM) procedure for unbiased adaptive testing. J. Acoust. Soc. Am. 88:1990;2645-2655.
14. Kanis L.J., de Boer E. Two-tone suppression in a locally active nonlinear model of the cochlea. J. Acoust. Soc. Am. 96:1994;2156-2165.
15. Kemp D.T. Stimulated acoustic emissions from within the human auditory system. J. Acoust. Soc. Am. 64:1978;1386-1391.
16. Kemp D.T. Otoacoustic emissions, travelling waves and cochlear mechanics. Hear. Res. 22:1986;95-104.
17. Leeuw A.R., Dreschler W.A. Frequency-resolution measurements with notched noises for clinical purposes. Ear Hear. 15:1994;240-255.
18. Lutman M.E., Gatehouse S., Worthington A.G. Frequency resolution as a function of hearing threshold and age. J. Acoust. Soc. Am. 89:1991;320-328.
19. Moore B.C.J., Glasberg B.R. Suggested formulae for calculating auditory-filter band-widths and excitation patterns. J. Acoust. Soc. Am. 74:1983;750-753.
20. Moore B.C.J., Glasberg B.R., Simpson A. Evaluation of a method of simulation reduced frequency selectivity. J. Acoust. Soc. Am. 91:1992;3402-3423.
21. Nedzelnitsky V. Sound pressures in the basal turn of the cat cochlea. J. Acoust. Soc. Am. 68:1980;1676-1689.
22. Neely S.T., Kim D.O. A model for active elements in cochlear biomechanics. J. Acoust. Soc. Am. 79:1986;1472-1480.
23. Patterson R.D., Nimmo-Smith I. Off-frequency listening and auditory-filter asymmetry. J. Acoust. Soc. Am. 67:1980;229-245.
24. Patterson R.D., Nimmo-Smith I., Weber D.L., Milroy R. The deterioration of hearing with age: Frequency selectivity, the critical ratio, the audiogram, and speech threshold. J. Acoust. Soc. Am. 72:1982;1788-1803.
25. Probst R., Lonsbury-Martin B.L., Martin G.K. A review of otoacoustic emissions. J. Acoust. Soc. Am. 89:1991;2027-2067.
26. Ritsma, R.J., Wit, H.P., van der Lans, W.P., 1980. Relations between hearing loss, maximal word discrimination score and width of psychophysical tuning curves. In: van den Brink, G. Bilsen, F. (Eds.) Psychophysical, Physiological and Behavioural Studies in Hearing, Delft University Press, Delft, pp. 175-182.
27. Rosen S., Baker R.J. Characterising auditory filter nonlinearity. Hear. Res. 73:1994;231-243.
28. Rosen S., Baker R.J. Acoustic reflexes in the measurement of auditory filters at high levels in normal listeners. Audiology. 33:1994;37-46.
29. Rosen S., Stock D. Auditory filter bandwidths as a function of level at low frequencies (125 Hz-1 kHz). J. Acoust. Soc. Am. 92:1992;773-781.
30. Smurzynski J., Jung M.D., Lafreniere D., Kim D.O., Kamath M.V., Rowe J.C., Holman M.C., Leonard G. Distortion-product and click-evoked otoacoustic emissions of preterm and full-term infants. Ear Hear. 14:1993;258-274.
31. Stelmachowicz P.G., Jesteadt W., Gorga M.P., Mott J. Speech perception ability and psychophysical tuning curves in hearing-impaired listeners. J. Acoust. Soc. Am. 77:1985;620-627.
32. Strube H.W. Evoked otoacoustic emissions as cochlear Bragg reflections. Hear. Res. 38:1989;35-45.
33. Van Summers W., Leek M.R. The role of spectral and temporal cues in vowel identification by listeners with impaired hearing. J. Speech Hear. Res. 35:1992;1189-1199.
34. Weber D.L. Growth of masking and the auditory filter. J. Acoust. Soc. Am. 62:1977;424-429.
35. Xu L., Probst R., Harris F.P., Roede J. Peripheral analysis of frequency in human ears revealed by tone burst evoked otoacoustic emissions. Hear. Res. 74:1994;173-180.
36. Zenner H.P., Zimmermann U., Schmitt U. Reversible contraction of isolated mammalian cochlear hair cells. Hear. Res. 18:1985;127-133.
37. Zwicker E. A hardware cochlear nonlinear preprocessing model with active feedback. J. Acoust. Soc. Am. 80:1986;146-153.