Patch testing with a standard series results from two clinics in cleveland, ohio usa, and comparison with a west european clinic in cologne, north rhine-westphalia germany

Dermatosen in Beruf und Umwelt

Volumn 46, Issue 6, 1998, Pages 234-243

  Dickel, Heinrich ^a,e   Taylor, James S ^b   Bickers, David R ^c   Rehse, Erwin ^d   Merk, Hans F ^a  

^a RWTH AACHEN UNIVERSITY   (Germany)

^b LERNER RESEARCH INSTITUTE   (United States)

^c Columbia University ^*  (United States)

^d UNIVERSITY OF COLOGNE   (Germany)

^e UNIVERSITY HOSPITAL RWTH AACHEN   (Germany)

Author keywords

Allergic contact dermatitis; Contact allergens; Epidemiology; Patch testing; Relative frequency; Standard series

Indexed keywords

ARTICLE; CONTACT DERMATITIS; DATA ANALYSIS; DIAGNOSTIC VALUE; GERMANY; HUMAN; MAJOR CLINICAL STUDY; PATCH TEST; SKIN DISEASE; UNITED STATES;

EID: 0032407123     PISSN: 03432432     EISSN: None     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: None     Document Type: Article

References (64)

1. Aberer, W., Reiter, E., Kontaktekzem und Epikutantest - Allergenverteilung und Wandel des Spektrums in Wien. Klin. Wochenschr. 103, 263-267 1991
2. Aberer, W, Reiter, E., Ziegler, V. et al, The Importance of Including Thiomersal, an Increasingly Frequent Allergen in Europe, in Standard Screening Series for Allergic Contact Dermatitis. Amer. J. Contact Derm. 2, 110-1121991
3. Adams, R. M., Maibach, H. I., Five-Year-Study of Cosmetic Reactions. J. Amer. Acad. Dermatol. 13, 1062-1069 1985
4. Andersen, K. E., Burrows, D., White, I. R., Allergens from the Standard Series, in: R. J. G. Rycroft, T. Menné, P. J. Frosch et al. eds., Textbook of Contact Dermatitis, 1st éd., pp. 415-456. Springer Verlag, Berlin-Heidelberg 1992
5. Becker, K., Temesvari, E., Nemeth, I., Patch Testing with Fragrance Mix and Its Constituents in a Hungarian Population. Contact Derm. 30, 185-186 1994
6. Bruckner-Tuderman, L., König, A., Schnyder, U. W, Patch Test Results of Dermatology Clinic Zurich in 1989: Personal Computer-Aided Statistical Evaluation. Dermatology 184, 29-99 1992
7. Carmichael, A. J., Foulds, I. S., Bransbury, D. S., Loss of Lanolin Patch-Test Positivity. Brit. J. Dermatol. 125,573-5761991
8. Code-Salazar, L., Del-Rio, E., Guimaraens, D. et al., Type IV Allergy to Rubber Additives: A 10-Year-Study of 686 cases. J. Amer. Acad. Dermatol. 29, 176-180 1993
9. De Groot, A. C, Test Concentrations and Vehicles for 2800 Allergens: Patch Testing, p. 295. Elsevier, Amsterdam 1986
10. De Groot, A. C, Van der Kley, A. M. J., Bruynzeel, D. P. et al, Frequency of False-Negative Reactions to the Fragrance Mix. Contact Derm. 28, 139-140 1993
11. Dickel, H., Rehse, E., Rasokat, H. et al., Allergiestatistik der Universitäts-Hautklinik Köln - Einführung der Kölner Allergologie-Datenbank DIMERA. Z. Hautkrankh. 68,443-449 1993
12. Eberhartinger, C, Beobachtung zur Häufigkeit von Kontaktallergien. Z. Hautkrankh. 59, 1283-1289 1984
13. Eiermann, H. l, Larsen, W. Maibach, H. F. et al., Prospective Study of Cosmetic Reactions: 1977-1980. J. Amer. Acad. Dermatol. 6, 909-917 1982
14. Enders, F., Przybilla, B., Ring, J. et al., Epikutantestung mit einer Standardreihe: Ergebnisse bei 12 026 Patienten. Hautarzt 39, 779-786 1988
15. Fischer, T., Maibach, H. I., Patch Testing in Allergie Contact Dermatitis: An Update. Semin. Dermatol. 5, 214-224 1986
16. Fischer, T., Maibach, H. I., Improved, but not Perfect, Patch Testing. Amer. J. Contact Derm. 1, 73-90 1990
17. Fischer, A. A., Contact Dermatitis, 3rd ed., p. 954. Lea & Febiger, Philadelphia 1986
18. Fowler, J. F. J., Allergic Contact Dermatitis to Metals. Amer. J. Contact Derm. 1, 212-223 1990
19. Fransway, A. F., The Problem of Preservation in the 1990s: I. Statement of the Problem, Solutions of the Industry, and the Current Use of Formaldehyde and Formaldehyde-Releasing Biocides. Amer. J. Contact Derm. 2, 6-23 1991
20. Fransway, A. F., The Problem of Preservation in the 1990s: III. Agents with Preservative Function Independent of Formaldehyde Release. Amer. J. Contact Derm. 2, 145-1741991
21. Fransway, A. F., Schmilz, N. A., The Problem of Preservation in the 1990s: II. Formaldehyde and Formaldehyde-Releasing Biocides: Incidences of Cross-Reactivity and the Significance of the Positive Response to Formaldehyde. Amer. J. Contact Derm. 2, 78-88 1991
22. Freeman, S., Fragrance and Nickel: Old Allergens in New Guises. Amer. J. Contact Derm. 1, 47-52 1990
23. Frosch, P. J., Aktuelle Kontaktallergene. Z. Hautkrankh. 62, 1631-1638 1987
24. Frosch, P. J. Deutsche Kontaktallergiegruppe, Aktuelle Kontaktallergene. Hautarzt 41, 129-133 1990
25. Gailhofer, G., Ludvan, M., Zur Änderung des Allergenspektrums bei Kontaktekzemen in den Jahren 19751984. Dermatosen 35, 12-15 1987
26. Hammershoy, O., Standard Patch Test Results in 3225 Consecutive Danish Patients from 1973 to 1977. Contact Derm. 6, 263-268 1980
27. Holness, D. L., Nethercott, J. R., Patch Testing in an Occupational Health Clinic. Amer. J. Contact Derm. 5, 150-1551994
28. Jarisch, R., Sandor, I., Epicutanstandardtestung: Ergebnisse aus fünf Jahren und ihre Auswirkung auf zukünftige Untersuchungen. Z. Hautkrankh. 53, 462-470 1978
29. Kuhlwein, A., Hausen, B. M., Standardepikutantestung: Statistische Auswertung aus fünf Jahren. Z. Hautkrankh. 57, 1179-1186 1982
30. Larsen, W., Perfume Dermatitis, in: A. A. Fisher, ed., pp. 394-404. Contact Dermatitis. 3rd ed., Lea & Febiger, Philadelphia 1986
31. Larsen, W., Nakayama, H., Lindberg, M. et al., Fragrance Contact Dermatitis: A Worldwide Multicenter Investigation Part I. Amer. J. Contact Derm. 7, 7783 1996
32. Lidén, C., Cold-Impregnated Aluminium: A New Source of Nickel Exposure. Contact Derm. 31, 22-24 1994
33. Lim, J. T. E., Goh, C. L., Ng, S. K. et al., Changing Trends in the Epidemiology of Contact Dermatitis in Singapore. Contact Derm. 26, 321-326 1992
34. Lynde, C. W., Mitchell, J. C., Patch Testing with Balsam of Peru and Fragrance Mix. Contact Derm. 8, 274-277 1982
35. MacFarlane, A. W., Curley, R. K., Graham, R. M. et al.. Delayed Patch Test Reactions at Days 7 and 9. Contact Derm. 20, 127-132 1989
36. Mangelsdorf, H. C, Fleischer, A. B., Sherertz, E. F., Patch Testing in an Aged Population without Dermatitis: High Prevalence of Patch Test Positivity. Amer. J. Contact Derm. 7, 155-157 1996
37. Marks, 1 G. 1, Belsito, D. V., DeLeo, V. A. et al, North American Contact Dermatitis Group Standard Tray Patch Test Results 1992 to 1994. Amer. J. Contact Derm. 6, 160-1651995
38. Marks, J. G. 1, DeLeo, V. A., Contact and Occupational Dermatology, p. 346. Mosby-Year Book, St. Louis 1992
39. Mathias, C. G. T, Maibach, H. I., When to Read the Patch Test? Int. J. Dermatol. 18, 127-129 1979
40. McDonagh, A. J. G, Wright, A. L., Cork, M. J. et al. Nickel Sensitivity: The Influence of Ear Piercing and Atopy. Brit. J. Dermatol. 126, 16-18 1992
41. Menné, T., Dooms-Goossens, A., Wahlberg, J. E. et al.. How Large a Proportion of Contact Sensitivities are Diagnosed with the European Standard Series? Contact Derm. 26, 201-202 1992
42. Mitchell, J. C., Day 7 D7 Patch Test Reading Valuable or Not? Contact Derm. 4, 139-141 1978
43. Nethercott, J. R., Holness, D. L., Adams, R. M. et al., Patch Testing with a Routine Screening Tray in North America, 1985 through 1989: II. Gender and Response. Amer. J. Contact Derm. 2, 130-134 1991
44. Nethercott, J. R., Holness, D. L., Adams, R. M. et al., Patch Testing with a Routine Screening Tray in North America, 1985 through 1989: III. Age and Response. Amer. J. Contact Derm. 2, 198-201 1991
45. Nethercott, J. R., Holness, D. L., Adams, R. M. et al., Patch Testing with a Routine Screening Tray in North America, 1985 through 1989: I. Frequency of Ré ponse. Amer. J. Contact Derm. 2, 122-129 1991
46. Nethercott, J. R., Holness, D. L., Adams, R. M. et al., Results of First and Second Readings with Standard Screening Tray in North America: 1985 to 1989. Amer. J. Contact Derm. 2, 255-259 1991
47. Nethercott, J. R., Holness, D. L., Adams, R. M. et al., Patch Testing with a Routine Screening Tray in North America, 1987 through 1989: IV. Occupation and Response. Amer. J. Contact Derm. 2, 247-254 1991
48. Nethercott, J. R., Holness, D. L., Adams, R. M. et al., Multivariate Analysis of the Effect of Selected Factors on the Elicitation of Patch Test Response to 28 Common Environmental Contactants in North America. Amer. J. Contact Derm. 5, 13-18 1994
49. Niklasson, B. J., Patch Test Concentrations: Appendix A, in: J. Guin ed., Practical Contact Dermatitis, pp. 705-769. McGraw Hill, New York 1995
50. Parker, L. U., Taylor, J. S., A 5-Year-Study of Contact Allergy to Quaternium-15. Amer. J. Contact Derm. 2,231-2341991
51. Perrenoud, D., Bircher, A., Hunziker, T. et al., Frequency of Sensitization to 13 Common Preservatives in Switzerland. Contact Derm. 30, 276-279 1994
52. Rammeisberg, R, Pevny, L, Metall-Allergien. Dermatosen34, 160-1621986
53. Rietschel, R. L., Adams, R. M., Maibach, H. I. et al., The Case for Patch Test Readings Beyond Day 2: Notes from the Lost and Found Department. J. Amer. Acad. Dermatol. 18, 42-45 1988
54. Rietschel, R. L., Fowler, J. F. J., Fisher's Contact Dermatitis, p. 1117. Williams & Wilkins, Baltimore-Philadelphia etc. 1995
55. Rycroft, R. J. G., Is Patch Testing Necessary? In: R. H. Champion, R. J. Pye eds., Recent Advances in Dermatology, Vol. 8, pp. 101-111. Churchill Livingstone, Edinburgh 1990
56. Scheinman. P. L., Allergic Contact Dermatitis to Fragrance: A Review. Amer. J. Contact Derm. 7, 65761996
57. Schnuch, A., Uter, W., Lehmacher, W. et al., Epikutantestung mit der Standardserie: Erste Ergebnisse des Projektes Informationsverbund Dermatologischer Kliniken" IVDK. Dermatosen 41, 60-70 1993
58. Shuster. S.. Risk of Sensitization of Kathon CG, Letter to the editor. Contact Derm. 19, 211-214 1988
59. Storrs, F. J., Rosenthal, L. E., Adams, R. M. et al.. Prevalence of Allergie Reactions in Patients Patch Tested in North America - 1984 to 1985. J. Amer. Acad. Dermatol. 20, 1038-1045 1989
60. Taylor, J. S., Adhesives, Gums and Resins, in: A. A. Fisher ed.. Contact Dermatitis, 3rd éd.. pp. 644-674. Lea & Febiger, Philadelphia 1986
61. Wang, X. M., Lin, Y. F.. Cheng, X. F. et al.. Patch Testing with the European Standard Series in Shanghai. Contact Derm. 30, 173-174 1994
62. Wantke, F., Demmer, C. M., Götz, M. et al, Contact Dermatitis from Thiomersal: 2 Years' Experience with Ethylmercuric Chloride in Patch Testing Thiomersal-Sensitive Patients. Contact Derm. 30, 115-117 1994
63. Wilkinson, J. D., Hambly, E. M., Wilkinson, D. S., Comparison of Patch Test Results in Two Adjacent Areas of England. II. Medicaments. Acta Derm. Venereol. Stockh. 60, 245-249 1980
64. Young, E., Van Weelden, H., Van Osch, L., Age and Sex Distribution of the Incidence of Contact Sensitivity to Standard Allergens. Contact Derm. 19, 307-308 1988