The regulator's review of the English Electricity Pool

Utilities Policy

Volumn 7, Issue 3, 1998, Pages 129-141

  Newbery, David M ^a  

^a Department of Applied Economics ^*  (United Kingdom)

Author keywords

English Electricity Pool; Reform; Trading arrangements

Indexed keywords

ELECTRICITY INDUSTRY; ENERGY MARKET; INDUSTRIAL REGULATION;

ENGLAND; UNITED KINGDOM;

EID: 0032406366     PISSN: 09571787     EISSN: None     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1016/S0957-1787(98)00011-3     Document Type: Article

References (22)

1. Barker, J., Tenenbaum, B., Woolf, F., 1997. Governance and regulation of power pools and systems operators: an international comparison. World Bank Technical Paper 382. Washington, DC.
2. DTI, 1998a. A fair deal for consumers: modernising the framework for utility regulation. Department of Trade and Industry, CM 3898, HMSO, London.
3. DTI, 1998b. Review of energy sources for power generation: consultation document. Department of Trade and Industry, London.
4. Electricity Pool, 1998. Pool Review Steering Group response to Offer's Interim Conclusions of June 1998. Electricity Pool, London.
5. Green, R.J., McDaniel, T., 1998. Competition in electricity supply: will 1998 be worth it? Fiscal Studies 19 (3), 273-293.
6. HC, 1992. Consequences of electricity privatisation. Energy Committee, House of Commons, 1113-1, HMSO, London.
7. HC, 1998. The Coal Report. Trade and Industry Committee, House of Commons, HMSO, London.
8. Henney, A., Bidwell, M., 1997. Reforming the Pool of England and Wales - a report for Mr John Battle, Minister for Energy, Science and Industry and Pool Members. EEE Ltd, London.
9. Newbery, D.M., 1997. Pool reform and competition in electricity. DAE Working Paper 9734, Cambridge, in M. Beesley (ed.) Regulating Utilities: understanding the issues, 1998, Institute of Economic Affairs, London.
10. Newbery, D.M., Pollitt, M.G., 1997. The restructuring and privatisation of the CEGB - was it worth it? Journal of Industrial Economics 45 (3), 269-303.
11. Offer, 1992a. Report on Constrained-on Plant, October 1992. Office of Electricity Regulation, Birmingham.
12. Offer, 1992b. Review of Pool Prices, December 1992. Office of Electricity Regulation, Birmingham.
13. Offer, 1992c. Review of Economic Purchasing, December 1992. Office of Electricity Regulation, Birmingham.
14. Offer, 1994a. Decision on a Monopolies and Mergers Commission Reference, February, 1994. Office of Electricity Regulation, Birmingham.
15. Offer, 1994b. Trading outside the Pool, 14 July. Office of Electricity Regulation, Birmingham.
16. Offer, 1998a. Review of Electricity Trading Arrangements: Background paper 1 - Electricity Trading Arrangements in England and Wales, February. Office of Electricity Regulation, Birmingham.
17. Offer, 1998b. Review of Electricity Trading Arrangements: Background Paper 2 - Electricity Trading Arrangements in other Countries, February. Office of Electricity Regulation, Birmingham.
18. Offer, 1998c Review of Electricity Trading Arrangements: Working Paper on Trading Inside and Outside the Pool, March. Office of Electricity Regulation, Birmingham.
19. Offer, 1998d. Review of Electricity Trading Arrangements - Interim Conclusions, June. Office of Electricity Regulation, Birmingham.
20. Offer, 1998e. Review of Electricity Trading Arrangements, July. Office of Electricity Regulation, Birmingham.
21. Offer, 1998f Report on Pool Price Increases in Winter 1997/98, June. Office of Electricity Regulation, Birmingham.
22. Stoft, S., 1997. What should a power market want. Electricity Journal 10 (5), 34-45.