Biomass accumulation and radiation use efficiency of honey mesquite and eastern red cedar

Biomass and Bioenergy

Volumn 15, Issue 6, 1998, Pages 467-473

  Kiniry, J R ^a  

^a AGRICULTURAL RESEARCH SERVICE   (United States)

Author keywords

Beer's law; Leaf area index; Light interception

Indexed keywords

BIOMASS ACCUMULATION; GROWTH REGULATION; JUNIPERUS VIRGINIANA; LEAF AREA INDEX; PHOTOSYNTHESIS; PLANT GROWTH; PROSOPIS GLANDULOSA; RADIATION USE EFFICIENCY; RADIATION; SIMULATION; SOIL EROSION;

COMPUTER SIMULATION; ENERGY EFFICIENCY; ENERGY MANAGEMENT; GROWTH KINETICS; MATHEMATICAL MODELS; PLANTS (BOTANY); RADIATION;

BEER LAW; BIOMASS ACCUMULATION; EASTERN RED CEDAR; HONEY MESQUITE; LEAF AREA INDEX; RADIATION USE EFFICIENCY;

BIOMASS;

EID: 0032403509     PISSN: 09619534     EISSN: None     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1016/S0961-9534(98)00057-9     Document Type: Article

References (36)

1. Kiniry J.R., Major D.J., Izaurralde C., Gassman P., Morrison M., Williams J.R., Bergentine R., Zentner R.P. EPIC model parameters for crops and forages in the northern Great Plains of the U.S.and the prairie provinces of Canada. Can. J. Crop Sci. 75:1995;679-688.
2. Kiniry J.R., Sanderson M.A., Williams J.R., Tischler C.R., Hussey M.A., Ocumpaugh W.R., Read J.C. Van, Esbroeck G., Reed R.L. Simulating Alamo' switchgrass with the ALMANAC model. Agron. J. 88:1996;602-606.
3. McMurtrie R.E., Gholz H.L., Linder S., Gower S.T. Climatic factors controlling the productivity of pine stands: a model-based analysis. Ecological Bulletins. 43:1994;173-188.
4. Landsberg J.J., Waring R.H. A generalised model of forest productivity using simplified concepts of radiation-use efficiency, carbon balance and partitioning. Forest Ecology and Management. 95:1997;209-228.
5. Monsi M., Saeki T. Über den lichtfaktor in den pflanzengesellschaften und seine bedeutung für die stoffproduktion. Japan. J. Bot. 14:1953;22-52.
6. Monteith J.L. Climate and the efficiency of crop production in Britain. Phil. Trans. R. Soc. Ser. B. 281:1977;277-294.
7. Anderson M.C. The geometry of leaf distribution in some southeastern Australian forests. Agric. Met. 25:1981;195-205.
8. Jackson J.E. Light interception and utilization by orchard systems. Hort. Review. 2:1980;208-267.
9. Tadaki, Y., Forest Biomass. Chapter 3. In Productivity of Terrestrial Communities, 16, ed. T. Shidei and T. Kira. JIBP Synth. Tokyo, 1977, pp. 39-44.
10. Jarvis, P.G. and Leverenz, J.W., Productivity of temperate, deciduous and evergreen forests. In Physiological Plant Ecology IV. Ecosystem Processes: Mineral Cycling, Productivity and Man's Influence, ed. O.L. Lange, P.S. Nobel, C.B. Osmond and H. Ziegler. Springer-Verlag, Berlin, Heidelberg, New York, 1983, pp. 234-280.
11. Bolstad P.V., Gower S.T. Estimation of leaf area index in fourteen southern Wisconsin forest stands using a portable radiometer. Tree Physiology. 7:1990;115-124.
12. Isebrands J.G., Nelson N.D. Crown architecture of short-rotation, intensively cultured Populus II. branch morphology and distribution of leaves within the crown of Populus Tristis' as related to biomass production. Can. J. For. Res. 12:1982;853-864.
13. Zavitkovski, J., Projected and actual biomass production of 2- to 10-year-old intensively cultured Populus Tristis 1 Gen. Tech. Rep. NC-91. St. Paul, MN: USDA For. Serv., North Central For. Exp. Sta., 1983, 72-76.
14. Landsberg J.J., Wright L.L. Comparisons among Populus clones and intensive culture conditions, using an energy-conversion model. Forest Ecology and Management. 27:1989;129-147.
15. Heilman P.E., Xie Fu-Guang. Effects of nitrogen fertilization on leaf area, light interception, and productivity of short-rotation Populus trichocarpa X Populus deltoides hybrids. Can. J. For. Res. 24:1994;166-173.
16. Gholz H.L., Vogel S.A., Cropper W.P. Jr, McKelvey K., Ewel K.C. Dynamics of canopy structure and light interception in Pinus elliottii stands, north Florida. Ecol. Mono. 61:1991;33-51.
17. Jack S.B., Long J.N. Structure, production and leaf area dynamics: a comparison of lodgepole pine and sunflower. Ann. Bot. 68:1991;247-252.
18. Ford E.D. High productivity in a polestage Sitka spruce stand and its relation to canopy tructure. Forestry. 55:1982;1-17.
19. Wang Y.P., Jarvis P.G., Taylor C.M.A. PAR absorption and its relation to above-ground dry matter production of Sitka spruce. J. Appl. Ecol. 28:1991;547-560.
20. Linder, S., Potential and actual production in Australian forest stands. In Research for Forest Management, ed. J. J. Landsberg and W. Parsons. CSIRO. Commonwealth Scientific and Industrial Res. Org. Melbourne Australia, 1985, pp. 11-35.
21. Harrington R.A., Fownes J.H. Radiation interception and growth of planted and coppice stands of four fast-growing tropical trees. J. Applied Ecology. 32:1995;1-8.
22. Cannell M.G.R., Sheppard L.J., Milne R. Light use efficiency and woody biomass production of poplar and willow. Forestry. 61:1988;125-136.
23. Johnson R.S., Lakso A.N. Approaches to modeling light interception in orchards. Hortscience. 26:1991;1002-1004.
24. Kiniry J.R., Jones C.A., O'Toole J.C., Blanchet R., Cabelguenne M., Spanel D.A. Radiation use efficiency in biomass accumulation prior to grain filling for five grain-crop species. Field Crops Res. 20:1989;51-64.
25. Pothier D., Margolis A. Analysis of growth and light interception of balsam fir and white birch saplings following precommercial thinning. Ann. Sci. For. 48:1991;123-132.
26. Farmer, D.B. Using climatic and soils information to project loblolly pine growth. M.S. Thesis. Texas A&M Univ. p. 77, 1988.
27. Yunusa I.A.M., Mead D.J., Lucas R.J., Pollock K.M. Process studies in a Pinus radiata-pasture agroforestry system in a subhumid temperature environment. II. Analysis of dry matter yields in the third year. Agroforestry Systems. 32:1995;185-204.
28. Landsberg J.J., Hingston F.J. Evaluating a simple radiation/dry matter conversion model using data from Eucalyptus globulus plantations in Western Australia. Tree Physiology. 16:1996;801-808.
29. Ludwig J.A., Reynolds J.F., Whitson P.D. Size-biomass relationships of several Chihuahuan desert shrubs. American Midl. Naturalist. 94:1975;451-461.
30. Brown J.K. Estimating shrub biomass from basal stem diameters. Can. J. Forest Res. 6:1976;153-158.
31. Whisenant S.G., Burzlaff D.F. Predicting green weight of mesquite (Prosopis glandulosa Torr.). J. Range Management. 31:1978;396-397.
32. Murray R.B., Jacobson M.Q. An evaluation of dimension analysis for predicting shrub biomass. J. Range Management. 35:1982;451-454.
33. Ganskopp D., Miller R. Estimating leaf area of big sagebrush from measurement of sapwood. J. Range Management. 39:1986;338-340.
34. MacDonald G.B., Forslund R.R. Application of a geometrical volume equation to species with different bole forms. Can. J. For. Res. 16:1986;311-314.
35. Messier C. Factors limiting early growth of western red cedar, western hemlock and Sitka spruce seedlings on ericaceous-dominated clearcut sites in coastal British Columbia. Forest Ecol. and Management. 60:1993;181-206.
36. Grier C.C., Running S.W. Leaf area of mature northwestern coniferous forests: relation to site water balance. Ecology. 58:1977;893-899.