Differential Effects of Question Formats in Math Assessment on Metacognition and Affect

Applied Measurement in Education

Volumn 11, Issue 4, 1998, Pages 331-351

  O'Neil Jr , Harold F ^a   Brown, Richard S ^b  

^a UNIVERSITY OF SOUTHERN CALIFORNIA   (United States)

^b UNIVERSITY OF CALIFORNIA   (United States)

Author keywords

[No Author keywords available]

Indexed keywords

EID: 0032397222     PISSN: 08957347     EISSN: None     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1207/s15324818ame1104_3     Document Type: Article

References (48)

1. Baker, E. L., & O'Neil, H. F., Jr. (1994). Performance assessment and equity: A view from the USA. Assessment in Education, 1, 11-26.
2. Baker, E. L., & O'Neil, H. F., Jr. (1995). Diversity, assessment, and equity in educational reform. In M. Nettles & A. Nettles (Eds.), Equity and excellence in educational testing and assessment (pp. 69-87). Boston: Kluwer.
3. Baker, E. L., O'Neil, H. F., Jr., & Linn, R. L. (1993). Policy and validity prospects for performance-based assessment. American Psychologist, 48, 1210-1218.
4. Baxter, G. P., & Shavelson, R. J. (1994). Science performance assessments: Benchmarks and surrogates. International Journal of Educational Research, 21, 279-297.
5. Bolger, N., & Kellaghan, T. (1990). Method of measurement and gender differences in scholastic achievement. Journal of Educational Measurement, 27, 165-174.
6. Borkowski, J. G., & Muthukrishna, N. (1992). Moving metacognition into the classroom: "Working models" and effective strategy teaching. In M. Pressley, K. R. Harris, & J. T. Guthrie (Eds.), Promoting academic competence and literacy in school (pp. 477-501). San Diego, CA: Academic.
7. Borkowski, J. G., & Thorpe, P. K. (1994). Self-regulation and motivation: A life-span perspective on underachievement. In D. H. Schunk & B. J. Zimmerman (Eds.), Self-regulation of learning and performance (pp. 45-73). Hillsdale, NJ: Lawrence Erlbaum Associates, Inc.
8. Breland, H., Danos, D., Kahn, H., Kubota, M., & Sudlow, M. (1991). A study of gender and performance on Advanced Placement history examinations (College Board Rep. No. 91-4; ETS RR No. 91-61). New York: College Entrance Examination Board.
9. Breland, H., & Griswold, P. (1981). Group comparisons for basic skills measures (College Board Rep. No. 81-6; ETS RR No. 81-21). New York: College Entrance Examination Board.
10. Breland, H., & Griswold, P. (1982). Use of a performance test as a criterion in a differential validity study. Journal of Educational Psychology, 74, 713-721.
11. Bridgeman, B. (1989). Comparative validity of multiple-choice and free-response items on the Advanced Placement examination in biology (College Board Rep. No. 89-2; ETS RR No. 89-1). New York: College Entrance Examination Board.
12. Burstein, L. (1980). Analysis of multilevel data in educational research and evaluation. In D. Berliner (Ed.), Review of research in education (Vol. 8, pp. 158-233). Washington, DC: American Educational Research Association.
13. California State Department of Education. (1993a). High school performance assessment. Sacramento, CA: CTB Macmillan/McGraw-Hill.
14. California State Department of Education. (1993b). Statewide performances: Standards for the California Learning Assessment System (CLAS) (A supplement to Students, standards, and success). Sacramento, CA: Author.
15. Cronbach, L. J., Bradburn, N. M., & Horvitz, D. G. (1994, July). Sampling and statistical procedures used in the California Learning Assessment System (Report of the Select Committee). Sacramento, CA: California State Department of Education.
16. Everson, H. T., Smodlaka, I., & Tobias, S. (1994). Exploring the relationship of test anxiety and metacognition on reading test performance: A cognitive analysis. Anxiety, Stress, and Coping, 7, 85-96.
17. Gao, X., Shavelson, R. J., & Baxter, G. P. (1994). Generalizability of large-scale performance assessments in science: Promises and problems. Applied Measurement in Education, 7, 323-342.
18. Garcia, T., & Pintrich, P. R. (1994). Regulating motivation and cognition in the classroom: The role of self-schemas and self-regulatory strategies. In D. H. Schunk & B. J. Zimmerman (Eds.), Self-regulation of learning and performance (pp. 127-153). Hillsdale, NJ: Lawrence Erlbaum Associates, Inc.
19. Hembree, R. (1988). Correlates, causes, effects, and treatment of test anxiety. Review of Educational Research, 58, 47-77.
20. Hembree, R. (1990). The nature, effects and relief of mathematics anxiety. Journal for Research in Mathematics Education 21, 33-46.
21. Herman, J. L., Aschbacher, P. R., & Winters, L. (1992). A practical guide to alternative assessment. Alexandria, VA: Association for Supervision and Curriculum Development.
22. Herman, J. L., Klein, D. C., Heath, T. M., & Wakai, S. T. (1994). A first look: Are claims for alternative assessment holding up? (CSE Tech. Rep. No. 391). Los Angeles: University of California, Center for Research on Evaluation, Standards, and Student Testing.
23. Kirk, R. (1982). Experimental design. Belmont, CA: Wadsworth.
24. Linn, R., Baker, E. L., & Dunbar, S. (1991). Complex, performance-based assessment: Expectations and validation criteria. Educational Researcher, 20(8), 15-21.
25. Mazzeo, J., Schmitt, A., & Bleistein, C. (1992). Sex-related differences on constructed-response and multiple-choice sections of advanced placement examinations: Three exploratory studies. Princeton, NJ: Educational Testing Service.
26. Miller, M. D., & Legg, S. M. (1993). Alternative assessment in a high-stakes environment. Educational Measurement: Issues and Practice, 12(2), 9-15.
27. Miller-Jones, D. (1989). Culture and testing. American Psychologist, 44, 360-366.
28. Muthén, B. O. (1987). LISCOMP. Analysis of linear structural equations with a comprehensive measurement model. Mooresville, IN: Scientific Software.
29. Ogbu, J. (1978). Minority education and caste. San Diego, CA: Academic.
30. Ogbu, J. (1992). Understanding cultural diversity and learning. Educational Researcher, 21(8), 5-14.
31. O'Neil, H. F., Jr., & Abedi, J. (1996). Reliability and validity of a state metacognitive inventory. Potential for alternative assessment. Journal of Educational Research, 89, 234-245.
32. O'Neil, H. F., Jr., Sugrue, B., Abedi, J., Baker, E. L., & Golan, S. (1997). Final report of experimental studies on motivation and NAEP test performance (CSE Tech. Rep. No. 427). Los Angeles: University of California, National Center for Research on Evaluation, Standards, and Student Testing.
33. O'Neil, H. F., Jr., Sugrue, B., & Baker, E. L. (1996). Effects of motivational interventions on the National Assessment of Educational Progress mathematics performance. Educational Assessment, 3, 135-157.
34. Paris, S. G., Cross, D. R., & Lipson, M. Y. (1984). Informed strategies for learning: A program to improve children's reading awareness and comprehension. Journal of Educational Psychology, 76, 1239-1252.
35. Peterson, N., & Livingston, S. (1982). English composition tests with essay: A descriptive study of the relationship between essay and objective scores by ethnic group and sex (ETS Rep. No. SR-82-96). Princeton, NJ: Educational Testing Service.
36. Pintrich, P. R., & DeGroot, E. V. (1990). Motivational and self-regulated learning components of classroom academic performance. Journal of Educational Psychology, 82, 33-40.
37. Pressley, M., & Afflerbach, P. (1995). What readers can do when they read: A summary of the results from the on-line self-report studies of reading. In M. Pressley & P. Afflerbach (Eds), Verbal protocols of reading: The nature of constructively responsive reading (pp. 31-82). Hillsdale, NJ: Lawrence Erlbaum Associates, Inc.
38. Seltzer, M. H. (1994). Studying variation in program success: A multilevel modeling approach. Evaluation Review, 18, 342-361.
39. Spielberger, C. D. (1975). Anxiety: State-trait process. In C. D. Spielberger & I. G. Sarason (Eds.), Stress and anxiety (Vol. 1, pp. 115-143). Washington, DC: Hemisphere.
40. Steinberg, L., Dornbusch, S. M., & Brown, B. B. (1992). Ethnic differences in adolescent achievement: An ecological perspective. American Psychologist, 47, 723-729.
41. Tobias, S., & Everson, H. (1995, April). Development and validation of an objective measure of metacognition. In W. E. Montague (Chair), Issues in metacognitive research and assessment. Symposium conducted at the annual meeting of the American Educational Research Association, San Francisco.
42. Weinstein, C. E., & Meyer, D. K. (1991). Cognitive learning strategies and college teaching. College Teaching: From Theory to Practice, 34, 15-26.
43. Winfield, L. E., & Woodard, M. D. (1994). Assessment, equity and diversity in reforming America's schools. Educational Policy, 8(1), 3-27.
44. Yap, E. G. (1993). A structural model of self-regulated learning in math achievement. Unpublished doctoral dissertation. University of Southern California, Los Angeles.
45. Zimmerman, B. J. (1989). Models of self-regulated learning and academic achievement. In B. J. Zimmerman & D. H. Schunk (Eds), Self-regulated learning and academic achievement: Theory, research, and practice (pp. 1-25). New York: Springer-Verlag.
46. Zimmerman, B. J., & Martinez-Pons, M. (1986). Development of a structured interview for assessing student use of self-regulated learning strategies. American Educational Research Journal, 23, 614-628.
47. Zimmerman, B. J., & Martinez-Pons, M. (1988). Construct validation of a strategy model of student self-regulated learning. Journal of Educational Psychology, 80, 284-290.
48. Zimmerman, B. J., & Martinez-Pons, M. (1990). Student differences in self-regulated learning: Relating grade, sex, and giftedness to self-efficacy and strategy use. Journal of Educational Psychology, 82, 51-59.