Relationships between genetic distance and dominance and epistatic effects in line-crosses of mice

Journal of Animal Breeding and Genetics

Volumn 115, Issue 4, 1998, Pages 313-321

  Mohamed, S A ^a   Pirchner, F ^a  

^a TECHNICAL UNIVERSITY OF MUNICH   (Germany)

Author keywords

[No Author keywords available]

Indexed keywords

EID: 0032393666     PISSN: 09312668     EISSN: None     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1111/j.1439-0388.1998.tb00352.x     Document Type: Article

References (20)

1. AUMANN, J., 1986: Modellversuch mit Mäusen zur Schätzung von Kreuzungswirkungen unter Berücksichtigung der Epistasie. Dissertation, TU München.
2. CAVALLI-SFORZA, L. L.; EDWARDS, A. W. F., 1967: Phylogenetic analysis models and estimation procedures. Evolution 21: 550-570.
3. 1 crosses as measured by genetic markers. Anim. Genet. 26: 135-140.
4. DOBZHANSKY, T., 1948: Genetics of natural populations. XVIII. Experiments on chromosomes of Drosophila pseudoobscura from different geographic regions. Genetics 35: 588-602.
5. FELSENSTEIN, J., 1993: PHYLIP (Phylogeny Inference Package) Version 3.5 p Washington University.
6. GARNETT, I.; FALCONER, D. S., 1975: Protein variation in strains of mice differing in body size. Genet. Res. 25: 45-57.
7. GODDARD, M. E.; AHMED, A. M., 1982: The use of genetic distances between cattle breeds to predict heterosis in crosses. In 2 WCGALP (World Congress of Genetics Applied to Livestock Production), Madrid, p. 377-382.
8. GRAML, R.; PIRCHNER, F., 1984: Relation of genetic distance between cattle breeds and heterosis of resulting crosses. Anim. Genet. 15: 173-180.
9. HILL, W. G., 1982: Dominance and epistasis as components of heterosis. Z. Tierz. Züchtungsbiol. 99: 161-168.
10. HOHENBRINK, R.; DINKLAGE, H.; GUHN, R., 1972: Degree of heterozygosity in purebred and crossbred pigs as related to breeding performance characteristics. In: XII Eur. Conf. Animal Bldg. Biochem. Genet., Budapest, p. 343-346.
11. KEIGHTLEY, P. D.; BULFIELD, G., 1993: Detection of quantitative trait loci from frequency changes of marker alleles under selection. Genet. Res. 62: 195-203.
12. LYNCH, M., 1991: The interaction of inbreeding depression and outbreeding depression. Evolution 45: 622-629.
13. MOLL, R. H.; LONNQUIST, J. H.; FORTUNO, J. V.; JOHNSON, E. C., 1965: The relationship of heterosis and genetic divergence in maize. Genetics 52: 139-144.
14. NEI, M., 1972: Genetic distance between populations. Am. Nat. 106: 283-292.
15. PIRCHNER, F., 1983: Population Genetics in Animal Breeding. 2nd edn. Plenum Press, New York and London.
16. RICE, M.; O'BRIEN, S. J., 1980: Genetic variance of laboratory outbred Swiss mice. Nature 283: 157-161.
17. SHERIDAN, A. K., 1981: Crossbreeding and heterosis. Anim. Breed. Abstr. 49: 131-144.
18. SAS, 1988: SAS/STAT User's Guide (Release 6.03) SAS Inst. Inc., Cary, NC.
19. VON BUTLER, I., 1981: Vergleich der Effizienz verschiedener Methoden bei Selektion auf antagonistische Eigenschuften bei der Hausmaus. Dissertation, TU München.
20. WOLF, J., 1994: User's manual for the software package CBE, Version 2.0 (A universal program for estimating crossbreeding effects). Res. Inst. Anim. Prod. Prag, Czech Republic.