From method to critique: A reply to Vonk and van Vliet

European Journal of Social Psychology

Volumn 28, Issue 4, 1998, Pages 669-673

  Wagner, Wolfgang ^a  

^a JOHANNES KEPLER UNIVERSITY LINZ   (Austria)

Author keywords

[No Author keywords available]

Indexed keywords

EID: 0032393271     PISSN: 00462772     EISSN: None     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1002/(SICI)1099-0992(199807/08)28:4<669::AID-EJSP921>3.0.CO;2-D     Document Type: Review

References (8)

1. Amir, Y., & Sharon, I. (1987). Are social psychological laws cross-culturally valid? Journal of Cross-Cultural Psychology, 18, 383-470.
2. Bangerter, A., & Lehmann, K. (1997). Serial reproduction as a method for studying social representations. Papers on Social Representations, 6, 141-154.
3. Fausto-Sterling, A. (1985). Myths of gender. New York: Basic Books.
4. Grammer, K. (1995). Signale der Liebe: Die biologischen Gesetze der Partnerschaft. (Signals of Love: The Biological Laws of Partnership, German). München: Deutscher Taschenbuch Verlag.
5. Haste, H. (1993). The sexual metaphor. Hemel Hempstead: Harvester-Wheatsheaf.
6. Martin, E. (1987). The woman in the body a cultural analysis of reproduction. Boston, MA: Beacon Press.
7. Vonk, R., & van Vliet, K. P. (1998). Comment on Wagner, Elejabarrieta and Lahnsteiner (1995): From sperm and ovum to gender stereotypes. European Journal of Social Psychology. 28, 115-121.
8. Wagner, W., Elejabarrieta, F., & Lahnsteiner, I. (1995). How the sperm dominates the ovum - Objectification by metaphor in the social representation of conception. European Journal of Social Psychology, 25, 671-688.