"Thou shalt not sit with statisticians, nor commit a social science": How trial courts address social science evidence in redistricting cases

American Journal of Political Science

Volumn 42, Issue 2, 1998, Pages 702-704

  Buchman, Jeremy ^a  

^a STANFORD UNIVERSITY   (United States)

Author keywords

[No Author keywords available]

Indexed keywords

EID: 0032392855     PISSN: 00925853     EISSN: None     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.2307/2991777     Document Type: Review

References (8)

1. Barker, Lucius J. 1967. "Third Parties in Litigation: A Systemic View of the Judicial Function." Journal of Politics 29:41-69.
2. Bickel, Alexander M. 1962, 1986. The Least Dangerous Branch: The Supreme Court at the Bar of Politics. 2nd ed. New Haven: Yale University Press.
3. Chayes, Abram. 1976. "The Role of the Judge in Public Law Litigation." Harvard Law Review 89:1281-316.
4. Fiss, Owen. 1979. "The Supreme Court, 1978 Term - Foreword: The Forms of Justice." Harvard Law Review 93:1-58.
5. Fuller, Lon L. 1978. "The Forms and Limits of Adjudication." Harvard Law Review 92:353-409.
6. Horowitz, Donald L. 1977. The Courts and Social Policy. Washington, DC: Brookings Institution.
7. Rebell, Michael A., and Arthur R. Block. 1982. Educational Policy Making and the Courts: An Empirical Study of Judicial Activism. Chicago: University of Chicago Press.
8. Rosenberg, Gerald N. 1991. The Hollow Hope: Can Courts Bring About Social Change? Chicago: University of Chicago Press.