-
5
-
-
0008647690
-
-
G. Thornton, F. C. Morrison, S. Partington, B. C. Tofield and D. E. Williams: J. Phys. C: Solid State Phys. 21 (1988) 2871.
-
(1988)
J. Phys. C: Solid State Phys.
, vol.21
, pp. 2871
-
-
Thornton, G.1
Morrison, F.C.2
Partington, S.3
Tofield, B.C.4
Williams, D.E.5
-
8
-
-
0542437614
-
-
C. S. Naiman, R. Gilmore, B. Dibartolo, A. Linz and R. Santoro: J. Appl. Phys. 36 (1965) 1041.
-
(1965)
J. Appl. Phys.
, vol.36
, pp. 1041
-
-
Naiman, C.S.1
Gilmore, R.2
Dibartolo, B.3
Linz, A.4
Santoro, R.5
-
17
-
-
34247326717
-
-
K. Asai, O. Yokokura, N. Nishimori, U. Chou, J. M. Tranquada, G. Shirane, S. Higuchi, Y. Okajima and K. Kohn: Phys. Rev. B 50 (1994) 3025.
-
(1994)
Phys. Rev. B
, vol.50
, pp. 3025
-
-
Asai, K.1
Yokokura, O.2
Nishimori, N.3
Chou, U.4
Tranquada, J.M.5
Shirane, G.6
Higuchi, S.7
Okajima, Y.8
Kohn, K.9
-
19
-
-
0000584598
-
-
M. Abbate, J. C. Fuggle, A. Fujimori, L. H. Tjeng, C. T. Chen, R. Potze, G. A. Sawatzky, H. Eisaki and S. Uchida: Phys. Rev. B 47 (1993) 16124.
-
(1993)
Phys. Rev. B
, vol.47
, pp. 16124
-
-
Abbate, M.1
Fuggle, J.C.2
Fujimori, A.3
Tjeng, L.H.4
Chen, C.T.5
Potze, R.6
Sawatzky, G.A.7
Eisaki, H.8
Uchida, S.9
-
25
-
-
0000144063
-
-
M. A. Korotin, S. Y. Ezhov, I. V. Solovyev, V. I. Anisimov, D. I. Khomskii and G. A. Sawatzky: Phys. Rev. B 54 (1996) 5309.
-
(1996)
Phys. Rev. B
, vol.54
, pp. 5309
-
-
Korotin, M.A.1
Ezhov, S.Y.2
Solovyev, I.V.3
Anisimov, V.I.4
Khomskii, D.I.5
Sawatzky, G.A.6
-
27
-
-
0001498526
-
-
T. Saitoh, T. Mizokawa, A. Fujimori, M. Abbate, Y. Takeda and M. Takano: Phys. Rev. B 55 (1997) 4257.
-
(1997)
Phys. Rev. B
, vol.55
, pp. 4257
-
-
Saitoh, T.1
Mizokawa, T.2
Fujimori, A.3
Abbate, M.4
Takeda, Y.5
Takano, M.6
-
28
-
-
21744439251
-
-
K. Asai, O. Yokokura, M. Suzuki, T. Naka, T. Matsumoto, H. Takahashi, N. Môri and K. Kohn: J. Phys. Soc. Jpn. 66 (1997) 967.
-
(1997)
J. Phys. Soc. Jpn.
, vol.66
, pp. 967
-
-
Asai, K.1
Yokokura, O.2
Suzuki, M.3
Naka, T.4
Matsumoto, T.5
Takahashi, H.6
Môri, N.7
Kohn, K.8
-
30
-
-
85034471265
-
-
note
-
It should be noted that Heikes, Miller and Mazelsky (ref. 1) considered an IS, S = 1 state to account for the effective moment obtained from the susceptibility below the ∼500-K transition.
-
-
-
-
32
-
-
85034476046
-
-
note
-
The assumption of the Curie law is supported by the pressure dependence of the susceptibility (ref. 28).
-
-
-
-
34
-
-
85034484172
-
-
note
-
0(T).
-
-
-
-
35
-
-
85034473501
-
-
note
-
3 (ref. 36). The corresponding range for ξ is between 41 and 69 eV.
-
-
-
-
37
-
-
85034467232
-
-
note
-
s.
-
-
-
-
38
-
-
85034486208
-
-
note
-
2 through the lattice expansion is suggested as an origin of the sharpness of the 500-K transition; however, we have demonstrated with our model 1 (see dotted lines in Figs. 4 and 5) that lattice expansion alone is not sufficient to explain the sharpness.
-
-
-
|