|
Volumn 31, Issue 1, 1998, Pages 13-47
|
End-of-life decision making: what we don't know, we make up; what we do know, we ignore.
|
Author keywords
[No Author keywords available]
|
Indexed keywords
ACTIVE EUTHANASIA;
ARTICLE;
ASSISTED SUICIDE;
DEATH AND EUTHANASIA;
DOCTOR PATIENT RELATION;
EMPIRICAL RESEARCH;
GOVERNMENT;
GOVERNMENT REGULATION;
HUMAN;
JURISPRUDENCE;
LEGAL APPROACH;
LEGAL ASPECT;
LIVING WILL;
NURSE ATTITUDE;
PAIN;
PALLIATIVE THERAPY;
PASSIVE EUTHANASIA;
PERSONAL AUTONOMY;
PHYSICIAN ATTITUDE;
PUBLIC OPINION;
RIGHT TO DIE;
STUDY TO UNDERSTAND PROGNOSES AND PREFERENCES FOR OUTCOMES AND RISKS OF TREATMENTS (SUPPORT);
TERMINAL CARE;
UNITED STATES;
VACCO V. QUILL;
VULNERABLE POPULATION;
WASHINGTON V. GLUCKSBERG;
DEATH AND EUTHANASIA;
LEGAL APPROACH;
STUDY TO UNDERSTAND PROGNOSES AND PREFERENCES FOR OUTCOMES AND RISKS OF TREATMENTS (SUPPORT);
VACCO V. QUILL;
WASHINGTON V. GLUCKSBERG;
ADVANCE DIRECTIVE ADHERENCE;
ADVANCE DIRECTIVES;
EMPIRICAL RESEARCH;
EUTHANASIA, ACTIVE;
EUTHANASIA, PASSIVE;
FEDERAL GOVERNMENT;
GOVERNMENT REGULATION;
HUMANS;
NURSE'S ROLE;
PAIN;
PALLIATIVE CARE;
PERSONAL AUTONOMY;
PHYSICIAN'S ROLE;
PHYSICIAN-PATIENT RELATIONS;
PUBLIC OPINION;
RIGHT TO DIE;
STATE GOVERNMENT;
SUICIDE, ASSISTED;
SUPREME COURT DECISIONS;
TERMINAL CARE;
UNITED STATES;
VULNERABLE POPULATIONS;
|
EID: 0032374037
PISSN: 00904198
EISSN: None
Source Type: Journal
DOI: None Document Type: Article |
Times cited : (7)
|
References (0)
|