Restoring prosperity: Why the U.S. model is not the answer for the United States or Europe

Journal of Post Keynesian Economics

Volumn 20, Issue 3, 1998, Pages 337-353

  Palley, Thomas I ^a  

^a AFL CIO   (United States)

Author keywords

[No Author keywords available]

Indexed keywords

EID: 0032369965     PISSN: 01603477     EISSN: None     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1080/01603477.1998.11490158     Document Type: Review

References (7)

1. Atkinson, A.; Rainwater, L.; and Smeeding, T.M. Income Distribution in OECD Countries: Evidence from the Luxembourg Income Study. Paris: OECD, 1995.
2. Bernstein, J., and Mishel, L. "A Comparison of Income, Wages and Employment Trends of the Advanced Industrial Economies." In L. Mishel and J. Schmitt (eds.), Beware the U.S. Model: Jobs and Wages in a Deregulated Economy. Washington, DC: Economic Policy Institute, 1995.
3. Davidson, P. Post Keynesian Macroeconomic Theory: A Foundation for Successful Economic Policies for the Twenty-first Century. Aldershot, UK: Edward Elgar, 1994.
4. Lombard, M. "A Re-examination of the Reasons for the Failure of Keynesian Expansionary Policies in France, 1981-1983." Cambridge Economic Journal, 1995, 19, 359-372.
5. Mishel, L., and Schmitt, J., eds. Beware the U.S. Model: Jobs and Wages in a Deregulated Economy. Washington, DC: Economic Policy Institute, 1995.
6. Organization for Economic Cooperation and Development. OECD Economic Surveys, 1996. Paris: OECD, 1997.
7. Smeeding, T.M. "Why the U.S. Antipoverty System Doesn't Work Very Well." Challenge, January-February 1992, 30-35.