The incentive for non-price discrimination by an input monopolist

International Journal of Industrial Organization

Volumn 16, Issue 3, 1998, Pages 271-284

  Economides, Nicholas ^a  

^a NEW YORK UNIVERSITY   (United States)

Author keywords

Discrimination; Monopoly; Vertical integration

Indexed keywords

EID: 0032368948     PISSN: 01677187     EISSN: None     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1016/s0167-7187(98)00005-8     Document Type: Article

References (8)

1. Beard, T.R., Kaserman, D.I., Mayo, J.W., 1996. Regulation, Vertical Integration, and Sabotage. Mimeo.
2. Bernheim D., Willig, R., 1996. The Scope of competition in telecommunications. AEI Studies in Telecommunications Deregulation, Working Paper; October 25, 1996.
3. Economides, N., 1998. Quality choice and vertical integration. International Journal of Industrial Organization, forthcoming.
4. Economides, N., 1996. The economics of networks. International Journal of Industrial Organization 14 (6), 675-699.
5. Economides, N., Lehr, W., 1995. The quality of complex systems and industry structure.In: Lehr, W. (Ed.), Quality and Reliability of Telecommunications Infrastructure. Lawrence Erlbaum, Hillsdale, 1995.
6. New Zealand Ministry of Commerce, 1995. Regulation of access to vertically-integrated natural monopolies
7. Sibley, D., Weisman, D., 1995. Competitive Incentives of Vertically Integrated Local Exchange Carriers. Mimeo.
8. United States Department of Justice, 1997. Petition by the United States for an order to show cause why respondent Microsoft Corporation should not be found in civil contempt, filed October 20, 1997.