Teachers' judgments of students' academic functioning: A comparison of actual and predicted performances

School Psychology Quarterly

Volumn 13, Issue 1, 1998, Pages 8-24

  Demaray, Michelle K ^a   Elliott, Stephen N ^a  

^a UNIVERSITY OF WISCONSIN MADISON   (United States)

Author keywords

[No Author keywords available]

Indexed keywords

EID: 0032366133     PISSN: 10453830     EISSN: None     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1037/h0088969     Document Type: Review

References (32)

1. Achenbach, T., & Edelbrock, C. (1983). Manual for the Child Behavior Checklist and Revised Child Behavior Profile. Burlington: University of Vermont, Department of Psychiatry.
2. Airasian, P. W., Kellaghan, T., Madaus, G. F., & Pedulla, J. J. (1977). Proportion and direction of teacher rating changes of pupils' progress attributable to standardized test information. Journal of Educational Psychology, 69, 668-678.
3. Bennett, R. E., Gottesman, R. L., Rock, D. A., & Cerullo, F. (1993). Influence of behavior perceptions and gender on teachers' judgments of students' academic skill. Journal of Educational Psychology, 85, 347-356.
4. Borko, H., Cone, R., Russo, N. A., & Shavelson, R. J. (1979). Teachers' decision making. In P. L. Peterson & H. J. Walberg (Eds.), Research on teaching: Concepts, findings, and implications (pp. 136-160) Berkeley, CA: McCutchan.
5. Coladarci, T. (1986). Accuracy of teacher judgments of student responses to standardized test items. Journal of Educational Psychology, 78, 141-146.
6. Doherty, J., & Conolly, M. (1985). How accurately can primary school teachers predict the scores of their pupils in standardised test of attainment? A study of noncognitive factors that influence specific judgments. Educational Studies, 11, 41-60.
7. Dunn, L., & Markwardt, F. (1970). Peabody Individual Achievement Test. Circle Pines, MN: American Guidance Service.
8. DuPaul, G. J., Rapport, M. D., & Perriello, L. M. (1991). Teacher ratings of academic skills: The development of the academic performance rating scale. School Psychology Review, 20, 284-300.
9. Elliott, S. N. (1991). Authentic assessment: An introduction to a neobehavioral approach to classroom assessment. School Psychology Quarterly, 6, 273-278.
10. Farr, R., & Roelke, P. (1971). Measuring subskills of reading: Intercorrelations between standardized reading test, teachers' ratings, and reading specialists' ratings. Journal of Educational Measurement, 8, 27-32.
11. Gerber, M. M., & Semmel, M. I. (1984). Teacher as imperfect test: Reconceptualizing the referral process. Educational Psychologist, 19, 137-148.
12. Goyette, C. H., Conners, C. K., & Ulrich, R. F. (1978). Normative data on Revised Conners Parent and Teacher Rating Scales. Journal of Abnormal Child Psychology, 6, 221-236.
13. Gresham, F. M., & Elliott, S. N. (1990). The Social Skills Rating System. Circle Pines, MN: American Guidance Service.
14. Gresham, F. M., Reschly, D. J., & Carey, M. P. (1987). Teachers as "tests": Classification, accuracy and concurrent validation in the identification of learning disabled children. School Psychology Review, 16, 543-553.
15. Harter, S. (1985). Manual for the Self-Perception Profile for Children. Denver, CO: University of Denver.
16. Helmke, A., & Schrader, F. W. (1987). Interactional effects of instructional quality and teacher judgment accuracy on achievement. Teaching and Teacher Education, 3, 91-98.
17. Hoge, R. D., & Butcher R. (1984). Analysis of teacher judgments of pupil achievement levels. Journal of Educational Psychology, 76, 777-781.
18. Hoge, R. D., & Coladarci, T. (1989). Teacher-based judgments of academic achievement: A review of the literature. Review of Educational Research, 59, 297-313.
19. Hopkins, K. D., Dobson, J. C., & Oldridge, O. A. (1962). The concurrent and congruent validities of the Wide Range Achievement Test. Educational and Psychological Measurement, 22, 177-182.
20. Hopkins, K, D., George, C. A., & Williams, D. D. (1985). The concurrent validity of standardized achievement tests by content area using teachers' ratings as criteria. Journal of Educational Measurement, 22, 177-182.
21. Kaufman, A. S., & Kaufman, N. L. (1985). Kaufman Test of Educational Achievement- Brief Form. Circle Pines, MN: American Guidance Service.
22. Leinhardt, G. (1983). Novice and expert knowledge of individual student's achievement. Educational Psychologist, 18, 165-179.
23. Luce, S. R., & Hoge, R. D. (1978). Relation among teacher rankings, pupil-teacher interactions, and academic achievement: A test of the teacher expectancy hypothesis. American Educational Research Journal, 15, 489-500.
24. McGraw-Hill. (1982). The Comprehensive Test of Basic Skills. Monteray, CA: Author.
25. Oliver, J. E., & Arnold, R. D. (1978). Comparing a standardized test, an informal inventory, and teacher judgment on third-grade reading. Reading Improvement, 15, 56-59.
26. Pedulla, J. J., Airasian, P. W., & Madaus, G. F. (1980). Do teacher ratings and standardized test results of students yield the same information? American Educational Research Journal, 17, 303-307.
27. Reschly, D. J., Gresham, F. M., & Graham-Clay, S. (1984). Multifactorial nonbiased assessment: Convergent and discriminent validity of social and cognitive measures with black and white regular and special education students. Washington, DC: United States Department of Education, Grant No. G00 811 01156, Assistance Catalog No. CFDA: 84-023E.
28. Sharpley, C. F., & Edgar, E. (1986). Teachers' ratings vs. standardized tests: An empirical investigation of assessment between two indices of achievement. Psychology in the Schools, 23, 106-111.
29. Silverstein, A. B., Brownlee, L., Legutki, G., & MacMillan, D. L. (1983). Convergent and discriminant validation of two methods of assessing three academic traits. The Journal of Special Education, 17, 63-68.
30. Stephens, T. (1981). Technical manual: Social Behavior Assessment. Columbus, Ohio: Cedars Press.
31. Wechsler, D. (1974). Wechsler Intelligence Scale for Children-Revised. New York: Psychological Corporation.
32. Wright, D., & Wiese, M. J. (1988). Teacher judgment in student evaluation: A comparison of grading methods. Journal of Educational Research, 82, 10-14.