Ingroup bias and dimensional relevan

Swiss Journal of Psychology

Volumn 57, Issue 3, 1998, Pages 153-162

  Devos, Thierry ^a  

^a UNIVERSITY OF CALIFORNIA   (United States)

Author keywords

Dimensional relevance; Ingroup bias; Intergroup dynamics; Social identity

Indexed keywords

EID: 0032364170     PISSN: 14210185     EISSN: None     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: None     Document Type: Article

References (29)

1. Brewer, M. B. (1979), In-group bias in the minimal intergroup situation: A cognitive-motivational analysis. Psychological Bulletin, 86, 307-324.
2. Clémence, A. & Doise, W. (1993). Catégorisation sociale et comportement de discrimination dans une táche d'allocation d'argent à soi et aux membres de l'intraet du hors-groupe. In J. L. Beauvois, R. V. Joule & J. M. Monteil (Eds), Perspectives cognitives et conduites sociales (Vol. 4, pp. 247-267). Neuchâtel: Delachaux et Niestlé.
3. Codol, J. P. (1973). Existe-t-il un phénomène de "conformité supérieure" du groupe propre? Cahiers de Psychologie, 16, 25-30.
4. Codol, J. P. (1975). On the so-called "superior conformity of the self" behavior: Twenty experimental investigations. European Jnnrnal of Social Psychology, 5, 457-501.
5. Condor, S., Brown, R. & Williams, J. (1987). Social identification and intergroup behaviour. The Quarterly Journal of Social Affairs. 3, 299-317.
6. Deschamps, J.C. (1982). Social identity and relations of power between groups. In H. Tajfel (Ed.), Social identity and intergroup relations (pp. 85-98). Cambridge - Paris: Cambridge University Press - Maison des Sciences de l'Homme.
7. Doise, W. (1973). Relations et représentations intergroupes. In S. Moscovici (Ed.). Introduction à la psychologie sociale (Vol. 2. pp. 194-213). Paris: Larousse.
8. Doise, W. (1978). Groups and individuals: Explanations in social psychology. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
9. Hinkle, S. & Brown, R. (1990). Intergroup comparisons and social identity: Some links and lacunae. In D. Abrams & M. A. Hogg (Eds.), Social identity theory: Constructive and critical advances (pp. 48-70). New York: Harvester Wheatsheaf.
10. Hinkle, S. & Schopler, J. (1986). Bias in the evaluation of ingroup and outgroup performance. In S. Worchel & W. G. Austin (Eds.), Psychology of intergroup relations (pp. 196-212). Chicago: Nelson-Hall.
11. Jetten, J., Spears, R. & Manstead, A. (1996). Intergroup norms and intergroup discrimination: Distinctive self-categorization and social identity effects. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 71, 1222-1233.
12. Lindeman, M. & Koskela, P. (1994). Group size, controllability of group membership, and comparative dimension as determinants of intergroup discrimination. European Journal of Social Psychology, 24, 267-278.
13. Locksley, A., Ortiz, V. & Hepburn, C. (1980). Social categorization and discriminatory behavior: Extinguishing the minimal intergroup discrimination effect. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 39, 773-783.
14. Mugny, G., Sanchez-Mazas, M., Roux, P. & Pérez, J. A. (1991). Independence and interdependence of group judgments: Xenophobia and minority influence. European Journal of Social Psychology, 21, 213-223.
15. Mullen, B., Brown, R. & Smith, C. (1992). Ingroup bias as a function of salience, relevance, and status: An integration. European Journal of Social Psychology, 22, 103-122.
16. Mummendey, A. & Schreiber, H. J. (1983). Better or just different? Positive social identity by discrimination against, or by differenliation from outgroups. European Journal of Social Psychology, 13, 389-397.
17. Mummendey, A. & Schreiber, H. J. (1984). "Different" just means "better" : Some obvious and some hidden pathways to in-sroup favouritism. British Journal of Social Psychology, 23, 363-368.
18. Mummendey, A. & Simon, B. (1989). Better or different? III. The impact of importance of comparison dimension and relative in-group size upon intergroup discrimination. British Journal of Social Psychology, 28, 1-16.
19. Ng, S. H. (1978). Minimal social categorization, political categorization, and power change. Human Relations, 31, 765-779.
20. Ng, S. H. (1982). Power and intergroup discrimination. In H. Tajfel (Ed.), Social identity and intergroup relations (pp. 179-206). Cambridge - Paris: Cambridge University Press - Maison des Sciences de l'Homme.
21. Platow, M. J., McClintock, C. G. & Liebrand, W. B. (1990). Predicting intergroup fairness and ingroup bias in the minimal group paradigm. European Journal of Social Psychology, 20, 221-239.
22. Roccas, S. & Schwanz, S. H. (1993). Effects of intergroup similarity on intergroup relations. European Journal of Social Psychology, 23, 581-595.
23. Sanchez-Mazas, M., Roux, P. & Mugny, G. (1994). When the outgroup becomes ingroup and when the ingroup becomes outgroup: Xenophobia and social categorization in a resource allocation task. European Journal of Social Psychology, 24, 417-423.
24. Schwanz, S. H., Struch, N. & Bilsky, W. (1990). Values and intergroup social motives: A study of Israeli and German students. Social Psychology Quarterly 53, 185-198.
25. Sherif, M. (1966). In common predicament: Social psychology of intergroup conflict and cooperation. Boston: Houghton Mifflin Company.
26. Tajfel, H. (1974). Social identity and intergroup behaviour. Social Science Information, 13, 65-93.
27. Tajfel, H., Billig, M. G., Bundy, R. P. & Flament, C. (1971). Social categorization and intergroup behaviour. European Journal of Social Psychology, 1, 149-178.
28. Tajfel, H. & Turner, J. C. (1986). The social identity theory of intergroup behavior. In S. Worchel & W. G. Austin (Eds.), Psychology of intergroup relations (pp. 7-24). Chicago: Nelson-Hall.
29. van Knippenberg, A. & Ellemers, N. (1990). Social identity and intergroup differentiation processes. In W. Stroebe & M. Hewstone (Eds.), European Review of Social Psychology (Vol. 1, pp. 137-169). Chichester: Wiley.