Public good provision under environmental and social uncertainty

European Journal of Social Psychology

Volumn 28, Issue 2, 1998, Pages 249-256

  Wit, Arjaan ^a   Wilke, Henk ^b  

^a LEIDEN UNIVERSITY   (Netherlands)

^b NONE

Author keywords

[No Author keywords available]

Indexed keywords

EID: 0032363463     PISSN: 00462772     EISSN: None     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1002/(SICI)1099-0992(199803/04)28:2<249::AID-EJSP868>3.0.CO;2-J     Document Type: Article

References (21)

1. Baron, G. W., & Kenny, D. A. (1986). The moderator mediator variable distinction in social psychological research: Conceptual, strategic, and statistic considerations. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 51, 1173-1182.
2. Budescu, D. V., Rapoport, A., & Suleiman, R. (1990). Resource dilemmas with environmental uncertainty and asymmetric players. European Journal of Social Psychology, 20, 475-487.
3. Budescu, D. V., Rapoport, A., & Suleiman, R. (1992). Simultaneous vs. sequential requests in resource dilemmas with incomplete information. Acta Psychologica, 80, 297-310.
4. Budescu, D. V., Rapoport, A., & Suleiman, R. (1995). Common pool resource dilemmas under uncertainty: Qualitative tests of equilibrium solutions. Games and Economic Behavior, 10, 171-201.
5. Budescu, D. V., Suleiman, R., & Rapoport, A. (1995). Positional order and group size effects in resource dilemmas with uncertain resources. Organizational Behavior and Human Decision Processes, 61, 225-238.
6. Chen, X. P., Au, W. T., & Komorita, S. S. (1996). Sequential choice in a step-level public goods dilemma: The effects of criticality and uncertainty. Organizational Behavior and Human Decision Processes, 65, 37-47.
7. Dawes, R. M. (1980). Social dilemmas. Annual Review of Psychology, 31, 169-193.
8. DeVries, S., & Wilke, H. A. M. (1992). Constrained egoism and resource management under uncertainty. In W. B. G. Liebrand et al. (Eds), Social dilemmas: Theoretical issues and research findings (pp. 81-100). Oxford: Pergamon Press.
9. DeVries, S., & Wilke, H. A. M. (1995). An advisor in resource management situations. Configural weighing of recommendations. Journal of Economic Psychology, 16, 115-135.
10. Festinger, L. (1954). A theory of social comparison processes. Human Relations, 7, 117-140.
11. Kriss, M., Kinchla, R. A., & Darley, J. M. (1977). A mathematical model for social influences on perceptual judgements. Journal of Experimental Social Psychology, 13, 402-430.
12. Liebrand, W. B. G., Wilke, H. A. M., Vogel, R., & Wolters, F. J. M. (1986). Value orientation and conformity in three types of social dilemma games. Journal of Conflict Resolution, 30, 77-97.
13. Messick, D. M., Allison, S. T., & Samuelson, C. D. (1988). Framing and communication effects on group members' responses to environmental and social uncertainty. In S. Maital (Ed.), Applied behavioral economics 2 (pp. 677-700). Brighton: Wheatsheaf.
14. Messick, D. M., Wilke, H. A. M., Brewer, M. B., Kramer, R. M., Zemke, P. E., & Lui, L. (1983). Individual adaptations and structural change as solutions to social dilemmas. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 44, 294-309.
15. Rapoport, A., Budescu, D. V., Suleiman, R., & Weg, E. (1992). Social dilemmas with uniformly distributed resources. In W. B. G. Liebrand et al. (Eds), Social dilemmas: Theoretical issues and research findings (pp. 43-57). Oxford: Pergamon Press.
16. Rapoport, A., & Suleiman, R. (1992). Equilibrium solutions for resource dilemmas. Group Decision and Negotiation, 1, 269-294.
17. Rutte, C. G., Wilke, H. A. M., & Messick, D. M. (1987). Scarcity or abundance caused by people or the environment as determinants of behavior in the resource dilemma. Journal of Experimental Social Psychology, 23, 208-216.
18. Suleiman, R., Budescu, D. V., & Rapoport, A. (1994). The position effect: The role of a player's serial position in a resource dilemma game. In U. Schulz, W. Albers, & U. Mueller (Eds), Social dilemmas and cooperation (pp. 55-73). Berlin: Springer.
19. Suleiman, R., & Rapoport, A. (1988). Environmental and social uncertainty in single trial resource dilemmas. Acta Psychologica, 68, 99-112.
20. Suleiman, R., & Rapoport, A. (1992). Provision of step-level public goods with continuous contribution. Journal of Behavioral Decision Making, 5, 133-153.
21. VanderKragt, A. J. C., Orbell, J. M., & Dawes, R. M. (1983). The minimal contributing set as solution to public goods problems. American Political Science Review, 77, 112-122.