Multiple Comparison Procedures for Trimmed Means

Psychological Methods

Volumn 3, Issue 1, 1998, Pages 123-141

  Keselman, H J ^a   Lix, Lisa M ^a   Kowalchuk, Rhonda K ^a  

^a UNIVERSITY OF MANITOBA   (Canada)

Author keywords

[No Author keywords available]

Indexed keywords

EID: 0032361351     PISSN: 1082989X     EISSN: None     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1037/1082-989X.3.1.123     Document Type: Article

References (57)

1. Alexander, R. A., & Govern, D. M. (1994). A new and simpler approximation for ANOVA under variance heterogeneity. Journal of Educational Statistics, 19, 91-101.
2. Box, G. E. P. (1954). Some theorems on quadratic forms applied in the study of analysis of variance problems, I. Effect of inequality of variance in the one-way classification. Annals of Mathematical Statistics, 25, 290-302.
3. Bradley, J. V. (1978). Robustness? British Journal of Mathematical and Statistical Psychology, 31, 144-152.
4. Brown, M. B., & Forsythe, A. B. (1974). The small sample behavior of some statistics which test the equality of several means. Technometrics, 16, 129-132.
5. Coombs, W. T., Algina, J., & Oltman, D. O. (1996). Univariate and multivariate omnibus hypothesis tests selected to control Type I error rates when population variances are not necessarily equal. Review of Educational Research, 66, 137-179.
6. Cressie, N. A. C., & Whitford, H. J. (1986). How to use the two-sample t-test. Biometrical Journal, 28, 131-148.
7. D'Agostino, R. B., Belanger, A., & D'Agostino, R. B., Jr. (1990). A suggestion for using powerful and informative tests of normality. The American Statistician, 44, 316-321.
8. Duncan, D. B. (1957). Multiple range tests for correlated and heteroscedastic means. Biometrics, 13, 164-176.
9. Dunnett, C. W. (1980). Pairwise multiple comparisons in the unequal variance case. Journal of the American Statistical Association, 76, 796-800.
10. Dunnett, C. W. (1982). Robust multiple comparisons. Communications in Statistics, Theory and Methods, 11, 2611-2629.
11. Einot, I., & Gabriel, K. R. (1975). A study of the powers of several methods in multiple comparisons. Journal of the American Statistical Association, 70, 574-583.
12. Fenstad, G. U. (1983). A comparison between U and V tests in the Behrens-Fisher problem. Biometrika, 70, 300-302.
13. Fisher, R. A. (1935). The design of experiments. Edinburgh, Scotland: Oliver & Boyd.
14. Glass, G. V., Peckham, P. D., & Sanders, J. R. (1972). Consequences of failure to meet assumptions underlying the fixed effects analyses of variance and covariance. Review of Educational Research, 42, 237-288.
15. Harwell, M. R. (1992). Summarizing Monte Carlo results in methodological research. Journal of Educational Statistics, 17, 297-313.
16. Hastings, N. A. J., & Peacock, J. B. (1975). Statistical distributions: A handbook for students and practitioners. New York: Wiley.
17. Hayter, A. J. (1986). The maximum family wise error rate of Fisher's least significant difference test. Journal of the American Statistical Association, 81, 1000-1004.
18. Hoaglin, D. C. (1985). Summarizing shape numerically: The g- and h-distributions. In D. Hoaglin, F. Mosteller, & J. Tukey (Eds.), Exploring data tables, trends, and shapes (pp. 461-513). New York: Wiley.
19. Hochberg, Y. (1988). A sharper Bonferroni procedure for multiple tests of significance. Biometrika, 75, 800-802.
20. Hochberg, Y., & Tamhane, A. C. (1987). Multiple comparison procedures. New York: Wiley.
21. James, G. S. (1951). The comparison of several groups of observations when the ratios of the population variances are unknown. Biometrika, 38, 324-329.
22. Keselman, H. J. (1994). Stepwise and simultaneous multiple comparison procedures of repeated measures' means. Journal of Educational Statistics, 19, 127-162.
23. Keuls, M. (1952). The use of the "Studentized range" in conjunction with an analysis of variance. Euphytica, 1, 112-122.
24. Lix, L. M., Cribbie, R., & Keselman, H. J. (1997). The analysis of between-subjects univariate designs. Manuscript submitted for publication.
25. Lix, L. M., & Keselman, H. J. (in press). To trim or not to trim: Tests of location equality under heteroscedasticity and nonnormality. Educational and Psychological Measurement.
26. Lix, L. M., Keselman, J. C., & Keselman, H. J. (1996). Consequences of assumption violations revisited: A quantitative review of alternatives to the one-way analysis of variance F test. Review of Educational Research, 66, 579-620.
27. Maxwell, S. E., & Delaney, H. D. (1990). Designing experiments and analyzing data: A model comparison perspective. Belmont, CA: Wadsworth.
28. Micceri, T. (1989). The unicorn, the normal curve, and other improbable creatures. Psychological Bulletin, 105, 156-166.
29. Newman, D. (1939). The distribution of the range in samples from a normal population expressed in terms of an independent estimate of standard deviation. Biometrika, 31, 20-30.
30. m, test under heteroscedasticity and non-normality. British Journal of Mathematical and Statistical Psychology, 45, 255-263.
31. Peritz, E. (1970). A note on multiple comparisons. Unpublished manuscript, Hebrew University, Jerusalem, Israel.
32. Ramsey, P. H. (1978). Power differences between pairwise multiple comparisons. Journal of the American Statistical Association, 73, 479-487.
33. Ramsey, P. H., & Ramsey, P. P. (1990). Critical values for two multiple comparison procedures based on the Studentized range distribution. Journal of Educational Statistics, 15, 341-352.
34. Rubin, A. S. (1983). The use of weighted contrasts in analysis of models with heterogeneity of variance. Proceedings of the Business and Economic Statistics Section, American Statistical Association, 347-352.
35. Ryan, T. A. (1960). Significance tests for multiple comparisons of proportions, variances and other statistics. Psychological Bulletin, 57, 318-328.
36. SAS Institute, Inc. (1989). SAS/IML software: Usage and reference, version 6 (1st ed.). Cary, NC: Author.
37. Sawilowsky, S. S., & Blair, R. C. (1992). A more realistic look at the robustness and Type II error probabilities of the t test to departures from population normality. Psychological Bulletin, 111, 352-360.
38. Shaffer, J. P. (1974). Multiple comparisons with unequal sample sizes. Psychological Reports, 35, 572-574.
39. Shaffer, J. P. (1979). Comparison of means: An F test followed by a modified multiple range procedure. Journal of Educational Statistics, 4, 14-23.
40. Shaffer, J. P. (1986). Modified sequentially rejective multiple test procedures. Journal of the American Statistical Association, 81, 826-831.
41. Shaffer, J. P. (1994). Multiple hypothesis testing: A review (Report No. 23). Research Triangle Park, NC: National Institute of Statistical Sciences.
42. Staudte, R. G., & Sheather, S. J. (1990). Robust estimation and testing. New York: Wiley.
43. Toothaker, L. E. (1991). Multiple comparisons for researchers. Newbury Park, CA: Sage.
44. Tukey, J. W. (1960). A survey of sampling from contaminated distributions. In I. Olkin, W. Hoeffding, S. Ghurye, W. Madow, & H. Mann (Eds.), Contributions to probability and statistics (pp. 448-485). Stanford, CA: Stanford University Press.
45. Welch, B. L. (1938). The significance of the difference between two means when the population variances are unequal. Biometrika, 29, 350-362.
46. Welch, B. L. (1951). On the comparison of several mean values: An alternative approach. Biometrika, 38, 330-336.
47. Welsch, R. E. (1977). Stepwise multiple comparison procedures. Journal of the American Statistical Association, 72, 566-575.
48. Wilcox, R. R. (1990). Comparing the means of two independent groups. Biometrics Journal, 32, 771-780.
49. Wilcox, R. R. (1993). Robustness in ANOVA. In L. K. Edwards (Ed.), Applied analysis of variance in behavioral science (pp. 345-374). New York: Marcel Dekker.
50. Wilcox, R. R. (1994). A one-way random effects model for trimmed means. Psychometrika, 59, 289-306.
51. Wilcox, R. R. (1995a). ANOVA: A paradigm for low power and misleading measures of effect size? Review of Educational Research, 65(1), 51-77.
52. Wilcox, R. R. (1995b). ANOVA: The practical importance of heteroscedastic methods, using trimmed means versus means, and designing simulation studies. British Journal of Mathematical and Statistical Psychology, 48, 99-114.
53. Wilcox, R. R. (1996). Statistics for the social sciences. New York: Academic Press.
54. Wilcox, R. R. (1997). Three multiple comparison procedures for trimmed means. Biometrical Journal, 37, 643-656.
55. Wilcox, R. R., Charlin, V. L., & Thompson, K. L. (1986). New Monte Carlo results on the robustness of the ANOVA F, W, and F * statistics. Communications in Statistics, Simulation and Computation, 15, 933-943.
56. Yuen, K. K. (1974). The two-sample trimmed t for unequal population variances. Biometrika, 61, 165-170.
57. Yuen, K. K., & Dixon, W. J. (1973). The approximate behaviour and performance of the two-sample trimmed t. Biometrika, 60, 369-374.