Agenda setting, the "third wave," and the administrative state

Administration and Society

Volumn 30, Issue 3, 1998, Pages 211-247

  Durant, Robert F ^a  

^a NONE

Author keywords

[No Author keywords available]

Indexed keywords

EID: 0032358312     PISSN: 00953997     EISSN: None     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1177/0095399798303001     Document Type: Article

References (98)

1. Agranoff, R. (1991). Human services integration: Past and present challenges in public administration. Public Administration Review. 51 (November/December), 1-11.
2. American Management Association. (1994, September 27). AMA survey, New York: Author.
3. Barr, S. (1996, March 25). GAO report details quiet efforts of Gore's "reinvention labs." The Washington Post, p. A15.
4. Barzelay, M. (1992). Breaking through bureaucracy. Berkeley and Los Angeles: University of California Press.
5. Baumgartner, F. R., & Jones, B. D. (1993). Agendas and instability in American politics. Chicago: University of Chicago Press.
6. Berman, E. M. (1997). Dealing with cynical citizens. Public Administration Review, 57(2), 105-112.
7. Bernard, J. R. (1996). Environmental indicators: An integral tool for the future of environmental management. State Environmental Monitor, 1(4), 26-28.
8. Berry, J. M., Portney, K. E., & Thomson, K. (1993). The rebirth of urban democracy. Washington, DC: The Brookings Institution.
9. Broder, D. S. (1998, February 8). The good, the bad, and the budget. The Washington Post, p. C07.
10. Caraley, D. (1996). Dismantling the federal safety net: Fictions versus realities. Political Science Quarterly, 111(2), 225-258.
11. Champy, J. (1996). Reengineering management: The mandate for new leadership. New York: HarperBusiness.
12. Cooper, P. J. (1988). Hard judicial choices: Federal district court judges and state and local officials. New York: Oxford University Press.
13. Cooper, P. J. (1994). Reinvention and employee rights. In P. W. Ingraham & B. S. Romzek (Eds.), New paradigms for government: Issues for the changing public service (Chapter 4). San Francisco: Jossey-Bass.
14. Davenport, T. H. (1995). Why reen+gineering failed - and what comes next? Fast Company, 1(1), 69-74.
15. Denhardt, R. B. (1993). The pursuit of significance: Strategies for managerial success in public organizations. Belmont, CA: Wadsworth.
16. Dionne, E. J. Jr. (1996). They only look dead: Why progressives will dominate the next political era. New York: Simon & Schuster.
17. Disappearing taxes: The tap runs dry. (1997, May 31). Economist, pp. 21-23.
18. Donahue, J. D. (1997). Disunited states. New York: Basic Books.
19. Downs, A. (1996). Corporate executions. New York: American Management Association.
20. Durant, R. F. (1992). Beyond markets, hierarchies, and clans: Lessons from natural resource management in the Reagan era. Administration & Society, 24(3), 346-374.
21. Durant, R. F. (1995). The democratic deficit in America. Political Science Quarterly, 110(Spring), 25-47.
22. Durant, R. F. & Diehl, P. F. (1989). Agendas, alternatives, and public policy: Lessons from the U.S. Foreign policy arena. Journal of Public Policy, 9 (April/June), 179-205.
23. Elmore, R. F. (1982). Backward mapping: Implementation research and policy decisions. In W. Williams (Ed.), Studying implementation: Methodological and administrative issues (pp. 18-35). Chatham, NJ: Chatham House.
24. Fiorina, M. P. (1989). Congress: The keystone of the Washington establishment. New Haven, CT: Yale University Press.
25. Fishkin, J. S. (1991). Democracy and deliberation: New directions for democratic reform. New Haven, CT: Yale University Press
26. Foreman, C. H. Jr. (1988). Signals from the Hill: Congressional oversight and the challenge of social regulation. New Haven, CT: Yale University Press.
27. Frederickson, F. G. (1997). The spirit of public administration. San Francisco: Jossey-Bass.
28. Gaus, J. (1947). Reflections on public administration. Birmingham: The University of Alabama Press.
29. General Accounting Office. (1996). Management reform: Status of agency reinvention lab efforts, Washington, DC: Government Printing Office.
30. General Accounting Office. (1997). The Government Performance and Results Act: 1997 governmentwide implementation will be uneven. Washington, DC: Government Printing Office, GAO/GGD-97-109.
31. Golembiewski, R. T. (1977). A critique of "democratic administration" and its supporting ideation. American Political Science Review, 71(4), 1488-1507.
32. Golembiewski, R. T. (1987). Public sector organization: Why theory and practice should emphasize purpose, and how to do so. In R. C. Chandler (Ed.), A centennial history of the American administrative state (pp. 433-474). New York: Free Press.
33. Gormley, W. (1989). Taming the bureaucracy. Princeton, NJ: Princeton University Press.
34. Hammer, M. (1996). Beyond reengineering: How the process-centered organization is changing our work and our lives. New York: HarperBusiness.
35. Hammer, M., & Champy, J. (1993). Reengineering the corporation: A manifesto for business revolution. New York: HarperBusiness.
36. Hammer, M., & Stanton, S. A. (1995). The reengineering revolution: A handbook. New York: HarperBusiness.
37. Hjern, B., & Porter, D. O. (1981). Implementation structures. A new unit of administrative analysis. Organization Studies, 2(3), 211-227.
38. Ingram, H. M., & Smith, S. R. (Eds.). (1993). Public policy for democracy. Washington, DC: The Brookings Institution.
39. Kagan, R. A. (1995). Adversarial legalism and American government. In M. K. Landy & M. A. Levin (Eds.), The new politics of public policy (Chapter 4). Baltimore: Johns Hopkins University Press.
40. Kanter, R. M. (1997). On the frontiers of management. Boston: Harvard Business School Press.
41. Kettl, D. F. (1993). Sharing power: Public governance and private markets. Washington, DC: The Brookings Institution.
42. Kettl, D. F. (1997, May 5). Reinventing government: Past, present, but is there a future. Lecture and discussion, University of Baltimore.
43. Kettl, D. F., & Dilullio, J. J. (Eds.). (1995). Cutting government: A report of the Brookings Institution's Center for Public Management. Washington, DC: The Brookings Institution.
44. Kettl, D. F., Ingraham, P. W., Sanders, R. P., & Horner, C. (1996). Civil service reform: Building a government that works. Washington, DC: The Brookings Institution.
45. Kingdon, J. W. (1984). Agendas, alternatives, and public policies. New York: Harper Collins.
46. Korten, D. C. (1996). When corporations rule the world. West Hartford, CT, and San Francisco: Kumerian Press and Berrett-Koehler Publishers.
47. Landy, M. K. (1995). The new politics of environmental policy. In M. K. Landy & M. A. Levin (Eds.), The new politics of public policy (pp. 207-227). Baltimore: The Johns Hopkins University Press.
48. Light, P. C. (1995). Thickening government: Federal hierarchy and the diffusion of accountability. Washington, DC: The Brookings Institution.
49. Lind, M. (1995). The next American nation: The new nationalism and the fourth American revolution. New York: Free Press.
50. Lipset, S. M. (1996). American exceptionalism: A double-edged sword. New York: Norton.
51. Madrick, J. (1995). The end of affluence: The causes and consequences of America's economic dilemma. New York: Random House.
52. Mandell, M. P. (1990). Network management: Strategic behavior in the public sector. In R. W. Gage & M. P. Mandell (Eds.), Strategies for managing intergovernmental policies and networks (pp. 29-53). New York: Praeger.
53. Maranto, R. (1998). Thinking the unthinkable in public administration: A case for spoils in the federal bureaucracy. Administration & Society, 29(6), 628-642.
54. Mathews, D. (1994). Politics for people: Finding a responsible public voice. Urbana and Chicago: University of Illinois Press.
55. Meier, K. J. (1997). Bureaucracy and democracy: The case for more bureaucracy and less democracy. Public Administration Review, 57 (May/June), 193-199.
56. Melnick, R, S. (1995). Separation of powers and the strategy of rights: The expansion of special education. In M. K. Landy & M. A. Levin (Eds.), The new politics of public policy (Chapter 2). Baltimore: Johns Hopkins University Press.
57. Michigan abandons high-priority EPA regulatory reinvention project. (1996, June 28). Inside EPA, pp. 1, 11
58. Milward, H. B., & Provan, K. G. (1993). The hollow state: Private provision of public services. In H. M. Ingram & S. R. Smith (Eds.), Public policy for democracy (pp. 222-237). Washington, DC: The Brookings Institution.
59. Mintzberg, H. (1996, May/June). Managing government, governing management. Harvard Business Review, pp. 75-83.
60. Moore, M. H. (1995). Creating public value: Strategic management in government. Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press.
61. Morone, J. A. (1991). The democratic wish: Popular participation and the limits of American government. New York: Basic Books.
62. Niskanen, W. A. Jr. (1971). Bureaucracy and representative government. Chicago: Aldine-Atherton.
63. O'Leary, R., Durant, R. F., Fiorino, D. J., & Weiland, P. (1998). Managing for the environment. San Francisco: Jossey-Bass.
64. Osborne, D., & Plastrik, P. (1997). Banishing bureaucracy: The five strategies for reinventing government. Reading, MA: Addison-Wesley.
65. Ostrom, E. (1990). Governing the commons. Cambridge, UK: Cambridge University Press.
66. Ostrom, E., Gardner, R., & Walker, J. (1994). Rules, games, and common-pool resources. Ann Arbor: University of Michigan Press.
67. O'Toole, L. J. Jr. (1997a). Treating networks seriously: Practical and research-based agendas in public administration. Public Administration Review, 57(1), 45-52.
68. O'Toole, L. J. Jr. (1997b). Implementing public innovations in network settings. Administration & Society, 29(May), 115-138.
69. Perry, J. (1994). Revitalizing employee ties with public organizations. In P. W. Ingraham & B. S. Romzek (Eds.), New paradigms for government: Issues for the changing public service. San Francisco: Jossey-Bass.
70. Peters, B. G., & Savoie, D. J. (1996). Managing incoherence: The coordination and empow& erment conundrum. Public Administration Review, 56(3), 281-290.
71. Peterson, P. E. (1995). The price offederalism. Washington, DC: The Brookings Institution.
72. Pitney Bowes. (1994, October 10). Reengineering among the Fortune 500. Stamford, CT: Author.
73. Provan, K. G., & Milward, H. B. (1995). A preliminary theory of network effectiveness: A comparative study of four mental health systems. Administrative Science Quarterly, 40 (March), 1-33.
74. Radin, B. A. (1995). Varieties of reinventtion: Six NPR "success sories." InD. F. Kettl & J. Dilullio, Jr. (Eds.), Inside the reinvention machine: Appraising governmental reform (pp. 107-130). Washington, DC: The Brookings Institution.
75. Rainey, G. W. (1990). Implementation and managerial creativity. In D. J. Palumbo & D. Cal-ista (Eds.), Implementation and the policy process (pp. 89-105). New York: Greenwood.
76. Rosenbloom, D., & Ross, B. (1994). Administrative theory, political power, and government reform. In P. W. Ingraham & B. S. Romzek (Eds.), New paradigms for government: Issues for the changing public service (Chapter 6). San Francisco: Jossey-Bass.
77. Sandel, M. J. (1996). Democracy's discontent: America in search of a public philosophy. Cambridge, MA: The Belknap Press of Harvard University Press.
78. Schattschneider, E. E. (1960). The semisovereign people. New York: Holt, Rinehart, & Winston.
79. Schick, A. (1980). Congress and money: Budgeting, spending, and taxes. Washington, DC: Urban Institute Press.
80. Slemrod, J. (1992). Taxation and inequality: A time-exposure perspective. In J. Poterba (Ed.), Tax policy and the economy (Vol. 6, pp. 105-128). Cambridge: MIT Press.
81. Smart, T. (1997, October 27). Big mergers get bigger in the '90s: Deregulation, investors propel dealmaking. The Washington Post, p. A1.
82. Stoker, R. P. (1989). A regime framework for implementation analysis: Cooperation and reconciliation of federalist imperatives. Policy Studies Review, 9(1), 29-49.
83. Stone, D. A. (1988). Policy paradox, and political reason. Glenview, IL: Scott, Foresman.
84. Tang, S. Y. (1991). Institutional arrangements and the management of common-pool resources. Public Administration Review, 51 (January/February), 42-51.
85. states seeking "performance agreements" with EPA in fiscal year 1997. (1996, July 26). Inside EPA, pp. 2-3.
86. Thomas, J. C. (1995). Public participation in public decisions. San Francisco: Jossey-Bass.
87. Thompson, F. J. (Ed.). (1993). Revitalizing state and local public service: Strengthening performance, accountability, and citizen confidence (National Commission on the State and Local Public Service). San Francisco: Jossey-Bass.
88. Thompson, J. D. (1967) Organizations in action. New York: McGraw-Hill.
89. Toffler, A. (1980). The third wave. New York: Bantam.
90. Tullock, G. (1965). The politics of bureaucracy. Washington, DC: Public Affairs Press.
91. Waldo, D. (1948). The administrative state: A study of the political theory of American public administration. New York: Ronald Press.
92. Wilson, J. Q. (1989). Bureaucracy. New York: Basic Books.
93. Wilson, W. (1941). The study of administration. Political Science Quarterly, 56, 481-506. (Reprinted from Public Administration Quarterly, 2, June 1887.)
94. Wise, C., & O'Leary, R. (1997). Intergovernmental relations in environmental management and policy. Public Administration Review, 57(2), 150-159.
95. Wolf, C. Jr. (1979, Spring). A theory of non-market failures. Public Interest, pp. 114-133.
96. Wolff, E. N. (1995). Top heavy: A study of increasing inequality of wealth in America. New York: Twentieth Century Fund Press.
97. Wyatt Company. (1994). Best practices in corporate restructuring. Washington, DC: Author.
98. Yankelovich, D. (1991). Coming to public judgment: Making democracy work in a complex world. Syracuse, NY: Syracuse University Press.