Students’ reactions to the introduction of videoconferencing for classroom instruction

Information Society

Volumn 14, Issue 2, 1998, Pages 153-164

  Armstrong Stassen, Marjorie ^a   Landstrom, Margaret ^a   Lumpkin, Ramona ^a  

^a UNIVERSITY OF WINDSOR   (Canada)

Author keywords

Gender differences in attitudes toward videoconferencing; Reactions to videoconferencing; Videoconferencing and distance education; Videoconferencing as a classroom instructional tool

Indexed keywords

EID: 0032357699     PISSN: 01972243     EISSN: 10876537     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1080/019722498128944     Document Type: Article

References (29)

1. Bagozzi, R. P., Davis, F. D., and Warshaw, P. R. 1992. Development and test of a theory of technological learning and usage. Human Relations 45:659-686.
2. Besser, H. 1996. Issues and challenges for the distance-independert environment. Journal of the American Society of Information Science 47. http://www.sims.berkeley.edu/~howard/Papers/Restricted/hbjasis.html
3. Brickfield, C. F. 1985. Attitudes and perceptions of older people toward technology. In Aging and technological advances, eds. P. K. Robinson, J. Livingston, and J. E. Birren, pp. 31-38. New York: Plenum Press.
4. Canada, K., and Brusca, F. 1991. The technological gender gap: Evidence and recommendations for educators and computer-based instruction designers. Educational Technology Research & Development 39(2):43-51.
5. Chen, M. 1986. Gender and computers: The beneficial effects of experience on attitudes. Journal of Educational Computing Research 2:265-282.
6. Colley, A. M., Gale, M. T., and Harris, T. A. 1994. Effects of gender role identity and experience on computer attitude components. Journal of Educational Computing Research 10:129-137.
7. Dyck, J. L., and Smither, J. A. 1994. Age differences in computer anxiety: The Role of computer experience, gender, and education. Journal of Educational Comp u ting Research 10:239-248.
8. Ford, C. T. 1995. The wired campus. University Affairs/Affaires Universitaires December:2.
9. Fussell, S. R., and Benimoff, N. I. 1995. Social and cognitive processes in interpersonal communication: Implications for advanced telecommunicationstechnologies. Human Factors 37:228-250.
10. Gowan, J. A., and Downs, J. M. 1994. Video conferencing human-machine interface: A held study. Information & Management 27:341-356.
11. Heinssen, R. K., Jr., Glass, C. R., and Knight, L. A. 1987. Assessing computer anxiety: Development and validation of the Computer Anxiety Rating Scale. Computers in Human Behavior 3:49-59.
12. Hildebrand, J. E. 1995. Video conferencing in the business curriculum. Journal of Business and Technical Communication 9:228-240.
13. Hiltz, R. 1995. Teaching in a virtual classroom. Paper presented at the International Conference on Computer Assisted Instruction, March, Hsinchu, Taiwan. http://www.njit.edu/njIT/Department/CCCC/VC/Papers/Teaching.html
14. Johnson, J. T 1993. A new look for videoconferencing services. Data Communications, May, 22:67-72.
15. Keinan, G. 1994. Effects of stress and tolerance of ambiguity on magical thinking. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology 67:48-55.
16. Leidner, D. E., and Jarvenpaa, S. L. 1993. The information age confronts education: Case studies on electronic classrooms. Information Systems Research 4:24-54.
17. Leidner, D. E., and Jarvenpaa, S. L. 1995. The use of information technology to enhance management school education: A theoretical view. MIS Quarterly 19:265-291.
18. Maurer, M. M. 1994. Computer anxiety correlates and what they tell us: A literature review. Computers in Human Behavior 10:369-376.
19. McLain, D. L. 1993.The MYSTAT-I: A new measure of an individual’s tolerance for ambiguity. Educational & Psychological Measurement 53:183-189.
20. Nelson, D. L., and Kletke, M. G. 1990. Individual adjustment during technological innovation: A research framework. Behaviour & Information Technology 9:257-271.
21. O’Conaill, B., Whittaker, S., and Wilbur, S. 1993. Conversations over videoconferences: An evaluation of the spoken aspects of videomediated interaction. Human-Computer Interaction 8:389-428.
22. Paul, R. H. 1995. Virtual realities or fantasies? Technology and the future of distance education. In Why the information highway? Lessons from open and distance education, eds. J. Roberts & E. Keogh, pp. 126-145. Toronto, Ontario: Trifolium Books.
23. Robinson, A. 1995. Delivering continuing professional development by cross-campus videoconferencing. International Journal of University Adult Education XXXIV(2):33-43.
24. Storck, J., and Sproull, L. 1995. Through a glass darkly: What do people learn in videoconferences? Human Communication Research 22:197-219.
25. Tang, J. C., and Isaacs, E. 1993. Why do users like video: Studies of multimedia-supported collaboration. Computer Supported Cooperative Work 1:163-196.
26. Tobin, J. M. 1995. Evaluation and research frontiers: What do we need to know? In Why the information highway? Lessons from open and distance education, eds. J. Roberts and E. Keogh, pp. 201-225. Toronto, Ontario: Trifolium Books.
27. Torkzadeh, G., and Koufteros, X. 1993. Computer user training and attitudes: A study of business undergraduates. Behaviour & Information Technology 12:284-292.
28. Webster, J., and Hackley, P. 1996. Learners’ reactions to distance telelearning. Paper presented at the annual meeting of the Academy of Management, August, Cincinnati, Ohio.
29. Whittaker, S. 1995. Rethinking video as a technology for interpersonal communications: Theory and design implications. International Journal of Human-Computer Studies 42:501-529.