Gender and Truthfulness in Daily Life Situations

Sex Roles

Volumn 38, Issue 9-10, 1998, Pages 821-831

  Robinson, Kelly A ^a   Obler, Loraine K ^b   Boone, R Thomas ^b   Shane, Howard ^b   Adamjee, Riaz ^b   Anderson, John ^b  

^a EMERSON COLLEGE   (United States)

^b NONE

Author keywords

[No Author keywords available]

Indexed keywords

EID: 0032357583     PISSN: 03600025     EISSN: 15732762     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1023/a:1018877215432     Document Type: Article

References (17)

1. Berry, D. S., & McArthur, L. Z. (1986). Some components and consequences of a babyface. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 48, 312-323.
2. Berryman-Fink, C. L., & Wilcox, J. R. (1983). A multivariate investigation of perceptual attributes concerning gender appropriateness in language. Sex Roles, 9, 663-681.
3. Cutler, A., & Scott, D. (1990). Speaker sex and perceived apportionment of talk. Applied Psycholinguistics, 11, 253-272.
4. DePaulo, B. M., Epstein, J. A., & Wyer, M. M. (1993). Sex differences in lying: How women and men deal with the dilemma of deceit. In M. Lewis and C. Saarni (Eds.), Lying and deception in everyday life (pp. 126-147). New York: Guilford Press.
5. Eagly, A. H., Mladinic, A., & Otto, S. (1991). Are women evaluated more favorably than men? Psychology of Women Quarterly, 15, 203-216.
6. Erickson, B., Lind, E. A., Johnson, B. C., & O'Barre, W. M. (1978). Speech style and impression formation in a court setting: The effects of "powerful" and "powerless" speech. Journal of Experimental and Social Psychology, 14, 266-279.
7. Feldman-Summers, S., Montano, D. E., Kasprzyk, D., & Wagner, B. (1980). Influence attempts when competing views are gender-related: Sex and credibility. Psychology of Women Quarterly, 5, 311-320.
8. Geddes, D. (1992). Sex roles in management: The impact of varying power of speech style on union members' perception of satisfaction and effectiveness. The Journal of Psychology, 126(6), 589-607.
9. Hodgson, S., & Pryor, B. (1984). Sex discrimination in the courtroom: Attorney's gender and credibility. Psychological Reports, 55, 483-486.
10. Hurwitz, S. D., Murray, S. M., & Johnson, B. T. (1992). Source credibility and the language of expert testimony. Journal of Applied Social Psychology, 22, 1909-1939.
11. Johnson, C., & Vinson, L. (1987). "Damned if you do, damned if you don't": Status, powerful speech, and evaluations of female witnesses. Women's Studies in Communication, 10, 37-44.
12. McArthur, L. Z., & Apatow, K. (1984). Impressions of babyfaced adults. Social Cognition, 2, 315-342.
13. Montepare, J. M., & Zebrowitz-McArthur, L. (1987). Perceptions of adults with childlike voices in two cultures. Journal of Experimental Social Psychology, 23, 331-349.
14. O'Hair, D., Cody, M. J., Goss, B., & Krayer, K. J. (1988). The effect of gender, deceit orientation and communication style on macro-assessments of honesty. Communication Quarterly, 36, 77-93.
15. Swenson, R., Nash, D. L., & Roos, D. C. (1984). Source credibility and perceived expertness of testimony in a simulated child-custody case. Professional Psychology: Research and Practice, 15, 891-898.
16. Zebrowitz, L. Z., & McDonald, S. M. (1991). The impact of litigants' babyfacedness and attractiveness on adjudication's in small claims court. Law and Human Behavior, 15, 603-623.
17. Zebrowitz, L. A., & Montepare, J. M. (1992). Impressions of babyfacedness across the lifespan. Developmental Psychology, 28, 261-279.