Confidentiality: Competing principles, inevitable dilemmas

Journal of Educational and Psychological Consultation

Volumn 9, Issue 3, 1998, Pages 267-275

  Taylor, Linda ^a   Adelman, Howard S ^b  

^a Los Angeles Unified School District   (United States)

^b UNIVERSITY OF CALIFORNIA   (United States)

Author keywords

[No Author keywords available]

Indexed keywords

EID: 0032356756     PISSN: 10474412     EISSN: None     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1207/s1532768xjepc0903_5     Document Type: Article

References (6)

1. Biklen, D. (1978). Consent as a cornerstone concept. In J. Mearig & Associates (Eds.), Working for children: Ethical issues beyond professional guidelines (pp. 90-114). San Francisco: Jossey-Bass.
2. English, A. (1995). The legal framework for minor consent. Introduction. In A. English, M. Matthews, K. Extavour, C. Palamountain, & J. Yang, State minor consent statues: A summary (pp. 3-7). San Francisco: National Center for Youth Law.
3. Huey, W. C., & Remley, T. P., Jr. (Eds.). (1989). Ethical and legal issues in school counseling. Alexandria, VA: American School Counseling Association.
4. Levine, J. (1975). The nature and definition of informed consent in various research settings. Washington, DC: National Commission for the Protection of Human Subjects.
5. Soler, M. I., & Peters, C. M. (1993). Who should know what? Confidentiality and information sharing in service integration. New York: National Center for Service Integration.
6. Taylor, L., & Adelman, H. S. (1989). Reframing the confidentiality dilemma to work in children's best interests. Professional Psychology: Research and Practice, 20, 79-83.