Peak Shift on an Artificial Dimension

Quarterly Journal of Experimental Psychology Section B: Comparative and Physiological Psychology

Volumn 51, Issue 1, 1998, Pages 1-32

  Wills, Sarah ^a   Mackintosh, N J ^a,b  

^a UNIVERSITY OF CAMBRIDGE   (United Kingdom)

^b UK   (United Kingdom)

Author keywords

[No Author keywords available]

Indexed keywords

EID: 0032354622     PISSN: 02724995     EISSN: None     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: None     Document Type: Article

References (19)

1. Bloomfield, T.M. (1967). A peak shift on a line-tilt continuum. Journal of Experimental Analysis of Behaviour, 10, 361-366.
2. Blough, D.S. (1975). Steady state data and a quantitative model of generalization and discrimination. Journal of Experimental Psychology: Animal Behaviour Processes, 1, 3-21.
3. Ernst, A.J., Engberg, L., & Thomas, D.R. (1971). On the form of stimulus generalization curves for visual intensity. Journal of Experimental Analysis of Behaviour, 16, 177-180.
4. Estes, W.K. (1950). Towards a statistical theory of learning. Psychological Review, 57, 94-107.
5. Evans, E.F. (1975). The sharpening of cochlea frequency selectivity in the normal and abnormal cochlea. Audiology, 14, 419-442.
6. Guttman, N. (1965). Effects of discrimination formation on generalization measured from a positive-rate baseline. In D.I. Mostofsky (Ed.), Stimulus Generalization (pp. 210-217). San Francisco, CA: Stanford University Press.
7. Hanson, H.M. (1959). Effects of discrimination training on stimulus generalization. Journal of Experimental Psychology, 58, 321-34.
8. Jenkins, H.M. & Sainsbury, R.S. (1970). Discrimination learning with the distinctive feature on positive or negative trials. In D.I. Mostofsky (Ed.), Attention: Contemporary theory and analysis (pp. 239-273). New York: Appleton-Century-Crofts.
9. Köhler, W. (1918). Nachweis einfacher Strukturfunktionen beim Schimpansen und beim Haushuhn. Abhandlungen der königlichen Preussischen Akademie der Wissenschaften, Physische-Mathematische Klasse, Nr. 2, 1-101.
10. Translated and condensed as "Simple structural functions in the chimpanzee and in the chicken" in W.D. Ellis, A Source Book of Gestalt Psychology. London: Routledge and Kegan Paul.
11. Lawrence, D.H. & DeRivera, J. (1954). Evidence for relational transposition. Journal of Comparative and Physiological Psychology, 47, 464-471.
12. Marsh, G. (1967). Relational learning in the pigeon. Journal of Comparative and Physiological Psychology, 64, 519-521.
13. Neimark, E.D., & Estes, W.K. (1967). Stimulus sampling theory. San Francisco, CA: Holden-Day.
14. Pearce, J. (1987). A model for stimulus generalization in Pavlovian conditioning. Psychological Review, 94, 61-73.
15. Rescorla, R.A. & Wagner, A.R. (1972). A theory of Pavlovian conditioning: Variations in the effectiveness of reinforcement and nonreinforcement. In A.H. Black & W.F. Proskay (Eds.), Classical conditioning II: Current research and theory (pp. 64-99). New York: Appleton-Century-Crofts.
16. Riley, D., Ring, K., & Thomas, J. (1960). The effect of stimulus comparison on discrimination learning and transposition. Journal of Comparative and Physiological Psychology, 53, 415-421.
17. Saldanha, E.L. & Bitterman, M.E. (1951). Relational learning in the rat. American Journal of Psychology, 64, 37-53.
18. Spence, K.W. (1937). The differential response in animals to stimuli varying within a single dimension. Psychological Review, 44, 430-441.
19. Thompson, R.F. (1965). The neural basis of stimulus generalisation. In D.I. Mostofsky (Ed.), Stimulus generalization (pp. 154-178). San Francisco, CA: Stanford University Press.