Understanding the role of paracellular transport in the proximal tubule

News in Physiological Sciences

Volumn 13, Issue , 1998, Pages 38-43

  García, Néstor H ^a   Ramsey, Carla R ^a   Knox, Franklyn G ^a  

^a MAYO CLINIC   (United States)

Author keywords

[No Author keywords available]

Indexed keywords

EID: 0032353218     PISSN: 08861714     EISSN: None     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1152/physiologyonline.1998.13.1.38     Document Type: Article

References (15)

1. Anderson, J. M., and C. M. Van Itallie. Tight junctions and the molecular basis for regulation of paracellular permeability. Am. J. Physiol. 269 (Gastrointest. Liver Physiol. 32): G467-G475, 1995.
2. Ballard, S. T., J. H. Hunter, and A. E. Taylor. Regulation of tight-junction permeability during nutrient absorption across the intestinal epithelium. Annu. Rev. Nutr. 15: 35-55, 1995.
3. Berry, C. A. Water permeability and pathways in the proximal tubule. Am. J. Physiol. 245 (Renal Fluid Electrolyte Physiol. 14): F279-F294, 1983.
4. Berry, C. A., and E. L. Boulpaep. Nonelectrolyte permeability ot the paracellular pathway in Necturus proximal tubule. Am. J. Physiol. 228: 581-595, 1975.
5. Bomsztyk, K., and F. S. Wright. Dependence of ion fluxes on fluid transport by rat proximal tubule. Am. J. Physiol. 250 (Renal Fluid Electrolyte Physiol. 19): F680-F689, 1986.
6. Carpi-Medina, P. E., and G. Whittembury. Comparison of transcellular and transepithelial water osmotic permeabilities (Pos) in the isolated proximal straight tubule (PST) of the rabbit kidney. Pflügers Arch. 400: 343-348, 1988.
7. Fraser, W. D., and A. D. Baines. Application of a f ber-matrix model to transport in renal tubules. J. Gen. Physiol. 94: 863-879, 1989.
8. Imai, M., and J. P. Kokko, Effect of peritubular protein concentration on reabsorption of sodium and water in isolated perfused proximal tubules. J. Clin. Invest. 51: 314-325, 1972.
9. Jacobson, H. R. Altered permeability in the proximal tubule response to cyclic AMP. Am. J. Physiol. 236 (Renal Fluid Electrolyte Physiol. 5): F71-F79, 1979.
10. 3 in rabbit proximal tubules. Am. J. Physiol. 243 (Renal Fluid Electrolyte Physiol. 12): F342-F348, 1982.
11. Kinoshita, Y., and F. G. Knox. Role of prostaglandins in proximal tubule reabsorption: response to elevated renal interstitial hydrostatic pressure. Circ. Res. 64: 1013-1018, 1988.
12. Long, C. R., T. J. Berndt, and F. G. Knox. Effect of renal interstitial hydrostatic pressure and prostaglandins on paracellular flux in the proximal tubule (Abstract). FASEB J. 8: A835, 1994.
13. Maeda, Y., B. Smith, P. Agre, and M. A. Knepper. Quantification of aquaporin-CHIP water channel protein in microdissected renal tubules by fluorescence-based ELISA. J. Clin. Invest. 95: 422-428, 1995.
14. Preisig, P., and C. Berry. Evidence for transcellular osmotic water flow in rat proximal tubules. Am. J. Physiol. 249 (Renal Fluid Electrolyte Physiol. 18): F124-F141, 1985.
15. Reuss, L. Tight junction permeability to ions and water. In: Tight Junctions (1st ed.), edited by M. Cerejido. Boca Raton, FL: CRC, 1992, chapt. 4, p. 49-66.