Crime control, due process and 'the case for the prosecution': A problem of terminology?

British Journal of Criminology

Volumn 38, Issue 4, 1998, Pages 611-615

  Duff, Peter ^a  

^a NONE

Author keywords

[No Author keywords available]

Indexed keywords

EID: 0032353028     PISSN: 00070955     EISSN: None     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1093/bjc/38.4.611     Document Type: Article

References (9)

1. ASHWORTH, A. (1979), 'Concepts of Criminal Justice', Criminal Law Review, 412.
2. DAMASKA, M. (1973), 'Evidentiary Barriers to Conviction and Two Models of Criminal Procedure: A Comparative Study', University of Pennsylvania Law Review, 121: 506.
3. MCBARNET, D. (1978), 'False Dichotomies in Criminal Justice Research', in J. Baldwin and A. K. Bottomley, eds., Criminal Justice, 23-34. London: Martin Robertson.
4. _(1979), 'Arrest: the Legal Context of Policing', in S. Holdaway, ed., The British Police, 24-40. London: Arnold.
5. MCCONVILLE, M., SANDERS, A. and LENG, R. (1997), 'Descriptive or Critical Sociology: The Choice is Yours', British Journal of Criminology, 37/3: 347.
6. PACKER, H. (1969), The Limits of the Criminal Sanction. Stanford: Stanford University Press.
7. SKOLNICK, J. (1966), Justice Without Trial. New York: Wiley.
8. _(1982), Review of Conviction by D. McBarnet, Journal of Criminal Law and Criminology, 73: 1329.
9. SMITH, D. J (1997), 'Case Construction and the Goals of Criminal Process', British Journal of Criminology, 37/3: 319.