The good, the better, and the best in political science

PS - Political Science and Politics

Volumn 31, Issue 4, 1998, Pages 826-828

  Ballard, Michael J ^a   Mitchell, Neil J ^a  

^a NONE

Author keywords

[No Author keywords available]

Indexed keywords

EID: 0032351845     PISSN: 10490965     EISSN: None     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1017/S1049096500053427     Document Type: Review

References (9)

1. American Political Science Association. 1986. 1992. 1995. Graduate Faculty and Programs in Political Science. Washington, DC: American Political Science Association.
2. Garand, James C. 1990. "An Alternative Interpretation of Recent Political Science Journal Evaluations." PS: Political Science and Politics 23(September): 448-51.
3. Jackman, Robert W., and Randolph M. Siverson. 1996. "Rating the Rating: An Analysis of the National Research Council's Appraisal of Political Science Ph.D. Programs." PS: Political Science and Politics 29(June): 155-60.
4. Katz, Richard S., and Munroe Eagles. 1996. "Ranking Political Science Programs: A View from the Lower Half." PS: Political Science and Politics 29(June): 149-54.
5. Lowery, Robert C., and Brian D. Silver. 1996. "A Rising Tide Lifts All Boats: Political Science Department Reputation and the Reputation of the University." PS: Political Science and Politics 29(June): 161-67.
6. McCormick, James M., and E. Lee Bernick. 1982. "Graduate Training and Productivity: A Look at Who Publishes." Journal of Politics 44(February): 212-27.
7. Miller, Arthur H., Charles Tien, and Andrew A. Peebler. 1996. "Department Rankings: An Alternative Approach." PS: Political Science and Politics 29(December): 704-17.
8. National Research Council. 1995. Research Doctorate Programs in the United States: Continuity and Change. Washington, DC: National Academy Press.
9. Welch, Susan, and John R. Hibbing. 1983. "What Do the New Ratings of Political Science Departments Measure?" PS: Political Science and Politics 16(September): 532-40.