Principles for rethinking the federal government's role in economic development

Economic Development Quarterly

Volumn 12, Issue 4, 1998, Pages 299-312

  Hill, Edward W ^a  

^a NONE

Author keywords

[No Author keywords available]

Indexed keywords

EID: 0032345775     PISSN: 08912424     EISSN: None     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1177/089124249801200402     Document Type: Article

References (25)

1. American Economic Development Council. (1984). Economic development today: A report to the profession. Shiller Park, IL: Author.
2. Barnes, W., & Ledebur, L. (1998). The new regional economies. Thousand Oaks, CA: Sage.
3. Bartik, T. (1994). What should the federal government be doing about urban economic development? Cityscape, 1(1), 267-292.
4. Bartik, T. (1996). Strategies for economic development. In J. R. Aronson & E. Schwartz (Eds.), Management policies in local government finance (4th ed., pp. 287-311). Washington, DC: International City/County Management Association.
5. Bingham, R. (1998). Industrial policy American style: From Hamilton to HDTV. Armonk, NY: M. E. Sharpe.
6. Chinitz, B. (1960). Contrasts in agglomeration: New York and Pittsburgh. American Economic Review, Papers and Proceedings, 50, 279-289.
7. Dabson, B. (1994). Renewing the Economic Development Administration. Renewing the Economic Development Administration: New approaches to economic development (pp. 156-162). Subcommittee on Economic Growth and Credit Formation of the Committee on Banking, Finance, and Urban Affairs, U.S. House of Representatives, 103rd Congress, Serial 103-125.
8. Engberg, J. (1996). Employment policy and urban economic development. Housing Policy Debate, 7(4), 695-714.
9. Glasmeier, A. (1997). Rural America and 21st century development policy: The federal role. In B. Harrison & M. Weiss (Eds.), Rethinking national economic development policy [Project report prepared by the EDAC of Boston] (pp. 203-236). Springfield, VA: U.S. Department of Commerce, National Technical Information Service.
10. Haider, D. (1986). Economic development: Changing practices in a changing U.S. economy. Environment and Planning C: Government and Policy, 4, 451-469.
11. Harrison, B., Glasmeier, A., & Polenske, K. (1997). National, regional, and local economic development policy: New thinking about old ideas. In B. Harrison & M. Weiss (Eds.), Rethinking national economic development policy [Project report prepared by the EDAC of Boston] (pp. 33-102). Springfield, VA: U.S. Department of Commerce, National Technical Information Service.
12. Haynes, K., & Stough, R. (1997). The federal urban policy agenda: Recent past and new realities. American Academy of Political and Social Science Annual, 551, 208-221.
13. Hill, E. (1997). Policy lessons from Cleveland's economic restructuring and the accompanying case study. In B. Harrison & M. Weiss (Eds.), Rethinking national economic development policy [Project report prepared by the EDAC of Boston] (pp. 139-202). Springfield, VA: U.S. Department of Commerce, National Technical Information Service.
14. Hill, E., & Bier, T. (1989). Economic restructuring: Earnings, occupations and housing values in Cleveland. Economic Development Quarterly, 3(2), 123-144.
15. Isserman, A. (1994). State economic development policy and practice in the United States: A survey article. International Regional Science Review, 16(1/2), 49-100.
16. Isserman, A. (1997). Wash our hands, tie their hands, or shake their hands? The federal role in rural economic development: Some empirical evidence with implications for current policy debates. In B. Harrison & M. Weiss (Eds.), Rethinking national economic development policy [Project report prepared by the EDAC of Boston] (pp. 237-264). Springfield, VA: U.S. Department of Commerce, National Technical Information Service.
17. McGahey, R. (1997). Economic development, devolution, and public policy: Reforming federal and state policy in an era of global competition. In B. Harrison & M. Weiss (Eds.), Rethinking national economic development policy [Project report prepared by the EDAC of Boston] (pp. 103-138). Springfield, VA: U.S. Department of Commerce, National Technical Information Service.
18. National Academy of Public Administration (NAPA). (1996). A path to smarter economic development: Reassessing the federal role. Washington, DC: Author.
19. Nowak, J. (1997). Neighborhood initiative and the regional economy. Economic Development Quarterly, 11(1), 3-10.
20. Olson, M. (1982). The rise and decline of nations. New Haven, CT: Yale University Press.
21. Rivlin, A. (1992). Reviving the American dream. Washington, DC: Brookings Institution.
22. Schweke, W., Dabson, B., & Rist, C. (1996). Improving your business climate. Washington, DC: Corporation for Enterprise Development.
23. Teitz, M. (1989). Neighborhood economics: Local communities and regional labor markets. Economic Development Quarterly, 3(2), 111-122.
24. U.S. General Accounting Office. (1996). Economic development: Limited information exists on the impact of assistance provided by three agencies (GAO/RED-96-103). Washington, DC: Author.
25. Wolman, H., Hanson, R., Hill, E., Howland, M., & Ledebur, L. (1992). National urban economic development policy. Journal of Urban Affairs, 14(3/4), 217-238.