Modified real structures for quantum groups and applications

Journal of Mathematical Physics

Volumn 39, Issue 11, 1998, Pages 6153-6161

  Grensing, G ^a  

^a UNIVERSITY OF KIEL   (Germany)

Author keywords

[No Author keywords available]

Indexed keywords

EID: 0032342778     PISSN: 00222488     EISSN: None     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1063/1.532620     Document Type: Article

References (49)

1. V. G. Drinfeld, in Proceedings of the International Congress of Mathematics, Berkeley 1986, edited by A. M. Gleason (American Mathematical Society. Providence, RI. 1987).
2. V. Chari and A, Pressley, A Guide to Quantum Groups (Cambridge University Press, Cambridge, 1994); S. Majid. Foundations of Quantum Group Theory (Cambridge University Press, Cambridge, 1995); C. Kassel, Quantum Groups (Springer-Verlag, New York, 1995).
3. V. Chari and A, Pressley, A Guide to Quantum Groups (Cambridge University Press, Cambridge, 1994); S. Majid. Foundations of Quantum Group Theory (Cambridge University Press, Cambridge, 1995); C. Kassel, Quantum Groups (Springer-Verlag, New York, 1995).
4. V. Chari and A, Pressley, A Guide to Quantum Groups (Cambridge University Press, Cambridge, 1994); S. Majid. Foundations of Quantum Group Theory (Cambridge University Press, Cambridge, 1995); C. Kassel, Quantum Groups (Springer-Verlag, New York, 1995).
5. N. Yu. Reshetikhin and V. G. Turaev, Invent. Math. 103, 547 (1991).
6. V. Pasquier and H. Saleur, Nucl. Phys. B 330, 523 (1990).
7. N. B. Wiegmann and A. V. Zabrodin, Nucl. Phys. B 422, 495 (1994).
8. I. I. Kogan, Int. J. Mod. Phys. A 9, 3887 (1994).
9. T. Masuda, K. Mimachi, Y. Nakagami, M. Noumi, Y. Saburi, and K. Ueno, Lett. Math. Phys. 19, 187 (1990).
10. V. V. Lyubashenko, in Quantum Groups, edited by P P. Kulish (Springer-Verlag, Berlin, 1992).
11. G. Mack and V. Schomerus, Nucl. Phys. B 370, 185 (1992).
12. M. R. Montero, I. Ruditi, L. M. C. S. Rodrigues, and S. Sciuto, Mod. Phys. Lett. A 5, 419 (1995).
13. F. Wilczek, in Fractional Statistics and Anyon Superconductivity (World Scientific, Singapore, 1990).
14. Note that we stick to the conventional definition of the *-structure on tensor products; in particular, on A⊗ A we have *⊗*(a⊗a′) = *(a)⊗*(a′) for a,a′ ∈ A. In Ref. 9 the Order of the factors on the right-hand side is reversed.
15. P. Roche and D. Arnaudon, Lett. Math. Phys. 17, 295 (1989); G. Keller, ibid. 21, 273 (1991).
16. P. Roche and D. Arnaudon, Lett. Math. Phys. 17, 295 (1989); G. Keller, ibid. 21, 273 (1991).
17. A. N. Kirillov and N. Yu. Reshetikhin. in Infinite Dimensional Lie Algebras and Groups, edited by V. G. Kac (World Scientific, Singapore, 1989).
18. V. Jones, Ann. Math. 126, 335 (1987).
19. F. C. Alcaraz, M. N. Barber, M T. Batchelor, R. I. Baxter, and G. R. W. Quispel, J. Phys. A 20, 6397 (1987).
20. L. Mecinescu and R. I. Nepomechie, in Quantum Groups, edited by T. Curtright, D. Fairlie, and C. Zachos (World Scientific, Singapore, 1990).
21. H. Temperley and E. Lieb, Proc. R. Soc. London 322, 251 (1971).
22. One could guess that the additional parameter t gives rise to the two-variable knot invariant, but in the skein relations it drops out; cf. also N. Yu. Reshetikhin, Lett. Math. Phys. 20, 331 (1990).
23. P. Jordan and E. P. Wigner, Z. Phys. 47, 631 (1928).
24. M. Lüsclier, Nucl. Phys. B 326, 557 (1989); E. Fradkin, Phys. Rev. Lett. 63, 322 (1989).
25. M. Lüsclier, Nucl. Phys. B 326, 557 (1989); E. Fradkin, Phys. Rev. Lett. 63, 322 (1989).
26. 2). The approach given here can also be generalized to two dimensions on replacing the step function θ by the two-dimensional lattice angle function, as given from Chern-Simons theory.
27. N. Yu, Reshetikhin, Lett. Math. Phys. 20, 331 (1990); A. Sudbery, J. Phys. A 73, L697 (1990); A. Schirrmacher, J. Wess, and B. Zumino, Z. Phys. C 49, 317 (1991); C. Burdik and L. Hlavaty, ibid. 24, L165 (1991).
28. N. Yu, Reshetikhin, Lett. Math. Phys. 20, 331 (1990); A. Sudbery, J. Phys. A 73, L697 (1990); A. Schirrmacher, J. Wess, and B. Zumino, Z. Phys. C 49, 317 (1991); C. Burdik and L. Hlavaty, ibid. 24, L165 (1991).
29. N. Yu, Reshetikhin, Lett. Math. Phys. 20, 331 (1990); A. Sudbery, J. Phys. A 73, L697 (1990); A. Schirrmacher, J. Wess, and B. Zumino, Z. Phys. C 49, 317 (1991); C. Burdik and L. Hlavaty, ibid. 24, L165 (1991).
30. N. Yu, Reshetikhin, Lett. Math. Phys. 20, 331 (1990); A. Sudbery, J. Phys. A 73, L697 (1990); A. Schirrmacher, J. Wess, and B. Zumino, Z. Phys. C 49, 317 (1991); C. Burdik and L. Hlavaty, ibid. 24, L165 (1991).
31. What we have not been able to show is that the Hamiltonian has only real eigenvalues because we do not know of a real structure for |q| = 1 and |t|= 1, which is compatible with the coalgebra structure; it exists for |q| = 1 and t real, but this is not the case of interest.
32. R. Prange and S. Girvin, in The Quantum Hall Effect (Springer-Verlag, New York, 1990); M. Stone, in Quantum Hall Effect (World Scientific, Singapore, 1992).
33. R. Prange and S. Girvin, in The Quantum Hall Effect (Springer-Verlag, New York, 1990); M. Stone, in Quantum Hall Effect (World Scientific, Singapore, 1992).
34. G. Grensing, "Fractional quantum Hall effect and quantum symmetry," preprint university of Kiel, August 1997.
35. E. Brown, Phys. Rev. A 133, 1038 (1964); J. Zak, ibid. 134, 1602,1607 (1964).
36. E. Brown, Phys. Rev. A 133, 1038 (1964); J. Zak, ibid. 134, 1602,1607 (1964).
37. From Kogan's approach (Ref. 6) one might infer that it is essential to work in the symmetric gauge; but on the torus one must stay in the unsymmetric gauge.
38. D. Mumford, Tata Lectures on Theta I, Progress in Mathematics 28 (Birkhäuser, Boston, 1983).
39. For nonzero values of the phases μ. and v, the representations generally belong to the cyclic series. However, there is one special case for which, again, a highest weight representation is obtained. Namely, if the ground state wave functions are required to be modular invariant, one can show that this requirement is met if the phases take the values μ= - v=1/2; hence, there are no spin structures. It is straightforward to prove that the resulting representation is equivalent to (29).
40. m in the notation of Sec. III. Also note the crucial role of the choice ∈= 1 in (12).
41. L. Alvarez-Gaumé, C. Goméz, and G. Sierra, Nucl. Phys. B 330, 347 (1990); C. Goméz and G. Sierra, ibid. 352, 791 (1991).
42. L. Alvarez-Gaumé, C. Goméz, and G. Sierra, Nucl. Phys. B 330, 347 (1990); C. Goméz and G. Sierra, ibid. 352, 791 (1991).
43. H. T. Sato, Mod. Phys. Lett. A 9, 1819 (1994).
44. G. Grensing, Phys. Lett. B 419, 258 (1998).
45. E. Twietmeyer, Lett. Math. Phys. 24, 49 (1992).
46. R. B. Laughlin, Phys. Rev. Lett. 50, 1395 (1983).
47. F. D. M. Haldane and E. H. Rezayi, Phys. Rev. B 31, 2529 (1985); G. Cristofano, G. Maiella, R. Musto, and F. Nicodemi, Mod. Phys. Lett. A 6, 1779 (1991); Nucl. Phys. B (Proc. Suppl.) 33C, 119 (1993).
48. F. D. M. Haldane and E. H. Rezayi, Phys. Rev. B 31, 2529 (1985); G. Cristofano, G. Maiella, R. Musto, and F. Nicodemi, Mod. Phys. Lett. A 6, 1779 (1991); Nucl. Phys. B (Proc. Suppl.) 33C, 119 (1993).
49. F. D. M. Haldane and E. H. Rezayi, Phys. Rev. B 31, 2529 (1985); G. Cristofano, G. Maiella, R. Musto, and F. Nicodemi, Mod. Phys. Lett. A 6, 1779 (1991); Nucl. Phys. B (Proc. Suppl.) 33C, 119 (1993).