Science and Judgment in Environmental Standard Setting

Applied Measurement in Education

Volumn 11, Issue 1, 1998, Pages 107-120

  Jasanoff, Sheila ^a  

^a Department of Obstetrics Gynecology   (United States)

Author keywords

[No Author keywords available]

Indexed keywords

EID: 0032342406     PISSN: 08957347     EISSN: None     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1207/s15324818ame1101_7     Document Type: Article

References (9)

1. American heritage dictionary. (1969). Boston: Houghton Mifflin. Baltimore Gas and Electric Co. v. NRDC, 462 U.S. 87 (1983).
2. Graham, J. D., Green, L. C., & Roberts, M. J. (1988). In search of safety: Chemicals and cancer risk. Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press.
3. Jasanoff, S. (1990). The fifth branch: Science advisers as policymakers. Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press.
4. Jasanoff, S. (1995). Science at the bar: Law, science and technology in America. Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press.
5. Johnson, J. (1995). Dioxin risk: Are we sure yet? Environmental Science and Technology, 29, 24A-25A.
6. National Research Council. (1983). Risk assessment in the federal government: Managing the process. Washington, DC: National Academy Press.
7. National Research Council. (1994). Science and judgment in risk assessment. Washington, DC: National Academy Press.
8. Salter, L. (1988). Mandated science: Science and scientists in the making of standards. Dordrecht, The Netherlands: Kluwer.
9. Stem, P. C. (1991). Learning through conflict: A realistic strategy for risk communication. Policy Sciences, 24, 99-119.