An integrated mathematical programming model for offset planning

Computers and Operations Research

Volumn 25, Issue 12, 1998, Pages 1069-1083

  Radasch, Deborah Koucky ^a   Kwak, N K ^b  

^a BOEING COMPANY   (United States)

^b SAINT LOUIS UNIVERSITY   (United States)

Author keywords

Analytic hierarchy process; Goal programming; Industrial cooperation; Multicriteria decision making; Offset (countertrade)

Indexed keywords

COMPUTER SOFTWARE; DECISION MAKING; HIERARCHICAL SYSTEMS; INDUSTRIAL RELATIONS; MATHEMATICAL MODELS; MATHEMATICAL PROGRAMMING; PROBLEM SOLVING; SENSITIVITY ANALYSIS; STRATEGIC PLANNING;

ANALYTIC HIERARCHY PROCESS (AHP); INDUSTRIAL COOPERATION; OFFSET PLANNING;

OPERATIONS RESEARCH;

EID: 0032340691     PISSN: 03050548     EISSN: None     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1016/s0305-0548(98)00031-8     Document Type: Article

References (20)

1. Ellingsen, T. and Stole, L. A., Mandated countertrade as a strategic commitment. Journal of International Economics, 1996, 40, 67-84.
2. Falker, L. B., Countertrade's impact on supply function. International Journal of Purchasing and Materials Management, 1996, 32, 37-45.
3. Gilbert, N., The case for countertrade. Across the Board, 1992, 29, 43.
4. Hennart, J.-F., Beyond barter. Chief Executive, 1990, 56, 72.
5. Alexandrides, C. G., Countertrade and global strategies. Contract Management, 1990, 3, 5-12.
6. Palia, A., Worldwide network of countertrade services. Industrial Marketing Management, 1990, 1, 69.
7. Howard, A. A. and Yeakel, J. A., Who wins in international countertrade? Financial Executive, 1990, 48-52.
8. Ehie, I. C., Omurtag, B. Y. and Clarke, L., Prioritizing development goals in low-income developing countries. Omega, 1990, 18, 185-194.
9. Saaty, T. L., A scaling method for priorities in hierarchical structures. Journal of Mathematical Psychology, 1977, 15, 59-62.
10. Saaty, T. L., The Analytic Hierarchy Process. McGraw-Hill, New York, 1980.
11. Saaty, T. L., Rank generation, preservation, and reversal in the analytic hierarchy decision process. Decision Sciences, 1987, 18, 157-177.
12. Wedley, W. C., Combining qualitative and quantitative factors: an analytic hierarchy process. Socio-Economic Planning Sciences, 1990, 24, 57-64.
13. Khorramshagol, R. and Ignizio, J. P., Single and multiple decision-making in a multiple objective environment. Advances in Management Studies, 1984, 3, 181-192.
14. Gass, S. I., A process for determining priorities and weights for large scale goal programming. Journal of the Operational Research Society, 1986, 37, 779-785.
15. Schoner, B. S. and Wedley, C. W., Ambiguous criteria weights in AHP: consequences and solutions. Decision Sciences, 1989, 20, 462-475.
16. Dyer, J. S., Remarks on the analytic hierarchy process. Management Sciences, 1990, 36, 249-258.
17. Diminnie, C. B. and Kwak, N. K., A hierarchical goal programming approach to reverse resource allocation in institutions of higher learning. Journal of the Operational Research Society, 1986, 37, 59-66.
18. Kwak, N. K. and Schniederjans, M. J., A goal programming model as an aid in facility location analysis. Computers and Operations Research, 1985, 12, 151-161.
19. Expert Choice, A software package marketed by Decision Support Software. Expert Choice, Pittsburgh, PA, 1993.
20. Lee, S. M. and Shim, J. P., Micro Management Science, 2nd edn. Allyn and Bacon, Needharn Heights, MA, 1990.